Game 2 of 2: Hibbing/Chisholm@ Int'l Falls, Thursday 7:30pm

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Who takes Game #2 at Bronco Arena???

Poll ended at Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:41 pm

Int'l Falls Broncos
9
47%
Hibbing/Chisholm Bluejackets
9
47%
OT TIE
1
5%
 
Total votes: 19

ryno44
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:01 pm

Post by ryno44 »

DeCenzo adds another.... 5-0 Hibbing.
ryno44
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:01 pm

Post by ryno44 »

6-0 Hibbing. running time
ryno44
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:01 pm

Post by ryno44 »

7-0
mnhockeynemn
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Hockeytown, USA

Post by mnhockeynemn »

Terrible game for the Broncos. Gotta hand it for Dicenzo and Adam Johnson, they made this game for Hibbing. Hibbing Def overpowered the Falls tonight.
Northern Minnesota, Now that's real Hockey!
range_hockeyfan_79
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:03 am

Post by range_hockeyfan_79 »

ryno44 wrote:7-0
Way to go Hibbing!!! This game Hibbing played like they were in the beginning of the season. Nice win Hibbing carry that out to the Rapids game!!!

GO BLUEJACKETS!!!
ryno44
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:01 pm

Post by ryno44 »

range_hockeyfan_79 wrote:
ryno44 wrote:7-0
Way to go Hibbing!!! This game Hibbing played like they were in the beginning of the season. Nice win Hibbing carry that out to the Rapids game!!!

GO BLUEJACKETS!!!
Definitly a nice win for the bluejackets, glad to see them bounce back after a rough Proctor loss and pound the broncos. I feel bad for the guy who never got to throw the fish onto the ice :D

Great time to get some momentum to carry into the next games.
house69
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:21 pm

Post by house69 »

PhilRudd wrote:Hard to believe there are 16 posts on this thread - yawn. Neither of these teams are very talented, but the Jackets seem to have Falls' number. Better luck in the future boys.

PR 8)
How did hibbing do tonight? I think they won 7-0. they just had a few bad games and that happens look at hermantown for losing to cloquet.
Proctors not that good
bronco2828
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:18 pm

Post by bronco2828 »

Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.
INDUS
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:05 am

HIBBING/FALLS

Post by INDUS »

The refs don't know how to call a hockey game anymore. There maybe should have been about 3-4 penalties in the game, they were terrible for both teams. The Decenzo's have always been like that, I don't know why the refs even talk to them, if there is something critical to disgust then talk to them, but otherwise tell them to stick it!!
mnhockeynemn
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Hockeytown, USA

Post by mnhockeynemn »

bronco2828 wrote:Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.
Its pretty well known that he argues with all calls not in his favor. I dont even think the refs take him seriously anymore.
Northern Minnesota, Now that's real Hockey!
ryno44
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:01 pm

Post by ryno44 »

bronco2828 wrote:Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.
Always gotta find something to b**** about don't ya?
TopDrawer
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:17 am

Post by TopDrawer »

I heard the Bronco coach wanted to fight one of his players after the game, it sounds like a real mess they have up there.
bronco2828
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:18 pm

Post by bronco2828 »

ryno44 wrote:
bronco2828 wrote:Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.
Always gotta find something to b**** about don't ya?
Yep.......when it involves a coach turning a fast paced paced hockey game into a slow political debate.....It gets old ryno44........unless you enjoy watching Decenzo stop the game on every questionable call made........funny how you don't see college or pro coaches do it.
upnorthgoon
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:23 am

Saying something is a lot better then not saying anything

Post by upnorthgoon »

[quote="bronco2828"]Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.[/quote]

Sure if you find it is nececary to sit back and say nothing and let the game flow don't question the ref. The only reason Decenzo questions what he considers to be "controversial" calls is so he can buy time for his first line players. Five minutes wasted complaining to the ref is five more minutes for these players to catch their breath.
dirtracing17
Posts: 362
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:50 am
Location: victory lane

Re: Saying something is a lot better then not saying anythin

Post by dirtracing17 »

upnorthgoon wrote:
bronco2828 wrote:Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.
Sure if you find it is nececary to sit back and say nothing and let the game flow don't question the ref. The only reason Decenzo questions what he considers to be "controversial" calls is so he can buy time for his first line players. Five minutes wasted complaining to the ref is five more minutes for these players to catch their breath.
when you talk about buying time for his first line, that shows you have no clue since johnson and decenzo are no longer on the same line, they had new lines for that game and they looked pretty good, more than one line can score and that will definitly help them out
you can live in your car, but can't race your house
upnorthgoon
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 9:23 am

Re: Saying something is a lot better then not saying anythin

Post by upnorthgoon »

[quote="dirtracing17"][quote="upnorthgoon"][quote="bronco2828"]Bad loss for the Broncos. Give credit where it's due. Bluejackets came to play and the Broncos didn't. A few soft goals, but the Broncos couldn't put nothing together to respond. Question: Why does Coach Decenzo and his staff have to dispute most of the calls against his team, even when they are up and in control of the game? One of their coaches are also yapping at the refs going off the ice after a period. It gets old.[/quote]

Sure if you find it is nececary to sit back and say nothing and let the game flow don't question the ref. The only reason Decenzo questions what he considers to be "controversial" calls is so he can buy time for his first line players. Five minutes wasted complaining to the ref is five more minutes for these players to catch their breath.[/quote]

when you talk about buying time for his first line, that shows you have no clue since johnson and decenzo are no longer on the same line, they had new lines for that game and they looked pretty good, more than one line can score and that will definitly help them out[/quote]

I never said that those two were on the same line. But i guarantee that he questions to by time for his players wether its his first line or not.
Post Reply