Bemidji bs Moorhead Section 8 Final

The Latest 400 or so Topics

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

jdh
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:10 am

Bemidji bs Moorhead Section 8 Final

Post by jdh » Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:51 pm

Who is going to come out victorious?

grindiangrad-80
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by grindiangrad-80 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:55 pm

I think Bemidji returns to the X.

PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3010
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:00 pm

moorhead 3-2 OT

GoldenBear69
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 2:30 am

Post by GoldenBear69 » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:08 pm

I think Bemidji returns to the X:

BEM-4
MHD-2

FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.

SPUDNUT
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Moorhead

Post by SPUDNUT » Tue Feb 23, 2016 6:18 pm

GoldenBear69 wrote:I think Bemidji returns to the X:

BEM-4
MHD-2

FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.


Bet the Sheep will be reloading, too !

Syd Barrett
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:37 pm

Post by Syd Barrett » Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:09 am

GoldenBear69 wrote: FYI - After this year, the section is MHD's for several years to come.
Not so fast GB, the Wizard of Aus has a heluva group of Bantams coming as long as he doesn't get the curtain ripped open exposing all of his Bells & Whistles and Smoke & Mirrors [-X

WestMetro
Posts: 2463
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:08 pm

Post by WestMetro » Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:23 pm

Which internet audio on this one?

mulefarm
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:01 pm

Post by mulefarm » Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:56 pm

Updates

warriors41
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Post by warriors41 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:00 pm

mulefarm wrote:Updates
1-1 after two. Moorhead scored first and then Bemidji tied it up a few minutes later right after they got a power play.

grindiangrad-80
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by grindiangrad-80 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:00 pm

WestMetro wrote:Which internet audio on this one?
http://www.meridix.com/mbp/hockey/index ... ype=hockey

TheMNhockey1
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:18 pm

Post by TheMNhockey1 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:01 pm

1-1 end of 2 via bemidji hockey twitter

TheMNhockey1
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:18 pm

Post by TheMNhockey1 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:31 pm

3-2 Bemidji 7 mins left
3-3

warriors41
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Post by warriors41 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:43 pm

Heading to overtime. The Jacks will start the OT period with about 30 seconds of power play left over.

warriors41
Posts: 645
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:40 pm

Post by warriors41 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:51 pm

And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.

grindiangrad-80
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by grindiangrad-80 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:55 pm

Hoping the game at Amsoil tomorrow night is just like that.

SPUDNUT
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Moorhead

Post by SPUDNUT » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:03 pm

Will pull for the Jacks at the X - hope they make a better showing than last yr.

north_bear
Posts: 491
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:25 pm
Location: G.R.

Post by north_bear » Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:43 pm

grindiangrad-80 wrote:Hoping the game at Amsoil tomorrow night is just like that.
As a hockey fan, yes. As a GR fan, I hope it's a comfortable lead late in the game. Not sure if my nerves are up for one of those.
Thunderhawk Fanatic!!

RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:15 pm

warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.

elliott70
Posts: 13097
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 » Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:59 am

RRubberbeeskit wrote:
warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.
A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.

Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.

Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.

An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.

One side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.

grindiangrad-80
Posts: 2325
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by grindiangrad-80 » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:41 am

elliott70 wrote:
RRubberbeeskit wrote:
warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.
A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.

Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.

Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.

An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.

One side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.
It was fun listening to that one. The announcers were fired up. Good stuff.

RRubberbeeskit
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:23 am

Post by RRubberbeeskit » Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:46 am

elliott70 wrote:
RRubberbeeskit wrote:
warriors41 wrote:And the winner is..........the Bemidji Lumberjacks! 4-3 OT.
Would someone please provide a recap of the winning play in OT as its sounds to me like 2 Jacks players got deep in the attacking end after a stretch pass uncontested. Sounds like a major defensive letdown on he play. Thanks.
A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.

Good hustle by two Jacks and the game was over.

Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.

An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.

side was going to be disappointed. But both sides can be proud.

Elliott70.. Thanks a ton for the recap I appreciate the details as I didn't quite catch that on the radio as to what happened. It sounded like it was a tremendous game back-and-forth good defensive plays some great scoring opportunities and great saves. A little sidenote . I've been following Moorehead a little more closely as Randkleve came up through the Otters hockey Association and left about two years ago... A little recruiting, sure could have used him on our roster to help our numbers.

Syd Barrett
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:37 pm

Post by Syd Barrett » Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:16 am

elliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.

Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.

An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
Elliott, we figured you may had had to change your depends after that game :-s

Kranky Jr. was at the game giving the Shady Bunch updates, sounds like a heluva game, you must of got a little puckered up when the Jacks were 2 men short for 2 minutes late in the game [-o<

He said Moorhead wasn't too happy with the winning goal, thought it was a missed icing call :-k

Either way I hope Bemidji makes some noise at the X =D>
Congrats Jacks \:D/

elliott70
Posts: 13097
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 » Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:27 am

Syd Barrett wrote:
elliott70 wrote:A bad line change by Moorhead. It looked like one Moorhead player thought it was icing and stopped.

Moorhead played well. Jacks played well. It was warm, ice a little slow. Pucks a bit bouncy. Reffing was okay.

An exciting hockey game with lots of fans, good student sections, both bands.
Just a good high school hockey game.
Elliott, we figured you may had had to change your depends after that game :-s

Kranky Jr. was at the game giving the Shady Bunch updates, sounds like a heluva game, you must of got a little puckered up when the Jacks were 2 men short for 2 minutes late in the game [-o<

He said Moorhead wasn't too happy with the winning goal, thought it was a missed icing call :-k

Either way I hope Bemidji makes some noise at the X =D>
Congrats Jacks \:D/
Not even close to icing.
Jon Boy Ammerman screwed up on the line change. Puck is at our blue line and he is pulling kids off the ice.

Calling the two penalties was a bit iffy. Especially since nothing got called after that. But Warroad/Baudette did a decent job overall. The whistles disappeared at about the 2 minute warning.

The Next One
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:17 pm

Post by The Next One » Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:37 am

Elliot,
Can u explain why no icing? Even the one announcer sounded like he was expecting a whistle.
I have heard from people at the game with no dog in the fight. Good hockey people that know the game. There thoughts were 100% icing, both bemidji penalties were legit, and MHD penalty with 90 seconds left was brutal.

elliott70
Posts: 13097
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Bemidji

Post by elliott70 » Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:58 am

The Next One wrote:Elliot,
Can u explain why no icing? Even the one announcer sounded like he was expecting a whistle.
I have heard from people at the game with no dog in the fight. Good hockey people that know the game. There thoughts were 100% icing, both bemidji penalties were legit, and MHD penalty with 90 seconds left was brutal.
I was at the end and saw the flight of the puck; it was obviously touched. No one from our vantage point even thought icing. We did think, why are they changing?

It was definitely a penalty but based on what was not being called at that point in time I was surprised by it. But everyone watching has a bias. No question that the penalties called on Bemidji were penalties, but again, based on what/how they were calling things we (the group around me) were surprised they called the second one.

As a Moorhead fan I would not expect anything less from you or other fans. But I am being completely honest, it was obviously touched. I have been in the media box and can understand that they may not have seen it. The Bemidji announcers stated it was obviously touched.

As a long time coach as I tell players, you control what you do.

Anyway it was an excellent game despite the bouncing puck.

Post Reply