1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Grovetown Scotty
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:18 am

1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Post by Grovetown Scotty » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:39 pm

Very interesting White Bear ahead of Moorhead and Duluth East ahead of Elk River.<br><br><br><br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.letsplayhockey.com/882ranksw ... <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... >Grovetown Scotty</A> at: 1/5/06 2:41 pm<br></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Post by gr19 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:48 pm

Who votes for their rankings? When you think they can't get any more stupid...<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

TG663303
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:09 pm

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Post by TG663303 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:04 pm

Ya the only part of the rankings that I agree with is Holy Angels at 1 and Hill-Murray at 2. Everything else is just messed up. <p></p><i></i>

wbmd
Posts: 3893
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Post by wbmd » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:17 pm

Their ratings are a joke and always have been. <p></p><i></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: 1-6 Lets Play Hockey Rankings

Post by gr19 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:38 pm

Those rankings are so bad I hope everyone goes to their web site and emails them and completely bashes them for being so retarded. <p></p><i></i>

brickwall33
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:12 pm

Ratings

Post by brickwall33 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:40 pm

can somebody post the new rating on here.... <p></p><i></i>

WBLBEARS06
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 2:05 pm

Re: Ratings

Post by WBLBEARS06 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:43 pm

1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East<br>9. Cretin DH<br>10. Elk River<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd <p>The curse lives on.....</p><i></i>

Ibleedgreen
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm

re: rankings

Post by Ibleedgreen » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:47 pm

lph is a rag. it's only useful purpose is for parents to show what bad writers they are by submitting stories with their son's names in them. <p></p><i></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: Ratings

Post by gr19 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:48 pm

1. Holy Angels<br>2. Hill Murray<br>3. Centennial<br>4. White Bear Lake <br>5. Jefferson<br>6. Moorhead-wrong ^<br>7. Eden Prairie<br>8. Duluth East-wrong v<br>9. Cretin DH-wrong v<br>10. Elk River-wrong v<br>11. Apple Valley<br>12. Cloquet-wrong ^<br>13. Blaine<br>14. Minnetonka<br>15. Brainerd-right... <p></p><i></i>

Eddie Shore
Posts: 240
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:38 am

Re: Ratings

Post by Eddie Shore » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:04 pm

Say what you will about LPH, but they have some well-respected AA coaches that submit their rankings on a weekly basis. These are some of the same coaches that many of you tout as being brilliant. So they are the "dumb" ones as it turns out. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

elliott70
Posts: 15425
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Re: Ratings

Post by elliott70 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:10 pm

And they are based on opinion.<br><br>Look at the ratings that 'we' post on this site.<br>Can you find two that are identical? <p></p><i></i>

Ibleedgreen
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 pm

Re: Ratings

Post by Ibleedgreen » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:13 pm

just means that they are bad judges of talent on other teams too. <p></p><i></i>

boblee
Posts: 9146
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Fargo, ND
Contact:

Re: Ratings

Post by boblee » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:21 pm

Has anyone seen 16-20? <p><br><br>_________________<br><br>BOB</p><i></i>

breakaway shot
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:32 pm

Re: Ratings

Post by breakaway shot » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:46 pm

is grand rapids not on their because their only 6-6? must make sense <p></p><i></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: Ratings

Post by gr19 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:55 pm

If it's based on record then St. Francis and Cambridge should be in the top 5.<br><br>Also, breakaway shot, If team A is undefeated vs. teams B, C, and D, should team A be rated below all three of B, C, and D? <p></p><i></i>

benc14
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:19 pm

Re: Rankings

Post by benc14 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:06 pm

Rapids has beaten 3 of those teams in the top 15 <p></p><i></i>

PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Rankings

Post by PuckU126 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:11 pm

Rapids should at <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>least</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> be 12.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

gr19
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 8:01 am
Location: Anchorage, AK
Contact:

Re: Rankings

Post by gr19 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:20 pm

thank you pucku126. It's not like the GR fans are asking for a 3-9 team with a weak schedule to be ranked. And 12 would be perfectly fine, much higher and it would be unbalanced the other way. <p></p><i></i>

PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Rankings

Post by PuckU126 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:26 pm

You’re welcome GR19.<br><br>As for Rapids, you have to give credit, when credit is due.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

SolanumTuberosum
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:09 pm

Rankings

Post by SolanumTuberosum » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:33 pm

Give LPH a break, they try their best...for the most part they are pretty accurate. look at the rankings some guys on this board have come up with...here's one example that was just recently posted...<br><br>1.AHA<br>2.HILL MURRAY<br>3.GRAND RAPIDS<br>4.CENTENNIAL<br>5.BLOOMINGTON JEFFERSON<br>6.EDEN PRAIRIE<br>7.CRETIN DERHAM HALL<br>8.LAKEVILLE NORTH<br>9.ROSEAU<br>10.BRAINERD<br><br>Grand Rapids 3? <br>Moorhead where?<br>WBL where? <br>Lakeville North 8?<br>Eden Prairie 6? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... berosum</A> at: 1/5/06 7:39 pm<br></i>

PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Rankings

Post by PuckU126 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:42 pm

I wouldn't take those rankings too seriously... the only reason why he put Grand Rapids at No.3 was for sympathy... I know this because it says so right by the name Grand Rapids. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>(SYMPATHY VOTE FOR GR19)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Plus I agree the Spuds and the Bears should be up there too but he may have forgotten them? Just don't forget these are other people's opinions... not everyone is going to agree.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

sfg16
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 1:50 pm

GR19

Post by sfg16 » Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:32 pm

GR19 & PuckU<br> Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... 6>sfg16</A> at: 1/7/06 3:35 pm<br></i>

MajinHockey
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:11 pm

you wanna know what's absurd?

Post by MajinHockey » Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:12 pm

I'll tell you what's absurd. People getting bent out of shape because they think that rankings actually mean something. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Re: Rankings

Post by PuckU126 » Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:21 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>GR19 & PuckU<br>Are you guys for real? You say a team like CDH being number 9 is crazy, however grand rapids should be AT WORST 12. From what I hear grand rapids is 6-6, even with a tough schedule. CDH is 11-1 now, with a 5-0 record in a highly respected Suburban East Conference. I think 9 for CDH is a decent position for them in the state. Grand Rapids being any where near them, maybe even ahead in the rankings is just absurd.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>I never said anything about CDH being ranked 9 was crazy... they should be ranked higher based on their record and accomplishments you stated above. Plus Rapids should be ranked 12 regardless of a 6-6 record. <br>Look at who they <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>defeated:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Cloquet (4-3), Brainerd (4-2), Elk River (3-2), and Lakeville North (2-1)<br>Plus in some of the games <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>they did lose</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, they were not far behind… <br>Apple Valley (1-0), Moorhead (4-2), Eden Prairie (2-1).<br>These loses indicate Rapids was still in the game and they were not out matched by higher ranked teams in the state.<br><br>Read the posts carefully buddy and THINK. PLUS like what I said before: WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS!!! <br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Locked