GAMES TUESDAY 11-26-13

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Slammer
Posts: 606
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:49 am
Location: Burnsville, MN

Post by Slammer » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:23 pm

Major props to Randolph for finding a way to win against a very hot goalie. Good fight by Cambridge.

elliott70
Posts: 13620
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:29 pm

3-3 bemidji and Grand Rapids
I think it is going to OT, but radio announcer not very good .

Sog somthing like 30 15 for bemidji

elliott70
Posts: 13620
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:30 pm

4-3 grand rapids in ot over bemidji

Teak
Posts: 1847
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:27 am

Post by Teak » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:32 pm

Marshall 8-1 Worthington when I left with 4 1/2 minutes to go.

northfan
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by northfan » Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:35 pm

TRF 3 Roseau 0
Did not see game but my brother said it looks like
if TRF can keep the puck to the outside and allows
their goalie to see the puck it will be tough to get
it by him.

MNhockey29
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:06 am

Post by MNhockey29 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:59 pm

Forest lake 8- St. Francis 2

C-dad
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:47 pm

Post by C-dad » Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:12 am

east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee
Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? :shock: Should Centennial decline the penalty?

BSUBeaver
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Contact:

Post by BSUBeaver » Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:07 am

Alexandria 7, Little Falls 1. Shots on goal were 44-5 for Alexandria!

MNHockeyFan
Posts: 6953
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm

Post by MNHockeyFan » Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:31 am

C-dad wrote:Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? :shock: Should Centennial decline the penalty?
Or at the very least go into a "prevent defense" and try to keep it scoreless. ;)

east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 6962
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN
Contact:

Post by east hockey » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:36 am

C-dad wrote:
east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee
Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? :shock: Should Centennial decline the penalty?
Looking at the times of Edina's penalties and when they scored, only one of their goals was short-handed. Whoever put the "shorthanded" designation on the other four apparently got it wrong.

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/show/54 ... rer=889220

Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006

C-dad
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:47 pm

Post by C-dad » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:11 pm

east hockey wrote:
C-dad wrote:
east hockey wrote:Edina putting the hurt to Centennial 6-1 in the 3rd period.

Lee
Was it really 5 SHG for Edina in this one?? :shock: Should Centennial decline the penalty?
Looking at the times of Edina's penalties and when they scored, only one of their goals was short-handed. Whoever put the "shorthanded" designation on the other four apparently got it wrong.

http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/game/show/54 ... rer=889220

Lee
I heard back from an Edina dad that two goals were SHG. He could have gotten that wrong though.

ETA: Looks like Lee is right, only one was short and one may have been 4 on 4.

Roseau Fan
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:55 pm

Roseau V/S TRF

Post by Roseau Fan » Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:00 pm

It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.

elliott70
Posts: 13620
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Re: Roseau V/S TRF

Post by elliott70 » Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:19 pm

Roseau Fan wrote:It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.
That's too bad as they have some very talented seniors.
I suppose they are all looking for the UofM or UND scholarship?

northfan
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:26 pm

Post by northfan » Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:59 pm

Didn't this group win a PeeWee A and VFW state championship?

puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Re: Roseau V/S TRF

Post by puckbreath » Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:30 pm

Roseau Fan wrote:It's going to be a long season for Roseau unless the first line can learn to play team hockey instead of individual hockey. It's tough to play 3 on 5 hockey with your first line the whole game, meaning Roseau plays with 2 defensemen and 3 lone rangers. Most teams have figured out, when they play Roseau, they can put 2-3 players on any of the first line forwards when they have the puck because they know they're not going to pass.
Need more than one line to go anywhere anyway, plus, Roseau is weak in defense this year.

puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath » Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:32 pm

northfan wrote:Didn't this group win a PeeWee A and VFW state championship?
Yeah, but lots of things change in that many years, for most any team.

Only really relevant at the time.

Post Reply