Section 4AA

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Section 4AA

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

As of today, this is how I see things.

1). Hill-Murray
2). White Bear
3). Stillwater
4). Tartan
5). N. St. Paul
6). Moundsview
7). Roseville
8 ). St. Paul Como
9). St. Paul Saints
Last edited by Pioneerprideguy on Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
Last edited by Goldfishdude on Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

I guess I should have clarified...as of right now, this is how I see the final seedings coming out. I see WB beating Still again down the road & see Tartan with 3-4 more losses. NSP is a potential sleeper.
stilly5hm3
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:41 pm

Post by stilly5hm3 »

Sec conference game white bear beats stilly 4 2, section semis stilly beats white bear 3 1, section finals the pride of all the wannabe hockey fans and spectators(pioneers) go down 5 3 to the ponies of stillwater, state tourney birth for the ponies(a first) and the enrollement at hm drops by 1 or 2 a year for the foreseeable future :wink:
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
Spooge
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:29 pm

Post by Spooge »

BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
Yeah, cuz the SW vs HM Dbl-OT Section Final last yr was a real yawner :roll:
youngblood08
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm

Post by youngblood08 »

No. 3 Hill-Murray (89.8) 4 0 0 16 1 1 5.3 1.6 Won 9
No. 22 Stillwater Area (61.4) 4 1 0 9 7 2 3.8 2.9 None
No. 25 White Bear Lake (60.7) 2 3 0 10 7 1 3.6 3.3 Won 1
No. 27 Tartan (57.4) 1 1 1 10 6 1 3.9 2.8 Lost 1
No. 36 North St. Paul (49.6) 2 2 0 10 7 0 5.1 3.0 Lost 1
No. 38 Mounds View (48.5) 2 2 1 8 8 2 3.3 3.0 Won 1
No. 44 Roseville (43.6) 1 5 0 5 12 1 2.2 3.0 Won 1
No. 66 St. Paul Como Park (28.9) 1 1 0 5 10 1 2.8 4.9 Lost 3
No. 70 St. Paul Saints (16.8)

This is from Mn-scores.net. strength of schedule and opponents.

That WBL/Stillwater game will be huge. I see the winner at #2 andd loser at #4 due to NSP weaker schedule. Also big factor NSP/MV to finish the season for both.
got some
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by got some »

Spooge wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
Yeah, cuz the SW vs HM Dbl-OT Section Final last yr was a real yawner :roll:
I couldn't agree more!!! :lol:
Go-Wild!
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:14 am

Post by Go-Wild! »

youngblood08 wrote:No. 3 Hill-Murray (89.8) 4 0 0 16 1 1 5.3 1.6 Won 9
No. 22 Stillwater Area (61.4) 4 1 0 9 7 2 3.8 2.9 None
No. 25 White Bear Lake (60.7) 2 3 0 10 7 1 3.6 3.3 Won 1
No. 27 Tartan (57.4) 1 1 1 10 6 1 3.9 2.8 Lost 1
No. 36 North St. Paul (49.6) 2 2 0 10 7 0 5.1 3.0 Lost 1
No. 38 Mounds View (48.5) 2 2 1 8 8 2 3.3 3.0 Won 1
No. 44 Roseville (43.6) 1 5 0 5 12 1 2.2 3.0 Won 1
No. 66 St. Paul Como Park (28.9) 1 1 0 5 10 1 2.8 4.9 Lost 3
No. 70 St. Paul Saints (16.8)

This is from Mn-scores.net. strength of schedule and opponents.

That WBL/Stillwater game will be huge. I see the winner at #2 andd loser at #4 due to NSP weaker schedule. Also big factor NSP/MV to finish the season for both.
When is the meeting to determine where the teams are seeded? I believe the seedings last year were determined the Saturday morning before NSP and Moundsview played their last game of the season. The results of NSP vs Moundsview won't matter if that is the case again this year.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
I based my statement, because, according to Hockey Hub, Stillwater is 7-3-2 with 16 pts and WBL is 7-3-1 with 15 pts. WBL has a game in hand. I realize I am a journalism major, and not a math major, but last I checked, 16 pts is more than 15 points. I don't need to work in a bank to figure that out!!! :wink:

And Youngblood supports my rationale with the current rankings. They're close, no question.
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7270
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

Goldfishdude wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
I based my statement, because, according to Hockey Hub, Stillwater is 7-3-2 with 16 pts and WBL is 7-3-1 with 15 pts. WBL has a game in hand. I realize I am a journalism major, and not a math major, but last I checked, 16 pts is more than 15 points. I don't need to work in a bank to figure that out!!! :wink:

And Youngblood supports my rationale with the current rankings. They're close, no question.
Now I know why I'm not taking a drink of water or Propel when I read these. I'd have "Propelled" water on my computer screen. Image

Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
mngophs04
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:22 pm

Post by mngophs04 »

Hey, do these seedings even matter? You know what happened to the #1 seed last year... :lol:
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

mngophs04 wrote:Hey, do these seedings even matter? You know what happened to the #1 seed last year... :lol:
I don't care who ya are, that's funny right there..... :lol:
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

mngophs04 wrote:Hey, do these seedings even matter? You know what happened to the #1 seed last year... :lol:
Hmmmm..... not sure what you're referring to gophs!!! Maybe you might need to remind some of us!!!! :shock: :wink:
mngophs04
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:22 pm

Post by mngophs04 »

Goldfishdude wrote:
mngophs04 wrote:Hey, do these seedings even matter? You know what happened to the #1 seed last year... :lol:
Hmmmm..... not sure what you're referring to gophs!!! Maybe you might need to remind some of us!!!! :shock: :wink:
Let's just say it didn't help them any. :wink:
besthockeyfan
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:17 am

Post by besthockeyfan »

stilly5hm3 wrote:Sec conference game white bear beats stilly 4 2, section semis stilly beats white bear 3 1, section finals the pride of all the wannabe hockey fans and spectators(pioneers) go down 5 3 to the ponies of stillwater, state tourney birth for the ponies(a first) and the enrollement at hm drops by 1 or 2 a year for the foreseeable future :wink:
Why do I sense a hint of bitterness from this statement?
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

mngophs04 wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:
mngophs04 wrote:Hey, do these seedings even matter? You know what happened to the #1 seed last year... :lol:
Hmmmm..... not sure what you're referring to gophs!!! Maybe you might need to remind some of us!!!! :shock: :wink:
Let's just say it didn't help them any. :wink:
Gophs..... not the answer I was looking for, but... I guess I should commend you on being politically correct for not taking my bait!! =D>
gophs16
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 2:25 pm

Post by gophs16 »

Would love to see another Hill-WBL matchup and a HM-Stillwater matchup, or even a Stillwater-WBL, I just know these games will be the hardest played around the state. All three teams hate eachother.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

Goldfishdude wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:I would flip flop Stillwater at 2, for NOW, with WBL, but I am not totally sold Tartan isn't ahead of WBL....

In some common opponents, WBL was throttled by St. Thomas and Tartan lost 7-5 and 5-2. tartan lost to H-M 3-0, while WBL lost 5-0 and 4-3. Both beat Rochester Century, and a tie to MV for Tartan and a loss for WBL. Tartan is 10-6-1, and the fact that WBL had players suspended is even more reason not to reward them ahead of Tartan.

So, at best, H-M, Stillwater, Tartan, WBL and MV.......
GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
I based my statement, because, according to Hockey Hub, Stillwater is 7-3-2 with 16 pts and WBL is 7-3-1 with 15 pts. WBL has a game in hand. I realize I am a journalism major, and not a math major, but last I checked, 16 pts is more than 15 points. I don't need to work in a bank to figure that out!!! :wink:

And Youngblood supports my rationale with the current rankings. They're close, no question.
Suburban East Conference Standings
Team (QRF) Conf. Overall For Agst Streak
W L T W L T AVG AVG
Woodbury 9 1 2 11 6 2 3.7 2.9 None
Cretin-Derham Hall 9 3 0 13 6 0 3.5 2.7 Won 3
White Bear Lake 7 3 1 10 7 1 3.6 3.3 Won 1
Forest Lake 7 3 2 10 5 2 3.5 2.3 Lost 2
Stillwater Area 7 3 2 9 7 2 3.8 2.9 None
Mounds View 5 7 0 8 8 2 3.3 3.0 Won 1
Hastings 4 7 1 7 10 1 2.9 4.3 Lost 1
Roseville 3 8 1 5 12 1 2.2 3.0 Won 1
Park of Cottage Grove 3 8 1 4 13 1 2.7 4.8 Lost 4
East Ridge 1 12 0 3 15 1 2.0 4.9 Lost 4


And you can take that to the bank! :twisted:
wbmd
Posts: 3893
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:
BodyShots wrote: GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
I based my statement, because, according to Hockey Hub, Stillwater is 7-3-2 with 16 pts and WBL is 7-3-1 with 15 pts. WBL has a game in hand. I realize I am a journalism major, and not a math major, but last I checked, 16 pts is more than 15 points. I don't need to work in a bank to figure that out!!! :wink:

And Youngblood supports my rationale with the current rankings. They're close, no question.
Suburban East Conference Standings
Team (QRF) Conf. Overall For Agst Streak
W L T W L T AVG AVG
Woodbury 9 1 2 11 6 2 3.7 2.9 None
Cretin-Derham Hall 9 3 0 13 6 0 3.5 2.7 Won 3
White Bear Lake 7 3 1 10 7 1 3.6 3.3 Won 1
Forest Lake 7 3 2 10 5 2 3.5 2.3 Lost 2
Stillwater Area 7 3 2 9 7 2 3.8 2.9 None
Mounds View 5 7 0 8 8 2 3.3 3.0 Won 1
Hastings 4 7 1 7 10 1 2.9 4.3 Lost 1
Roseville 3 8 1 5 12 1 2.2 3.0 Won 1
Park of Cottage Grove 3 8 1 4 13 1 2.7 4.8 Lost 4
East Ridge 1 12 0 3 15 1 2.0 4.9 Lost 4


And you can take that to the bank! :twisted:
East Ridge hasn't won any conference games. Their win against Forest Lake was in a tournament.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

BodyShots wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:
BodyShots wrote: GFD, you can't put Still ahead of the Bears at this point in time. WBL is ahead of them in the standings, and they beat them head to head.

Now the Bears just need to make sure they get seeded #2 or #3. We don't want HM vs WBL in a semi-final game again like last year. It makes the final almost anti-climatic. :wink:
I based my statement, because, according to Hockey Hub, Stillwater is 7-3-2 with 16 pts and WBL is 7-3-1 with 15 pts. WBL has a game in hand. I realize I am a journalism major, and not a math major, but last I checked, 16 pts is more than 15 points. I don't need to work in a bank to figure that out!!! :wink:

And Youngblood supports my rationale with the current rankings. They're close, no question.
Suburban East Conference Standings
Team (QRF) Conf. Overall For Agst Streak
W L T W L T AVG AVG
Woodbury 9 1 2 11 6 2 3.7 2.9 None
Cretin-Derham Hall 9 3 0 13 6 0 3.5 2.7 Won 3
White Bear Lake 7 3 1 10 7 1 3.6 3.3 Won 1
Forest Lake 7 3 2 10 5 2 3.5 2.3 Lost 2
Stillwater Area 7 3 2 9 7 2 3.8 2.9 None
Mounds View 5 7 0 8 8 2 3.3 3.0 Won 1
Hastings 4 7 1 7 10 1 2.9 4.3 Lost 1
Roseville 3 8 1 5 12 1 2.2 3.0 Won 1
Park of Cottage Grove 3 8 1 4 13 1 2.7 4.8 Lost 4
East Ridge 1 12 0 3 15 1 2.0 4.9 Lost 4


And you can take that to the bank! :twisted:
Body... I apologize.. I was confusing THIS thread with the thread about Stillwater and CDH being the favorties for the SEC.

http://www.ushsho.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=22556

I was correct about the conference standings, but you are correct with the overall standings. However, I still seed Stillwater over WBL, because that's my opinion, and Stillwater is my favorite SEC team.
WBL superfan (S)
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: White Bear Lake

Post by WBL superfan (S) »

Section Final WBL vs Hill

I dont want to get my hopes up cause WBL always finds a way to lose in the section final but you never know, all i know is that WBL has the best fans in the state
:D
sachishi4
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: SLP

Post by sachishi4 »

you keep tellin yourself that. eventually, you will win a prize for it
State ‘83, ‘91, ‘08, ‘20
wblhockeyfan8
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:37 pm
Location: White Bear Lake, MN. Front row of the student section.

Post by wblhockeyfan8 »

Usually I don't approve of anything Sachi has to say :wink:, but that was damn funny! :lol:
Always celly hard.
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

I think things are starting to solidify more after last night's games.

1). HM
2). WB
3). Tartan
4). Still
5). NSP
6). MV
7). Rose
8 ). Como
9). Saints

The only real potential movement could be Tartan & Stillwater. Those two could flip flop depending how they finish. Obviously, Tartan has the tougher schedule, but right now they are the higher seed and have a slight buffer. How this plays out is significant because of the first round match up with NSP....you definately don't wanna go down that path. The semi match up with either HM or WB shouldn't matter as I don't see a whole lot of difference between these two right now. WB is playing much better and HM is solid, but hasn't progressed as much as WB has. Should be interesting....as usual.
Post Reply