Ratings/Rankings success

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
NumberCruncher
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:45 pm

Ratings/Rankings success

Post by NumberCruncher »

Has anyone checked to see how successful any ranking system did during the section seedings? PageStat2, StarTrib, Mitch Hawker, ...

Or should we divvy the work?
That is all,
NumberCruncher
HShockeywatcher
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm

Post by HShockeywatcher »

east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7270
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Re: Ratings/Rankings success

Post by east hockey »

NumberCruncher wrote:Has anyone checked to see how successful any ranking system did during the section seedings? PageStat2, StarTrib, Mitch Hawker, ...

Or should we divvy the work?
PageStat ended up +5 against the seedings, Mitch's system (he really needs to give his system a name :mrgreen: ) ended up +7

Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 »

Nice way to avenge last years loss, serves the coaches right for "winning" last year :D


What does the yearly series with Mitch look like?
karl(east)
Posts: 6462
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Contact:

Post by karl(east) »

Congrats to the computers for breaking their losing streak. :lol:

I'll give my own rankings a thorough review over the tourney so I can learn from them for next year.
NumberCruncher
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:45 pm

Post by NumberCruncher »

I would love to collectively start from scratch and make some new numbers. Or if we could get a thorough explanation of pagestat besides what we get in the faq
That is all,
NumberCruncher
Post Reply