Great 8
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:48 am
Does anyone know if rosters or schedule has been posted for the Ted Brill Great 8 coming up this weekend in St. Paul???
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
I would assume he is busy playing for Omaha.nosoupforyou wrote:3A/3AA couldn't fill a full roster so they had to add a player from Section 4A? Not questioning the player, he's a very nice player. Just surprised they couldn't get enough kids from all of those teams.
Also, no Bischoff on the Section 7 team???
Yep, quite a changed from Advanced 17 group last year. The prior two years Section 6 has won Advance 17 and Advance 16 with about 12 players off team advancing to Final 54.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
I wouldn't go to light on section 6, Schuldt, Thei both on the SW Elite team and nice players, Stumpf and Newman Little Falls play well although not against the competition of others. Section 5 has a full boat for sure, Section 1 hard for me to tell,don't know many of these players, might not be a good sign.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
While there are some strong Juniors in Section 6, it's the fact that some strong seniors chose not to participtate that hurts this teams depth. If you added Labosky, Moore, Vanelli, Besse, Cotta and Dingmann to Shuldt, Thie, Bergh, Knudsen, etc they would be considered a very strong team.Metrohockeyfan wrote:The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
Yup. 6 coulda been loadedOnFrozenPond wrote:While there are some strong Juniors in Section 6, it's the fact that some strong seniors chose not to participtate that hurts this teams depth. If you added Labosky, Moore, Vanelli, Besse, Cotta and Dingmann to Shuldt, Thie, Bergh, Knudsen, etc they would be considered a very strong team.Metrohockeyfan wrote:The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
Exactly.OnFrozenPond wrote:While there are some strong Juniors in Section 6, it's the fact that some strong seniors chose not to participtate that hurts this teams depth. If you added Labosky, Moore, Vanelli, Besse, Cotta and Dingmann to Shuldt, Thie, Bergh, Knudsen, etc they would be considered a very strong team.Metrohockeyfan wrote:The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
Hmm, no outstate kids on your list that you consider are either missing or already on the team. The best goalie in all of Section 6 is missing yes a 6A player Stumpf.OnFrozenPond wrote:While there are some strong Juniors in Section 6, it's the fact that some strong seniors chose not to participtate that hurts this teams depth. If you added Labosky, Moore, Vanelli, Besse, Cotta and Dingmann to Shuldt, Thie, Bergh, Knudsen, etc they would be considered a very strong team.Metrohockeyfan wrote:The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.Slap Shot wrote:6 looks weak.
Certainly didn't mean to imply that there were not other worthy players that passed up the opportunity. Just rattled off some names of good players that I am familiar with.preferhockey wrote:Hmm, no outstate kids on your list that you consider are either missing or already on the team. The best goalie in all of Section 6 is missing yes a 6A player Stumpf.OnFrozenPond wrote:While there are some strong Juniors in Section 6, it's the fact that some strong seniors chose not to participtate that hurts this teams depth. If you added Labosky, Moore, Vanelli, Besse, Cotta and Dingmann to Shuldt, Thie, Bergh, Knudsen, etc they would be considered a very strong team.Metrohockeyfan wrote: The thing that is going to hurt 6 is no juniors. They had a very deep team in 16 and 17's but now the skill, along with goaltending, is being spread out between the 18's and Great 8.
and what a surprise!! No one from State participant Duluth Marshall. Not sure if it is the standard complete lack of effort by Coach Flaherty to promote his kids or the usual shut out job by the coaches of the year..and skip the BS about them not having at least one deserving player...old goalie85 wrote:7 is loaded . [w/Duluth kids]
UnderstandOnFrozenPond wrote:
Certainly didn't mean to imply that there were not other worthy players that passed up the opportunity. Just rattled off some names of good players that I am familiar with.