District 2 AA teams.
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
District 2 AA teams.
D-2 has no AA teams. WBL/Stillwater to play D8. FL/D10. I thought NSP/Revolution was going to play D2.[are they A?]
Last edited by old goalie85 on Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 1:20 pm
The BE website indicates that the Revolution will play PWAA in D2 as part of the NSP Association. From what I hear nothing has been mentioned at D2 meetings about a PWAA team from NSP. With 3 only known PWAA teams in D2, Stillwater and WBL are playing in D8 and FL in D10. That leaves the question, if NSP/Revolution is playing PWAA, where are they playing? Will the team only have BE students or will they allow NSP members to tryout for their PWAA team?
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 1:20 pm
http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... -17-14.pdf
Quote from the D2 August meeting minutes linked above:
DIRECTOR – Jake R Had a redistricting meeting. Lots of discussion but nothing was decided. Coaches who do not do Safesport by December 31st will be redlined. Managers and Association Board Members also need to do it. AA- Forest Lake will play in D10, WBL & Stillwater will play in District 8. Roseville has not responded yet.
Quote from the D2 August meeting minutes linked above:
DIRECTOR – Jake R Had a redistricting meeting. Lots of discussion but nothing was decided. Coaches who do not do Safesport by December 31st will be redlined. Managers and Association Board Members also need to do it. AA- Forest Lake will play in D10, WBL & Stillwater will play in District 8. Roseville has not responded yet.
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Interesting ... wouldn't D2 rep need to get a nod from D8 and D10 to make this a fact? Not seeing anything out from D8 or D10. It would involve scheduling and home/away for the host districts, and would not think teams from south of Farmington are anxious to play an away game in Stillwater in later Jan. Host districts would enjoy the competitions from the D2 teams, but both D10 and D8 are not lack of AA teams.old goalie85 wrote:From our D2 rep. It's a fact.
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
I attended the last few d8 meetings. August meeting Rak indicated that WBL AA and Stillwater AA teams were 100% playing in D8 league and would be attending d8 schedule meetings. D8 A teams will not play D8 AA teams this year in league. There will be a seperate D8 A league unless not enough teams for a viable league in which case D8 A teams would play in D2 A league.
Owatonna is also requesting to play in D8 AA leagues...this will be voted on at Sept meeting.
Owatonna is also requesting to play in D8 AA leagues...this will be voted on at Sept meeting.
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:28 pm
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
At the Bantam level ... from what I heard from a D6 rep and a D6 varsity coach.scoreandscoreoften wrote:I believe Wayzata and OMG AA's are going to play a district 6 schedule this year too. Another mega district?old goalie85 wrote:Bo-is this the start of the "mega" districts you warned about two years ago ???
Of course it's all hear say until I get the iCal update.
Sorry, fresh out, Don't Really Give Any.
-
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 pm
It is still interesting to see some associations choose to play A but have the strength of playing in AA; while others play AA but really should play A level. It seems to be a lot of hit-and-miss's when season starts.iceman468 wrote:http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... .28.14.pdf
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
I said give it a few years and it will morph back in to exactly what A/B-1 was.... Naturally it would. And now we get to have districts that are imploding.Mnhockeys wrote:It is still interesting to see some associations choose to play A but have the strength of playing in AA; while others play AA but really should play A level. It seems to be a lot of hit-and-miss's when season starts.iceman468 wrote:http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... .28.14.pdf
The A level is the new B-1
I don't see how everyone could not see this coming.MrBoDangles wrote:I said give it a few years and it will morph back in to exactly what A/B-1 was.... Naturally it would. And now we get to have districts that are imploding.Mnhockeys wrote:It is still interesting to see some associations choose to play A but have the strength of playing in AA; while others play AA but really should play A level. It seems to be a lot of hit-and-miss's when season starts.iceman468 wrote:http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... .28.14.pdf
The A level is the new B-1
I am honestly curious as to what the people on the side of creating this new (call it what it is) naming system thought this would do?
What on earth was it going to change? Seriously, what could the outcome had been otherwise? Please someone tell me what the "powers-that-be" were directing this towards.
Sorry, fresh out, Don't Really Give Any.