TV Announcer annoyances

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

elliott70
Posts: 15428
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

east hockey wrote:Annoyance? Try having the network cut to Obama talking about the Ukraine. They're showing a split screen but the audio is on Obama. Grrrr. :evil:

Lee
You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
TTpuckster
Posts: 2726
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
Location: State of Hockey

Post by TTpuckster »

elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote:Annoyance? Try having the network cut to Obama talking about the Ukraine. They're showing a split screen but the audio is on Obama. Grrrr. :evil:

Lee
You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
Wow, don't hold back, Mark.
Say it how you really feel.
What is a Green Wave anyway?
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7270
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote:Annoyance? Try having the network cut to Obama talking about the Ukraine. They're showing a split screen but the audio is on Obama. Grrrr. :evil:

Lee
You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
Last time I'm voting for a man. Hey, is Hillary running? :P

Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
mnmouth
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:06 pm

Post by mnmouth »

elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote:Annoyance? Try having the network cut to Obama talking about the Ukraine. They're showing a split screen but the audio is on Obama. Grrrr. :evil:

Lee
You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
Not much of a choice. One dumb SOB or the other dumb SOB . . .
elliott70
Posts: 15428
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

east hockey wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote:Annoyance? Try having the network cut to Obama talking about the Ukraine. They're showing a split screen but the audio is on Obama. Grrrr. :evil:

Lee
You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
Last time I'm voting for a man. Hey, is Hillary running? :P

Lee
Did they not make a movie of Barack and Hillary???

Dumb and dumber....


:D
TTpuckster
Posts: 2726
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
Location: State of Hockey

Post by TTpuckster »

elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote:
elliott70 wrote: You voted for the dumb SOB....................


:D
Last time I'm voting for a man. Hey, is Hillary running? :P

Lee
Did they not make a movie of Barack and Hillary???

Dumb and dumber....


:D
Naw that was Bush and Cheney.
Although I could see how you might mix them up.
They all kinda look alike... :lol:
What is a Green Wave anyway?
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7270
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

Boy, did that get off-track quickly. :)

Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
TTpuckster
Posts: 2726
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
Location: State of Hockey

Post by TTpuckster »

east hockey wrote:Boy, did that get off-track quickly. :)

Lee
Gotta stay away from Politics,
Even when your just havin' fun :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
What is a Green Wave anyway?
elliott70
Posts: 15428
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

TTpuckster wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
east hockey wrote: Last time I'm voting for a man. Hey, is Hillary running? :P

Lee
Did they not make a movie of Barack and Hillary???

Dumb and dumber....


:D
Naw that was Bush and Cheney.
Although I could see how you might mix them up.
They all kinda look alike... :lol:
You are right about that...

Of course, we (the voters) are not that bright if we let these idiots run the country...

We need some middle income, hard working stiff that can keep things in perspective...

vote for Joe L. ....
ahh no, sorry that would not work....
I said middle income, hard working.
elliott70
Posts: 15428
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 »

east hockey wrote:Boy, did that get off-track quickly. :)

Lee
Dang admins leading us astray, again.


:D
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

Go to war to take out a Hussein and then vote a Hussein in a few years later... That's smarts!

Must have been the free cell phones...

But never cut in on the hockey tournament.
Winter is Coming
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:42 pm

Post by Winter is Coming »

At the risk of getting banned here for wandering off topic.... Is it just me or have them spent more time that usual talking about how you don't have to be rich to play hockey. They actually had a guy go out to a sporting goods place and price out 3 different levels of gear ranging from about 400 to abuot 1800 and talk about how even you poor folks can play. I did notice though that they did not mention goalie gear on that segment. I bet you don't get into that line of work for $400, probably not even $1800.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Winter is Coming wrote:At the risk of getting banned here for wandering off topic.... Is it just me or have them spent more time that usual talking about how you don't have to be rich to play hockey. They actually had a guy go out to a sporting goods place and price out 3 different levels of gear ranging from about 400 to abuot 1800 and talk about how even you poor folks can play. I did notice though that they did not mention goalie gear on that segment. I bet you don't get into that line of work for $400, probably not even $1800.
Pretty out of touch, if they think "poor" people got $400 to throw at hockey.

By that definition, a LOT of folks are "poor".
PuckRanger
Posts: 1829
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Iron Range
Contact:

Post by PuckRanger »

puckbreath wrote:
Winter is Coming wrote:At the risk of getting banned here for wandering off topic.... Is it just me or have them spent more time that usual talking about how you don't have to be rich to play hockey. They actually had a guy go out to a sporting goods place and price out 3 different levels of gear ranging from about 400 to abuot 1800 and talk about how even you poor folks can play. I did notice though that they did not mention goalie gear on that segment. I bet you don't get into that line of work for $400, probably not even $1800.
Pretty out of touch, if they think "poor" people got $400 to throw at hockey.

By that definition, a LOT of folks are "poor".
No mention of association fees, either. That's usually the one that prices out the younger kids. Its not hard to find gear on the cheap if you look hard enough or don't mind wearing used stuff. The ice time, tourney fees, and travel expenses are where the major expenses come from at the youth level, which is the audiences they appear to be targeting with these blurbs.

Back on topic... I like Thorne as the voice, but I agree that he has been very generic. Hardly ever differentiated between which Poehling was which in the Lakeville North game... same with the Sullivan's from Eden Prairie. Barely ever hear a name from 2nd & 3rd line players.
Cadets16
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:39 pm

Post by Cadets16 »

PuckRanger wrote:
puckbreath wrote:
Winter is Coming wrote:At the risk of getting banned here for wandering off topic.... Is it just me or have them spent more time that usual talking about how you don't have to be rich to play hockey. They actually had a guy go out to a sporting goods place and price out 3 different levels of gear ranging from about 400 to abuot 1800 and talk about how even you poor folks can play. I did notice though that they did not mention goalie gear on that segment. I bet you don't get into that line of work for $400, probably not even $1800.
Pretty out of touch, if they think "poor" people got $400 to throw at hockey.

By that definition, a LOT of folks are "poor".
No mention of association fees, either. That's usually the one that prices out the younger kids. Its not hard to find gear on the cheap if you look hard enough or don't mind wearing used stuff. The ice time, tourney fees, and travel expenses are where the major expenses come from at the youth level, which is the audiences they appear to be targeting with these blurbs.
The only thing that ever held me back from playing hockey.

Nothing a good set of rollerblades, an old wood stick, a street puck, and a cardboard box goal can't fix though. :mrgreen: :lol:
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Cadets16 wrote:
PuckRanger wrote:
puckbreath wrote: Pretty out of touch, if they think "poor" people got $400 to throw at hockey.

By that definition, a LOT of folks are "poor".
No mention of association fees, either. That's usually the one that prices out the younger kids. Its not hard to find gear on the cheap if you look hard enough or don't mind wearing used stuff. The ice time, tourney fees, and travel expenses are where the major expenses come from at the youth level, which is the audiences they appear to be targeting with these blurbs.
The only thing that ever held me back from playing hockey.

Nothing a good set of rollerblades, an old wood stick, a street puck, and a cardboard box goal can't fix though. :mrgreen: :lol:
You attended sta, but couldn't afford to play hockey ?
Cadets16
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:39 pm

Post by Cadets16 »

*currently attend

STA has one of the best financial aid programs of all the privates.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Cadets16 wrote:*currently attend

STA has one of the best financial aid programs of all the privates.
Sorry to hear that :P

How does it rank cost-wise compared to the others ?
Cadets16
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:39 pm

Post by Cadets16 »

puckbreath wrote:
Cadets16 wrote:*currently attend

STA has one of the best financial aid programs of all the privates.
How does it rank cost-wise with the others ?
It's up there, though I don't know the exact statistics. If you count Shattuck, I'm positive they are the most expensive, followed by Blake and Breck. Ironically, Blake and Breck also have very good financial assistance.

I feel like a Catholic school of the Archdiocese would hesitate to turn somebody down due to cost if they really do want to further their Catholic education.
Roy01
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:29 pm

Post by Roy01 »

Cadets16 wrote:
puckbreath wrote:
Cadets16 wrote:*currently attend

STA has one of the best financial aid programs of all the privates.
How does it rank cost-wise with the others ?
It's up there, though I don't know the exact statistics. If you count Shattuck, I'm positive they are the most expensive, followed by Blake and Breck. Ironically, Blake and Breck also have very good financial assistance.

I feel like a Catholic school of the Archdiocese would hesitate to turn somebody down due to cost if they really do want to further their Catholic education.
Is that what you guys call it there? Catholic Education? :lol: Jokes aside though, the school's grants are around $9,400 per student. They help to get students in the door.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Cadets16 wrote:
puckbreath wrote:
Cadets16 wrote:*currently attend

STA has one of the best financial aid programs of all the privates.
How does it rank cost-wise with the others ?
It's up there, though I don't know the exact statistics. If you count Shattuck, I'm positive they are the most expensive, followed by Blake and Breck. Ironically, Blake and Breck also have very good financial assistance.

I feel like a Catholic school of the Archdiocese would hesitate to turn somebody down due to cost if they really do want to further their Catholic education.
Yeah, most times, the most expensive schools, offer the most aid, but the resulting cost is still higher than others.
Cadets16
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:39 pm

Post by Cadets16 »

puckbreath wrote:Yeah, most times, the most expensive schools, offer the most aid, but the resulting cost is still higher than others.
Yeah, on the average that may be a good statement. There's always those students though that get far more aid or far less depending on their true needs.
puckbreath
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:08 pm

Post by puckbreath »

Cadets16 wrote:
puckbreath wrote:Yeah, most times, the most expensive schools, offer the most aid, but the resulting cost is still higher than others.
Yeah, on the average that may be a good statement. There's always those students though that get far more aid or far less depending on their true needs.
That's true.
WB6162
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:57 pm

Re: TV Announcer annoyances

Post by WB6162 »

NLHockey wrote:Gonna have to go see some games in person. Announcers mispronunciations driving me crazy. It's not CH-sago lakes it's SHHisago Lakes. Sounds like SHI$ NOT CHIT. Somebody must have said something to them after the 1st ...they finally started to pronounce it correctly. Now they need to get some of the kids' last names right.
So it bothers you that much?
NLHockey
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:14 pm

Re: TV Announcer annoyances

Post by NLHockey »

WB6162 wrote:
NLHockey wrote:Gonna have to go see some games in person. Announcers mispronunciations driving me crazy. It's not CH-sago lakes it's SHHisago Lakes. Sounds like SHI$ NOT CHIT. Somebody must have said something to them after the 1st ...they finally started to pronounce it correctly. Now they need to get some of the kids' last names right.
So it bothers you that much?
Probably as much as girls hockey bothers you

And yes, if you put yourself out there as a professional, you should sound like one......that is their job after all. But hey, it's just single A right :roll:
Post Reply