who will win section 2a?

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Sartell vs Proctor

Post by The hockeywriter » Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:42 am

Well this one will be going on over @ National Hockey Center it will be between the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor Rails (9-16-0) vs Sartell Sabers (11-12-0)</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Should be a good game. Again I will break it down By Postion.<br><br>Goaltending: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sartell</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> In the nets will be Junior Chris Legatt real good goaltender has gotten alot better as the year has gone on he can keep Sartell in it but his one weakness gives off huge rebounds get good shots from the point crash the net and you will get a few goals. But he has gotten alot better.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Beau Davidson will take the nets for the Rails with I hear Quaile being done for the year. This kid is very small in size and I dont understand why but he loves to go down come in and shoot high and you will score with ease look at what he has done the last 3 games of the regular season giving up 7, 11 and 10 goals wow not good numbers heading into playoffs. But it is a new season but in order for the Rails to pull the upset he will need to be big time in the nets.<br><br>Defense: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sartell</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> the leader of the blueline for the sabers is only a freshmen but dont let that fool you Micheal Sauer is a real solid player he plays like a senior at times he has alot of skill got a real nice shot as well. Other good players on the blueline for sartell are Charlie Binsfield and Senior Ryan Fitzthum. They are very young on the blueline but they play like they are alot older.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> the leading man on the Rails is Senior Travis Olson big kid hits really hard and has a big shot but he does lack footspeed which espically against Sartell on the big ice sheet will hurt them. Another really good player is Tony Scherber only a Sophmore but he plays with alot of poise he brings the speed to the Raild D unit. They are going to need to hit sartell hard and slow them up or they will get lit up.<br><br>Forwards: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sartell</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> the big time player here is Bruss I know I say him all the time but he just really impresses me out there very smart good speed and a really nice shot. I just really like him as a player He seems to be there leader out there and he is only a junior. Other good forwards for the Sabers are Jon Stoebe and AJ Hedstrom make up a really nice first line. One thing all the Sartell forwards have is Speed and that will be huge vs Proctor.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> The Rails are lead up front by there 2 big time seniors in Matt Talarico and Ryan Walsh both real good players play a real good style of tough nose northern hockey they could be a huge factor in the game it will be intresting to see how the young Sartell D deal with this to big tough Rails Seniors. Other good forwards for the Rails are Jake Comnick and David Koivisto. This is a solid group up front they forcheck hard and hit hard.<br><br>My Prediction: I think Sartell's speed will be to much for the Rails. But I could see the Forwards of proctor maybe coming out and shocking Sartell by how strong they are and they have more experince they were in this same situation last year they have been here before they believe they can pull the upset. My score <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sartell 6 Proctor 2</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Weak goaltening and all the speed you have to favor Sartell in this one.<br><br>Again guys trying my best here I hope you like these. <p></p><i></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Princeton vs Moose Lake

Post by The hockeywriter » Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:18 am

Well the only game not going in the St.Cloud area tommrow night will be over in Princeton were it will a game between <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Moose Lake (12-9-0) vs Princeton (18-7-0)</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> I think it will be alot closer then people think and could be the big upset of the night maybe????? Again i will break the teams by postion.<br><br>Goaltending: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Moose Lake</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Jake Danelski the senior this is a very underated good goalie who could lead the rebels to the big upset. he will need to play an almost perfect game whcih I think he can do. If Princeton cant get few early and get down by 1 or 2 I think he can hold the lead. He has been solid all year I dont think it will be any different tommrow night.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> It looks like there going to go with Jared Culver the rest of the way he is a decent gaolie makes alot of nice saves but it seems he always gives up a weak one here and there he will need to be on tommrow night I think he will determine rather the Tigers go anywhere this year. He can be very solid but we shall see.<br><br>Defense: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Moose Lake</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> They are lead back there by junior Jeff Klavu a decent D he does some nice things at times other times he makes you scratch your head and go what was he thinking. But if he is on he is a real solid player. Other good players are seniors Adam Johnson and Derek Haugen they make up a at times shaky Blueline but I think they will be on there game tommrow night.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> the best defensive unit in this section is lead by Karl Larsen this kids got the total package wow he hits has great hands sees the ice so well gots nice speed and a real nice shot. It also helps he has Derrick Brown with him who is a real good player along with Charlie Ross and Kyle Jorgenson all 4 make up a real solid D unit. These guys are going to be the reason the Tigers make a run at if they do they are the key to this whole team.<br><br>Forwards: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Moose Lake</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> they are lead by there Junior standout Nick Knezevich he has been reall good all year and has put up nice nunbers with 35 points this year and looking at there stats he was either shut down by Princeton or didnt play . He is the big differnce maker for the Rebels he makes everything go for this team without him this offense is not the same without him. Other good forwards for the Rebels are Aaron Borchardt and Mike Haglund the real threat for the Rebels is Knezevich shut him down and you are on your way to a victory.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> This offensive attack that averages 5 goals a game is lead by there 2 senior standouts Joey Bacon and Kevin Englund. Bacon can really fly out there has a ton of skill he has that scorers touch and Englund has the grit and the heart of a champion he owns the corners I have never seen a player like him before they both are so hard to stop when they are clicking they can give teams and goalie nightmares. Other good Forwards for the Tigers are Travis Schneider, Brandon Pangerl and I got to mention the big guy Cass Bowen. This is a real nice offensive attack it will be hard to stop them.<br><br>My Prediction: It should be all Princeton and I would say that but I think since they just got done killing the Rebels it will be hard to get up for this game and if they come out flat and the Rebels get a couple flukes and Danelski gets hot it could be a huge Rebel Upset I could see it happening. But in all reality My score is <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton 5 Moose Lake 1</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> I think Princeton just has to good of D and too much talent up front to loss. I think the Tigers win here but I think it will be closer and tougher then most think.<br><br>Well there you have it guys it was a plaesure doing the scouting reports I really hope you enjoy them Please give me some feedback on what I need to work on or what you liekd before the next ones. Well tommrow night we go from 8 to 4 the real teams step up and play it should be fun and this Section has a history of Upsets could it happena again I dont know it should be fun to watch. <p></p><i></i>

2ahockeydude
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 11:37 pm

Scouting Reports

Post by 2ahockeydude » Thu Feb 20, 2003 1:38 pm

Well, in a couple of hours the kids'll be on the ice and we'll know who the final four are... But I do want to say that the scouting reports have been VERY well done, and I appreciate the effort that goes into these. <br><br>Who's it gonna be??????<br><br>I still say any of the top five.... as long as everybody plays their "A" games...<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

TheGodofPuck
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 12:47 am

re

Post by TheGodofPuck » Thu Feb 20, 2003 3:43 pm

Cathedral's Watrin broke his arm,and is done for the year. <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Princeton 7-Moose 0

Post by ptown tigers » Thu Feb 20, 2003 9:50 pm

Pretty good game. The tigers were fired up for their last home game. They came out flying. Brandon Pangeral, and Charlie Ross each got a pair of goals, with Karl Larson, Joey Bacon, and Adam Miron each chiming in with one. Despite the score I think Moose's goalie Danelski played a pretty good game. Shots were 48-10, him stopping 41. <br><br>It looks like It will be Princeton and Proctor in the Semis.<br>Does anyone have the SCC Mora score to see who Sauk plays?? <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Scores

Post by ptown tigers » Thu Feb 20, 2003 9:53 pm

SCC 2- Mora 1<br>Sauk4-Denfeld 0<br>Princeton 7-Moose 0<br>I have heard conflicting scores on the Sartell Proctor game, but both have Proctor winning.<br>6-4 is one score and 2-3 is the other. Anyone know the correct one? <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

major siv
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 6:46 pm

Sartell Vs. Proctor

Post by major siv » Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:34 pm

Just talked to a sartell friend, sartell did lose to Proctor 6-4. However, don't know any details. <p></p><i></i>

2ahockeydude
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 11:37 pm

Re: Scores

Post by 2ahockeydude » Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:36 pm

OK, NOW it gets interesting. Especially if it's true that Proctor beat Sartell... didn't see that one coming...<br><br>Princeton v. Proctor - Princeton easily if they don't underestimate this team...<br><br>Sauk v. SCC - Could be interesting... depends on if SCC can contain Pekscamp... I think this could be another barn-burner and could go either way... Goalie dual???<br><br>Princeton should be rested for the final game as whoever wins between Sauk and SCC will be in a battle. NOW, which is the advantage??? Gonna see some good hockey on Saturday, and be sure to stay around for the Tech v. Alexandria game,, this should blow your socks off....<br><br>Okay boys, if you wanna win, you had better be ready to play. It sounds like Sartell wasn't. <br><br>I would bet that the Mora SCC game was a good one, probably a goalie dual.... any insight from anyone??<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

PrincetonVs. Proctor

Post by ptown tigers » Thu Feb 20, 2003 10:41 pm

I really dont think we will underestimate them. They have some talent, and when we played them earlier this year they out played us the first two periods if I remember correctly. If I remember our goaltending kept us in until we started playing the third period. We won 7-3.3<br> <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

djp1321
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 1:54 pm

wow?

Post by djp1321 » Thu Feb 20, 2003 11:37 pm

Never saw that one comming? Anybody have details on Proctor Sartell game? Who scored goals? Shots?...ect. <p></p><i></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Section 2A Playoff Games

Post by The hockeywriter » Fri Feb 21, 2003 1:17 am

Well what a night I think I got to see the best game of the night and the one between SCC vs Mora what a game. Also Looks like we got our big upset with Proctor over Sartell. And Princeton made a big statement with a big 7-0 win over Moose Lake. And the Storm played solid and got a nice 4-0. Now for the reports on the game.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>SCC 2 Mora 1</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>What a game it was back and forth the whole game and yes both goalies played really well tonight. The first period the action was intense with both teams getting there share of chances but neither able to get on by the hot goalies. Then came the second and more of the same But mora took a penalty and SCC took advantage on a nice goal by Eric Dahl it was set up nice by Crandell and Schmidt. That put the Crusaders up 1-0 but then the rest of the period the Mustangs really took it to the Crusaders but could not get anything past Rindelaub he was really solid tonight made big save after big save. But Hjelle was just as good both goalies played great games you hated to see one of them have to lose. But right away in the Third Crandell put in a goal on a nice assist by Dahl this put the Crusaders up 2-0. And again the Mustangs came back strong and it was the Mustang third line yes the third line that got the goal it was scored by Andy Greski assisted by Peterson. That made it 2-1 with about 10 minutes left in the game the rest of the game was real fun to watch so many chances for both team both taking risks. But in the end Rindelaub held strong and the Crusaders came away with the Big Win. They will move on to play another day.<br><br>My 3 Stars Of The Game<br>1.) Joel Rindelaub (SCC) 30 saves tonight huge game for him.<br>2.) Matt Crandell (SCC) 2 points tonight played a big time game.<br>3.) Nick Hjelle (Mora) 25 saves played real well to bad he came up on the short end.<br><br>My Thoughts on the Game: Well it was everything you could ask for great game when looking at the Mustangs season you have to say wow think how good they could have been I mean they were strong all year with always had like half there team think if they could have all got together well still Mustangs great effort tonight you played a real good game. As for SCC big win now up is the Storm you get them on your home ice You need to stop Peckskamp If you can do that and get another solid performance in the nets I think you got a real nice shot at knocking off the Storm.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sauk Rapids 4 Duluth Denfeld 0</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>SAUK RAPIDS ‹ Sophomore forward Peter Abel scored a pair of goals as No. 1 seed Sauk Rapids blanked No. 8 seed Duluth Denfeld in the Section 2A quarterfinals at Sports Arena East.Storm senior goaltender Joe Dagenais recorded his third shut-out of the season and the 10th of his prep career. <br><br> Duluth Denfeld 0 0 0 ‹ 0<br><br> Sauk Rapids 1 2 1 ‹ 4<br><br>First period: 1. SR ‹ Peter Abel (Matt Wocken, Ryan Peckskamp) 5:16.Second period: 2. SR ‹ Peckskamp (unassisted) 1:16 (pp); 3. SR ‹ Peter Abel (Jacob Meierhofer) 13:55.Third period: SR ‹ Corey Cook (unassisted) 11:51.<br><br>Shots-on-goal: DD ‹ 5-5-13 ‹ 23; SCT ‹ 7-16-9 ‹ 32.<br><br>Saves: DD ‹ Brett Omundson (28 saves); SR ‹ Joe Dagenais (23 saves).<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor 6 Sartell 4</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Sophomore David Hines had two goals and an assist to lead No. 3 seed Sartell, but the Sabres wereupset by No. 6 seed Proctor in the Section 2A quarterfinals at National Hockey Center.<br><br>"Proctor came out and hit us hard in the first period," Sartell coach Jereme Fimrite said. "We didn't get the bounces and we didn't convert our breakaways. It was just a tough loss."<br><br>The Sabres lose just five seniors from this year's roster.<br><br> Proctor 2 1 3 ‹ 6<br><br> Sartell 0 2 2 ‹ 4<br><br>First period: 1. P ‹ Jim Peterson (Ben Hanson) 2:05; 2. P ‹ Hanson (Steve Robinson) 7:31.Second period: 3. S ‹ Sean Bryant (Brian Bruss) 4:29; 4. S ‹ David Hines (Bruss) 6:27; 5. P ‹ David Koivisto (Hanson) 14:25 Third period: 6. P ‹ Travis Olson (Koivisto) :29 (PP); 7. S ‹ Noah Kelm (A.J. Hedstrom, Hines) 5:14;8. S ‹ Hines (Bruss) 8:05; 9. P ‹ Tanner Conlon (Ryan Walsh) 8:38; 10. P ‹ Conlon (Walsh) 8:53.<br><br>Shots on goal: P ‹ 8-7-15‹30; S ‹ 10-15-6‹31<br><br>Goaltenders: P ‹ Beau Davidson (27 saves); S ‹ Chris Legatt (24 saves).<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton 7 Moose Lake 0</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Pretty good game. The Tigers were fired up for their last home game. They came out flying. Brandon Pangeral, and Charlie Ross each got a pair of goals, with Karl Larson, Joey Bacon, and Adam Miron each chiming in with one. Despite the score I think Moose's goalie Danelski played a pretty good game. Shots were 48-10, him stopping 41.(thanks p-town tigers) Big win for Princeton were the only big winners tonight.<br><br>My thoughts on the FINAL 4: Well we are down to 4 now Sauk Rapids vs SCC and Proctor vs Princeton. Should both be real good games shoudl be fun to see I will have scouting reports ready by tommrow. Well now 5 teams are done and as Sartell proved tonight if your not ready to play your gonna get beat. Well cant wait till saturday!!!!!<br><br>See all you boys at the MAC!!!!!!!!!!! <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub33.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUser ... writer>The hockeywriter</A> at: 2/22/03 12:41:15 am<br></i>

Excel33
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 11:26 am

Mora vs. SCC

Post by Excel33 » Fri Feb 21, 2003 11:11 am

I also went to that game. It was a fun game like the hockey writer said and both goalies were huge, but Hjelle stacked the pads once and stopped a shot going for the upper right with a kick save, it was the best save I have ever seen in high school hockey. Mora seemed pretty tired to me. They ran three defense and Akkerman probably got 40 minutes of ice time. I disagree with the hockey writer with the goal for mora. Andy Gretsky scored it from the slot on SCC's goalie lower stickhand side. It was an interesting game, I wish Mora would have won. <p></p><i></i>

wingfan12
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 5:54 pm

the Sauk vs SCC

Post by wingfan12 » Fri Feb 21, 2003 5:54 pm

I believe this game will be a big game for sauk. I think that Cathedral will hook and grab and take many penalties trying to stop Peckscamp. This will not work. I think the score will be 4-1 sauk rapids. <p></p><i></i>

wingfan12
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 5:54 pm

Princeton vs Procter

Post by wingfan12 » Fri Feb 21, 2003 5:57 pm

This game won't even be close. Princeton is gonna rail the Procter Rails. The score will be 6-1. <p></p><i></i>

Ahockeyman
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 4:55 pm

Semis

Post by Ahockeyman » Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:46 pm

well, they should be some interesting matchups. I was at the Scc- Mora game and that was really close. If St cloud's goalie keeps playing like that they might have a chance .<br>Like everyone, i was surprised to see sartell go down so early. It looks like proctor isn't ready to cash it in yet.<br><br><br>Proctor- Princeton<br><br>Proctor pulled off one victory can they get two? The answer is no. Princeton is quite a good looking team and they always come to play during playoff season. i don't see proctor controlling Bacon , Englung and Schnieder.<br>Prediction:<br><br>Princeton 5 Proctor 3<br><br><br><br>Sauk- SCC<br><br>I think SR is too powerful for this team for SCC. Even with St cloud on thier game it doesnt look possible for them to beat SR. SR is just a much better team and their goaltending is too strong.<br>Prediction:<br><br>SR 3 SCC 1<br><br><br>Well only thing we can do now is wait and see how it pans out.<br> <p></p><i></i>

2ahockeydude
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 11:37 pm

Re: Semis

Post by 2ahockeydude » Fri Feb 21, 2003 11:13 pm

I don't think the game between Proctor and Princeton will be that close, but it depends on the Tigers getting over confident or not. Priceton 5 - 1<br><br>Sauk and SCC, before Sauk's injuries, I would have agreed, but I just don't know if Sauk can keep Pekscamp out there enough to make a difference. This could be a defensive battle more than an offensive one. If Sauk doesn't win big, and if it's close I predict SCC.. <br><br>OK boys, drop the puck and let's take 'er down to the final two.... <br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

major siv
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 6:46 pm

SCC

Post by major siv » Fri Feb 21, 2003 11:32 pm

If my mind dosn't fail me, i beleve i heard that someone from scc broke their arm or something... Is that going to effect there team very much during thease final games? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub33.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUser ... mnhs>major siv</A> at: 2/21/03 11:40:45 pm<br></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Section 2A Semi-Finals

Post by The hockeywriter » Sat Feb 22, 2003 1:20 am

Well we are down to 4 and it should be 2 close games tommrow I think it is whoever showes up ready to play will win. It should be fun you have seen my reports on all the teams so I am just going to do my Prediction for both games.<br><br>Alright the first game of the day will be between the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sauk Rapids Storm (14-11-1) vs St.Cloud Cathedral Crusaders (16-7-1)</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> This should be a really good game it is going to come down to a team with alot of depth in SCC and a team with 3 big guns in Sauk Rapids I think if SCC can find a way to shut down Peckskamp they will win but doing that is going to be a really tough task. Also I will like to see how both goalies perform in this game I think Deganais has been solid all year and will continue that trend but can the Rindelaub repeat his performance from Thursday. All thses things make for a really good game. It should be fun to see I have been a big non-supporter of SCC all year long but I do have to give credit where credit is due and yes boys you got a nice squad and I wish you good lukc. On Sauk I have a ton of respect for you boys you are doing this with 3 guys I mean wowo you are real solid club good luck to you as well. Well I a excited to see what happens.<br>My Final Score: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sauk Rapids 3 SCC 1</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> I thin Pesckamp will be to much and Dagnenis will be big in the nets.<br><br>The second game of the day should be a real good one as well as it features the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Princeton Tigers (19-7-0) vs Proctor Rails (10-16-0)</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> should be a fun one. The defending champ vs the cinderilla story. Now everyone on here is say Princeton big I am here to say it will go down to the wire I think Proctor will give the tigers all they want and a little more. My big points are can the Goaltending of Princeton stand up I mean They will get tested this game it should be intresting. For Proctor can they keep a nice speed and slow the game down to there speed cause if they let Pricneton skate wild the game will get ugly fast. Na dwill the little guy in the nets from Proctor have another big game he will need to cause he will eb tested it should be fun to see how these teams do. To The Proctor team you show alot by going down to Sartell and wiunning I think you will pull an upset tommrow night and will be playing in the section finals so good luck men. To Princeton I have went against you before and you have proven me wrong can you do it again prove to me your a big time team with your play tommrow I wish the Tigers the best of luck to.<br>My Final Score: <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Proctor 7 Princeton 5</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> I just think the Tigers might be looking past the Rails and I think the Rails will get up huge early on and just hang on for the win.<br><br>Well this should be fun tommrow 4 real good teams doing battle I mean this is your season boys you take a period off or now with all these temas beinbg so equal a shift off you will be doing going gall what could have been well boys come ready to play. I wish all 4 the best of luck and we will be down to 2 before we know it so have fun tommorw men!!!! Also for you hockey nuts I think later on in the evening Alex vs Tech will eb going on if so i will be there i suggest you all come watch to That will be a great AA Semi game. Well i will have reports on the games tommrow night. And everyone go out and work hard and have fun. <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Proctor vs. Princeton

Post by ptown tigers » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:18 am

I have got to disagree with you. Usually you are a right on the nose, but I dont understand how you can say we will be overconfident. We learned our lesson once this season(Cambridge). It will not happen again. Princeton is ready to go. Proctor played us real tough last time, our goalie saved us last time against proctor. They outplayed us two periods. We outplayed them the third but luckily our goalie held tough the entire game.I dont think anyone from Princeton has been cocky or over confident all season(well maybe playing Becker). I think it is going to be a great game, very tough and I think it will be close, but I just dont see Proctor winning it. <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

On Princeton

Post by The hockeywriter » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:24 am

Well Princeton has a great team I have said it all along they are a really strong team who is so deep and has great team speed but they do have a huge weakness and it is in between the pipes no offense but I reall dont know if it will hold up who is starting tommrow for you ?????? Nad who started against Proctor the the first time ???? Pleae answer these for me I would really like the answers Bvut yes if they are ready to go and not over looking them they beat up the Rails but we shall see. Please answer those questions for me. <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Re: Proctor vs. Princeton

Post by ptown tigers » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:27 am

I am not quite sure who started against us, It may have been their backup cause I have heard their starter has back problems. Is he playing again? As for us unless Culver gets hurt they are sticking with him for the remainder of the playoffs. <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Re: On Princeton

Post by The hockeywriter » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:34 am

Was Culver the goalie who kept you in the game up in proctor or was it osmundesen ?????? please answer also tell all the boys i wish them the best of luck they are very fun to watch. <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Re: Proctor vs. Princeton

Post by ptown tigers » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:38 am

It was Osmundson, and I will make sure to tell them. Espiecally Big Boy Bowen. He get's his Jollies when you mention him in the scouting reports. <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

The hockeywriter
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 5:35 pm

Re: On Princeton

Post by The hockeywriter » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:45 am

Well ok hopfully Culver can do as good as Osmundson he really was on fire there and then thye just went to Culver what happened did Osmundsen get in trouble why he loss the starting job??? just a question But ohh yes well I work hard on the teams and I like to mention as many kids as I can but I like the big boy Bowen the reason for Princetons latest surge here is cause of that all senior line they have been huge but yes Tell them good luck you guys got a real nice squad I am actually hoping you win cause if you do the Final satys at the MAC and doesnt go to Cloquet which would save me alot of gas money. But I am really wondering on what happened in the nets for you tigers??? <p></p><i></i>

ptown tigers
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 3:06 am

Re: Proctor vs. Princeton

Post by ptown tigers » Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:51 am

I believe it was because He had a bad game against Chisago, and then the next game Culver had a good game. It is really tough to tell who is better though. They are both pretty equal if you ask me. <p>Good Teams Would be Nothin without Good Water.....</p><i></i>

Locked