2014 NIT SCORES

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:32 pm

Does anyone have scores from NIT?

Nevertoomuchhockey · Post by **Nevertoomuchhockey** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:40 pm

See also: NIT thread on the AAA board.

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:54 pm

Get over yourself...there over a 100 Mn high school girls playing in the tourney.
These kids have been discussed constantly throughout this forum.

The same can be said for the boys when they have the CCM NIT. The league is a constant discussion on the high school forum.

D6 Girls Fan · Post by **D6 Girls Fan** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:08 pm

But it's not HS hockey. Why do you need to clog this forum up with this? If you guys and gals want to see your kids names online, do it on the AAA thread. Not sure why this is still an issue, mods?

CoyoteWheels · Post by **CoyoteWheels** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:01 pm

D6 Girls Fan wrote:But it's not HS hockey. Why do you need to clog this forum up with this? If you guys and gals want to see your kids names online, do it on the AAA thread. Not sure why this is still an issue, mods?

D6,

Make yourself useful and track down the scores!

Can't we all just love one another:)

CoyoteWheels · Post by **CoyoteWheels** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:41 pm

Final score of the SSM 19U VS Chicago Mission 19U

SSM 4 to CM 2 final score.

Tied 2 to 2 late in the 3rd. CM scored 1 on themselves then SSM got a empty netter to spread the lead to 4 to 2.

Great game!

Can't we all just love one another:)

mnhockeyguy2014 · Post by **mnhockeyguy2014** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:13 am

Please quit being a deusch and support girls hockey! ALL the MN Elite teams (6) are in tourney! What is your problem??

Nevertoomuchhockey · Post by **Nevertoomuchhockey** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:18 am

mnhockeyguy2014 wrote:
Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:See also: NIT thread on the AAA board.
Please quit being a deusch and support girls hockey! ALL the MN Elite teams (5) are in tourney! What is your problem??

That first sentence.
Fuel for so many comments.
Priceless.

CoyoteWheels · Post by **CoyoteWheels** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:29 am

Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:
mnhockeyguy2014 wrote:
Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:See also: NIT thread on the AAA board.
Please quit being a deusch and support girls hockey! ALL the MN Elite teams (5) are in tourney! What is your problem??
That first sentence.
Fuel for so many comments.
Priceless.

NTMH,

After taking care of your hygiene this morning you should come up and watch some high school aged girls play some hockey. Good stuff:)

Can't we all just love one another:)

u12dad · Post by **u12dad** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:08 pm

Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:See also: NIT thread on the AAA board.

SSM U19 vs Elite Black for National Championship
Elite White vs Elite Red 3rd

Elite Grey vs Revolution Black for American Championship
Elite Royal vs CYA 16 for 3rd

mnhockeyguy2014 · Post by **mnhockeyguy2014** » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:40 pm

u12dad wrote:
Nevertoomuchhockey wrote:See also: NIT thread on the AAA board.
SSM U19 vs Elite Black for National Championship
Elite White vs Elite Red 3rd

Elite Grey vs Revolution Black for American Championship
Elite Royal vs CYA 16 for 3rd

CORRECTION!

SSM 16U vs Mad Caps 16U for 3rd in American

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:27 pm

Good hockey weekend watching NIT...
Got to see numerous girls play that I have never seen play and it was a pleasure.Makes the upcoming MSHS LEAGUE season more interesting and fun .

u12dad · Post by **u12dad** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:41 pm

nu2hockey wrote:Good hockey weekend watching NIT...
Got to see numerous girls play that I have never seen play and it was a pleasure.Makes the upcoming MSHS LEAGUE season more interesting and fun .

Finals
Elite Black 2-1 over SSM in National

Elite Grey 4-3 over Revolution Black in American

alcloseshaver · Post by **alcloseshaver** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:45 pm

Why were both Rev. Teams in the U16 bracket? Was there an imbalance of teams?

alcloseshaver · Post by **alcloseshaver** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:54 pm

D6 Girls Fan wrote:But it's not HS hockey. Why do you need to clog this forum up with this? If you guys and gals want to see your kids names online, do it on the AAA thread. Not sure why this is still an issue, mods?

Are we really worried about Clogging up the girls forum???

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:07 pm

Not sure, but, there where 4 pools of 3 teams in both national and american (Revolution teams in american)
It appears they may have been used to balance the american
also 3 elite teams in each tourney

Nevertoomuchhockey · Post by **Nevertoomuchhockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:49 pm

nu2hockey wrote:Good hockey weekend watching NIT...
Got to see numerous girls play that I have never seen play and it was a pleasure.Makes the upcoming MSHS LEAGUE season more interesting and fun .

This makes no sense, unless you recently moved here or haven't watched any girls hockey the last 8+ years. With few exceptions, these players have been leading the 96 97 98 birth years season after season.

Plus your reply re: 2x Rev 16s also doesn't answer his question. Elite red white black don't play your teams at all right? So did 10 girls sit this weekend out or were they not really 16u?

I get you are excited about your daughters team, but getting pumped up for the HIGH SCHOOL SEASON seems a strange statement since you obviously haven't watched much in previous years (since you don't recognize these players) and BE won't be playing against any MSHL high school teams after 10/27.

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 10:10 pm

First time going to NIT..
Many of the girls i am unfamiliar with play on teams that i have not seen play.(recognize many names though)
I am new to the cities.(little over 2years)
Don't know about 2 U16 Revolution teams, but they had two teams in american side
No daughter playing but close family friend has 10u , 12u, and just grad hs.

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 10:41 pm

FYI , not all the girls were 96,97,and 98 birth years
It was pointed out to me that kids with birth yrs of
99,00, and 01 were playing and playing well.

Nevertoomuchhockey · Post by **Nevertoomuchhockey** » Sun Oct 19, 2014 11:43 pm

Not on black red white. Not on any elite league teams. If there were any 7th 8th 9th graders playing 19u I would sure like to hear who.

My point was that if you had seen any girls hockey in the last 8 years, most if not all of these names would be familiar.

Guess the guy who "pointed it out to you" is also "nu2hockey."

nu2hockey · Post by **nu2hockey** » Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:00 am

Nope, an OS coach for one of the Elite teams was filling us in

P.s. The Royal elite team is U19 and has a 9th grader playing

The SSM U16 has played all of the Elite teams using 99,00,and 01 players

U10Father · Post by **U10Father** » Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:18 am

What's the point of this discussion? Nobody mentions names, out of respect for underage young girls. So we hear names of temporary teams which won't play together past next week. And we have scores reported on games that are nothing more than glorified scrimmages, the results of which won't be remembered.

Yes, yes, go ahead and post childish insults about me. But this is a Girls HS discussion board, and none of these posts are talking about HS hockey. Since apparently there are no moderators, it won't get moved where it should.

Thank god tryouts start next week and this goes away.

Bulldog3489 · Post by **Bulldog3489** » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:27 am

If you get stressed about elite league posts on the girls forum stay away from the boys forum.

u12dad · Post by **u12dad** » Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:32 pm

There are six Elite teams and I believe this is how the rosters were create:

Red, White and Black are considered the upper/U19 level consisting mostly of exempt players who made National Camp as a 16 or 17 and players who tried out and were selected from the tryout in June. I believe that you were invited to the tryout if you made a final 54 team for Reebok HP 16/17. These are predominately 10th, 11 and 12 graders or birth years for HP's 98, 97 and previous 96 HP players. All three of these teams played in the U19 level for NIT. In Elite league, these teams did not play any U16 teams or any of the Royal, Sky and Grey teams.

Royal, Sky and Grey are considered U16 level and consisted of mostly kids who were part of a HP 54 roster or HP 15. The Royal and Sky teams were comprised of 9-12th graders. The Grey team was mostly HP 15 National Camp kids with birth year of 99 and are mostly in 9th or 10th grade.

After watching the NIT this weekend, I think these were their records:

National Level U19:
Black 4-0, champs of U19 level, beating SSM before a nice crowd of scouts.
Red 3-1, lost to SSM U19.
White 2-2, lost to Elite Black and Mission U-19.

American Level U16:
Grey 4-0, champs of U16 level, beating Revolution Black
Royal, 3-1, lost to Grey
Sky 3-1, lost to Mission U16

Overall, it shows the depth of talent of Minnesota girls, virtually teams thrown together with little practice, which was sparsely attended (19-5 in the NIT Tourney, 2 of the 5 losses were to another Elite team) and both levels of play won by an Elite team.

Nevertoomuchhockey · Post by **Nevertoomuchhockey** » Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:47 pm

THANK YOU.
Hope nu2 hockey reads this.
And one of their forum personas can answer why both Rev teams played 16u.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

2014 NIT SCORES

2014 NIT SCORES

Here is a score for ya:)

Missed a good game NTMH