Page 1 of 1

SCC v. Sartel

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:02 pm
by quackattackisback
Any predictions out there on the SCC v. Sartel Game tomorrow? <p></p><i></i>

Re: SCC v. Sartel

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:18 pm
by Sabreman86
First of all, there are two L's in Sartell. <br><br>About a week ago I would have said that this game would be a blow out, but due to a couple of the SCC scrimmage scores, (i know they were just scrimmages but you can tell a little bit from them) I think that SCC will sqeak out a close one (2-1). It will probably be low scoring because it seems as if SCC has been having difficulty with scoring, and Sartell will have difficulty controlling the play in the offensive zone. In order for Sartell to win this game, their goalie will have to keep his head in it and realize that he will probably see 30-40 shots. Also, they will just have to capitalize on any chance they get, because I dont think they will get very many. Should be a fun game to watch in any case, I wish I could be there... <p></p><i></i>

whoopty doo

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:21 pm
by 2AhockeyOldTimer
Two L's or one Sartell will get beat by 3 plus. Look for the best three players on the ice to be Noack, Crandell, and Schmidt. And look for a point plus out of all of them.<br> <p>2A</p><i></i>

Re: whoopty doo

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:26 pm
by WildFan24
Haha do that many people really care about this topic? Sartell or SCC there both jokes compared to the decent top 10 teams.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Marxist Revolution <p></p><i></i>

hockey

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:03 pm
by oldschool
Very intelligent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>so,your saying that some of the top ten teams aren't decent??????????????????????? <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:06 pm
by puckhead89
Don't worry about him oldschool....he can't use the correct "their" in his sentence either......from Wild's posts it appears we should always respond with the rolling eyes emoticon and leave it at that, eh? <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:07 am
by Sabreman86
Actually, if we are going to get really picky with grammar, I would have used "are" as in "Sartell and SCC are nothing compared to the top ten." <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:55 am
by scottparker
We probably should stick with hockey and leave the use of the English language alone.. I for one make my share of mistakes. <br><br>(I do hate it when someone misuses "there" and "their", but I'm not going to throw stones...)<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:15 am
by puckhead89
Sabreman, you are right! They taught you well in Sartell! <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:49 am
by Sabreman86
Yep, thats the Sartell edumacation for you<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Any other predictions for the game though? <p></p><i></i>

Re: hockey

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:01 pm
by hockeylife79
if SCC's forwards play like they can, 5-1<br>if SCC's forwards play mediocre, 3-2 <p></p><i></i>

Final Score

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:48 pm
by Sabreman86
SCC-3<br>Sartell-1 <p></p><i></i>