I see your point and don't disagree wholly with your argument. I too am in favor of choice and also feel in some ways that our system does not provide options for many. Particularly those in associations that are managed to please the masses of mediocre talent at the expense of those with the drive and spirit to compete at a higher level.Blackhawkfan wrote:I think everyone understands that there is a cost. There is a cost for everything in life. MY WHOLE POINT IS THAT IF MINNESOTA WAS SPLIT INTO PROGRESSIVE AND REGRESSIVE, THOSE THAT WANT TO PLAY PROGRESSIVE WILL HAVE TO PAY MORE THAN THE REGRESSIVES. BUT WITH THAT, THE REGRESSIVES SHOULD KEEP THEIR COMMENTS TO THEMSELVES AND LET AAA HOCKEY SUCCEED OR FAIL BASED ON A COST/BENEFIT RATIO . QUIT TRYING TO DEMEAN THOSE THAT WISH TO SEE A HIGHER LEVEL OF HOCKEY AND COMPETE ON THE LARGER STAGE. THOSE THAT BAD MOUTH AAA FEAR THAT THEIR ASSOCIATION MODEL WILL DRY UP AND GO AWAY. IF THAT BE THE CASE, THEN SO BE IT.....THE PEOPLE THEN HAVE MADE THEIR CHOICE. IF THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS THE "BE ALL, END ALL" THEN IT SHOULD BE ABLE TO STAND THE CHALLENGE OF AAA HOCKEY WITH IT'S BETTER DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT WON'T, THAT IS WHY THEY WISH TO BUILD AN "IRON CURTAIN" AROUND THE STATE. JUST LIKE THE SOVIETS!!!CHI-TOWN HOCKEYDAD wrote:Being from Chicago now living in MN, I can say from direct knowledge that what BHF has failed to mention is that Tier I elite hockey there is only for those wishing to spend upwards of $10k per annum to play. The Tier II clubs available at costs comparable (on the high end) to what we pay here, lack experienced trainers and offer a lower level of competition. Two weeks ago I was at a Suburban Chicago rink watching their club's group of top 10 year olds scrimmage. They level of play was akin to a good C or avg B2 team in the TC metro. I just returned from the squirt tournament in Fargo,Outoftowner wrote:I like the idea of a AAA winter league. I feel we should be free to play wherever we want and find the best hockey that is appropriate for our child's interest and skill level.
It really sucks to be in an association that sucks and has no real desire to not suck. I shouldn't need to sell my house and move just to find better hockey for my kids.
no Chicago Metro clubs attended.
However, many I speak to in Chicago wish they had the Cost/Benefit situation we have as compared to the one they experience.
But I believe what you are suggesting is that MN could be in a position to offer a hybrid with options to appease all. I do believe that a Tier I structure could be achieved at a lower cost in MN based upon the ice economic factors as well as reduced travel requirements to find competition.