Moundsview vs Wayzata

LHSeagles21
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 12:31 pm

Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by LHSeagles21 » Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:11 pm

Who are the top players for each team? Who will make in impact on the game tonight? <p></p><i></i>

Grinder075
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:48 pm

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by Grinder075 » Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:15 pm

Mounds view has two good forwards in Kolby Dahl, and T.j. Dimke. Wayzata i'm not sure besides joey miller, but they should have a good group of kids as well. Kolby Dahl can put the puck away against any team and he has size. I am gonna have to say Wayzata should take this game 4-2 because Mounds View goaltending is weak again this year. <p></p><i></i>

WarroadWarrior
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 12:14 am

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by WarroadWarrior » Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:02 pm

This is one of the sloppier game's i've seen this year, numerous missedf passes. Hard to get any flow to the game. <p></p><i></i>

backhand44
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:43 am

moundsview

Post by backhand44 » Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:56 pm

I watched MV vs Hastings the other night Dahl was invisable did nothing.The best kid in the building was the Sophmore forward for Hastings.#9 <p></p><i></i>

Grinder075
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:48 pm

Re: moundsview

Post by Grinder075 » Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:11 pm

well obviously your a kid seeing how you spelt invisible with an a, so you must be some angry kid who he schooled<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ... i will admit he is lazy, but he can skate and stickhandle and finish better than 90 % of high school kids. <p></p><i></i>

CentralMNHockeyGuy
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:32 pm

Re: moundsview

Post by CentralMNHockeyGuy » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:09 am

An alright game Wayzata had alot of chances to put MV away but couldnt seem to find the back of the net. I was impressed with Miller. And it looks to me that that Wayzata should stick with the Freshman the nets!! <p></p><i></i>

gunslinger
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:03 am

Re: moundsview

Post by gunslinger » Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:31 am

I didnt feel that either team was very good! This was the third time I have seen each of them... Im not overly impressed!<br><br>-The Slinger<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Eddie Shore
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:38 am

Re: moundsview

Post by Eddie Shore » Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:44 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>well obviously your a kid seeing how you spelt invisible with an a<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>If you're going to hammer someone else about their spelling, you might want to pull out the dictionary yourself. "Your" should be you're - the contraction for you are. The word "spelt" does not exist in the English language. Spelled is what you are looking for. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/embarassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... mnhs>Eddie Shore</A> at: 12/20/05 8:46 am<br></i>

Grizz 07
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 10:39 am

FSN?

Post by Grizz 07 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:10 am

Why in the world would FSN want to broadcast these 2 terrible teams ??? <p></p><i></i>

Pondskater
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:20 am

Re: FSN?

Post by Pondskater » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:20 am

I thought both teams were inept- Miller was the only player that seemed to create anything. <p></p><i></i>

BULLDOG 888
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: FSN?

Post by BULLDOG 888 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:10 am

Moundsview, with that new head coach, shows a lot of potential! i was surprised how well they hung in the game last night, and they looked very good...however wayzata is yet to surprise me this year as well...<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Akhockey17
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:00 pm

Re: FSN?

Post by Akhockey17 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:58 pm

Watched the game on TV today, couldn't watch the third because of practice, but it looked pretty close. <p></p><i></i>

TheWingMan22
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:21 pm

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by TheWingMan22 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:10 pm

AkHockey you a member on gongshowhockey.com? <p>_______________________________<br><br>The average teenage boy thinks about sex once every seven seconds; in Minnesota he thinks about hockey the other six.<br><br>"BLADES OF GLORY"</p><i></i>

KnightTime36
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:32 pm

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by KnightTime36 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:20 pm

All I have to say... is how sweet was the wayzata goalie? I would never guess that he is only a freshman. <p>What it is... Its Knight Time Baby!!!</p><i></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by gr19 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:30 pm

very boring game. <p></p><i></i>

cwhockey31
Posts: 221
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 3:13 pm

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by cwhockey31 » Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:34 pm

Rosemount vs. Mounds View game just got over, Rosmount won 4-1.<br><br>36 shots Rosmount<br>23 shots Mounds View <p></p><i></i>

spanky
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:44 pm

cwhockey31

Post by spanky » Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:19 am

Cody,<br><br>If you are going to put info up make sure it is accurate. Shots were Rosemount 31........Moundsview 25.<br><br>And there already is a thread for this game! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... >spanky</A> at: 12/21/05 12:21 am<br></i>

Akhockey17
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:00 pm

Re: Moundsview vs Wayzata

Post by Akhockey17 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:47 am

Yep. Akhockey17. <p></p><i></i>

Locked