Page 4 of 5

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 8:05 am
by bardown27
Corn Cobb wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:02 am 3A Scores - 1/28/20

Orono 11 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 1
Luverne 3 Worthington 1
Marshall 7 Willmar 2
New Ulm 16 Fairmont 2
Waseca 7 Redwood Valley 0
New Ulm, CLASSLESS

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:47 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 1/30/20

New Ulm 4 Luverne 1
Hutchinson 8 Redwood Valley 1
Windom 6 Worthington 2

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 9:30 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 1/31/20

Dodge County 6 Windom 1
Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 5 Bloomington Kennedy 4
Delano 3 Hutchinson 1
Fairmont 6 Redwood Valley 4

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:08 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/1/20

Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 7 Luverne 0
Minnesota River 2 Marshall 1
Morris/Benson 7 Worthington 1

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:10 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/3/20

Luverne 4 Windom 3
River Lakes 5 Willmar 0

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 5:06 am
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/4/20

Luverne 2 Fairmont 1
Monticello 4 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 1
Hutchinson 4 River Lakes 2

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2020 12:31 pm
by Stang5280
Corn Cobb wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 5:06 am 3A Scores - 2/4/20

Luverne 2 Fairmont 1
Monticello 4 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 1
Hutchinson 4 River Lakes 2
Nice win for Hutch, as River Lakes can be a tough matchup even for teams who see them regularly.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:26 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/6/20

New Ulm 3 Albert Lea 1
Waseca 4 Fairmont 1
Redwood Valley 5 Worthington 4 OT

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 11:57 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/7/20

Delano 6 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 0
Windom 13 LaCrescent 3
Marshall 5 Luverne 2
Orono 5 Hutchinson 2
Waconia 8 Redwood Valley 1
Sartell-St. Stephen 7 Willmar 0

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2020 9:33 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/8/20

Windom 3 Waseca 2
Fairmont 5 LaCrescent 2
Willmar 3 Redwood Valley 2

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:27 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/10/20

Hutchinson 5 Litchfield/Dassel-Cokato 3
Prairie Centre 4 Willmar 1

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:08 am
by Tigers95
So Sect. 3A season is pretty much over and they seed tomorrow. So how do all you prognosticators see things shaking out?

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:38 am
by bardown27
Tigers95 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:08 am So Sect. 3A season is pretty much over and they seed tomorrow. So how do all you prognosticators see things shaking out?
1. Hutch
2. Litch
3. New Ulm
4. Marshall
5. Luverne
6. Windom
7. Willmar
8. Worthington
9. Redwood
10. Fairmont

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:44 pm
by Corn Cobb
bardown27 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:38 am
Tigers95 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:08 am So Sect. 3A season is pretty much over and they seed tomorrow. So how do all you prognosticators see things shaking out?
1. Hutch
2. Litch
3. New Ulm
4. Marshall
5. Luverne
6. Windom
7. Willmar
8. Worthington
9. Redwood
10. Fairmont
Mostly agree. You could make an argument to switch LDC & New Ulm at 2/3 and Redwood/Fairmont at 9/10.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:47 pm
by bardown27
Corn Cobb wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:44 pm
bardown27 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:38 am
Tigers95 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:08 am So Sect. 3A season is pretty much over and they seed tomorrow. So how do all you prognosticators see things shaking out?
1. Hutch
2. Litch
3. New Ulm
4. Marshall
5. Luverne
6. Windom
7. Willmar
8. Worthington
9. Redwood
10. Fairmont
Mostly agree. You could make an argument to switch LDC & New Ulm at 2/3 and Redwood/Fairmont at 9/10.
What's the argument for switching LDC and New Ulm? LDC has 2 section losses, both to Hutch, and has beat New Ulm. So how could New Ulm jump Litch? I agree, could make argument for Fairmont over RWV since Fairmont has more recent win.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:06 pm
by Corn Cobb
bardown27 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:47 pm
Corn Cobb wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:44 pm
bardown27 wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:38 am

1. Hutch
2. Litch
3. New Ulm
4. Marshall
5. Luverne
6. Windom
7. Willmar
8. Worthington
9. Redwood
10. Fairmont
Mostly agree. You could make an argument to switch LDC & New Ulm at 2/3 and Redwood/Fairmont at 9/10.
What's the argument for switching LDC and New Ulm? LDC has 2 section losses, both to Hutch, and has beat New Ulm. So how could New Ulm jump Litch? I agree, could make argument for Fairmont over RWV since Fairmont has more recent win.
I don't think it will happen (LDC/NU switch). The only rationale would be margin of losses between the two teams against Mound and Hutch. The head to head result does favor LDC. Not sure how LDC's record resonates amongst the coaches voting, even though they have a significantly more difficult schedule.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:17 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/11/20

Hutchinson 4 Waconia 2
Prairie Centre 5 Redwood Valley 4
New Ulm 5 Windom 4
Worthington 6 Willmar 0

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:18 pm
by Corn Cobb
My projected 3A seedings:

1 -Hutchinson
2 - LDC
3 - New Ulm
4 - Marshall
5 - Luverne
6 - Windom
7 - Worthington
8 - Willmar
9 - Fairmont
10 - Redwood Valley

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:25 pm
by bardown27
Final 3A seedings:

1. Hutch
2. LDC
3. New Ulm
4. Marshall
5. Luverne
6. Windom
7. Worthington
8. Fairmont
9. Willmar
10. Redwood

Tuesday 2/18:
Fairmont vs. Willmar
Worthington vs. Redwood

Thursday 2/20:
Fairmont/Willmar winner @ Hutch
Luverne @ Marshall
Worthington/Redwood winner @ LDC
Windom @ New Ulm

All 7 o'clock puck drops

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 9:47 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Score - 2/13/20

New Ulm 4 Waseca 0

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:50 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Scores - 2/14/20

Minnesota River 9 Luverne 6
Dodge County 5 Worthington 1

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:32 pm
by goldy313
I watched the DC/Worthington game tonight. The Lamb kid is really really good. DC is decent but without Lamb the outcome is up in the air.

FWIW, it is nice to see Worthington get a top 8 seed, it is a town that with just a little success I could see hockey growing quickly. They’ll have have to get non traditional hockey families involved, but I think with just a little success they can.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:30 am
by Teak
goldy313 wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:32 pmFWIW, it is nice to see Worthington get a top 8 seed, it is a town that with just a little success I could see hockey growing quickly. They’ll have have to get non traditional hockey families involved, but I think with just a little success they can.
Yes, Worthington has improved the past two seasons. With those "non-traditional hockey families", they put out one of the better soccer teams every year.

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:46 pm
by Corn Cobb
3A Score - 2/15/20

Waseca 2 Marshall 1

Re: The Argy Bargy 3A Thread 2019-2020

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:40 am
by Mitedad33
Teak wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:30 am
goldy313 wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:32 pmFWIW, it is nice to see Worthington get a top 8 seed, it is a town that with just a little success I could see hockey growing quickly. They’ll have have to get non traditional hockey families involved, but I think with just a little success they can.
Yes, Worthington has improved the past two seasons. With those "non-traditional hockey families", they put out one of the better soccer teams every year.
Is it Worthington getting better? Maybe some of the teams are going in the wrong direction? Most of the teams in D4 don’t carry A teams at the youth level and if they do they are very weak. New Ulm’s Bantam B’s beat Worthington’s top team.