District 4: 2006-2007

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:19 pm

Well, let's hear who will be the favorites in PeeWee and Bantam A and B! Discuss.

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:29 pm

I just want to point out that Mankato PWA is going to take a fall from #2 in Reg. Season and #1 in playoffs. The Bantam A's will have a good shot at going to state, and possibly FINALLY winning a game for the Silver Region. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... eykid14</A> at: 3/6/06 8:32 pm

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:37 pm

well just because of the peewees last year mankato and faribault will be contenders. just because of they were both in the regional championship game. i think it depends on who moves up to high school or not. dan billiar and ryan willaert who were the anchors of the team last year in peewees could move up with eat losing 14 kids and them being the only kids going to east fomr katos bantam team except for one other who was a second year (nick baker). faribault i would guess would be similar. albert lea will be not bad i know there is a pretty good second year peewee moving up and they have an awesome coach. joshdog likes to rip on me when he sees me<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> . As for the peewees i dont know a whole lot about squirt teams around here but the faribault new prague and kato teams are always good. faribualt looks to be good for that age in the future. <hr />I am the souperstar.

tigers0404 · Post by **tigers0404** » Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:10 pm

i think that mankato and faribault will be on the top of the region

tigers0404 · Post by **tigers0404** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:48 pm

Any imput on Albert Lea's Bantams?

hockey school · Post by **hockey school** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:05 pm

Faribault will have the sweep for both peewee A and bantam A. Faribault will have some very good second year peewees next year and some very good first year bantams. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat">

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:06 pm

Bantam A goes to Mankato, New Prague, and Faribault. Just as this year's peewee a's, and last years.

hendy1621 · Post by **hendy1621** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:31 pm

I agree with hockey school. Faribault is the powerhouse in D4.

sik0414 · Post by **sik0414** » Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:22 pm

Now no disrespect to fairbault but watching them play they just look like they didnt have the depth of quality "A" players to compete the entire game or at least at the bantam level this year so im gonna go with the Bantam Mankato and Pee Wee New Prague or Mankato sik

dasherdude · Post by **dasherdude** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:16 am

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Any imput on Albert Lea's Bantams? <hr></blockquote> Good question. Only 4 or 5 players will be returning from this year's team, including the goalie. No idea what the B Bantams were like this past year, but a lot of those players should/could be moving up to A. I would expect a similar team to this year with only about 5 or so first year players. But they will have JOSHDOG, and that's good for a few extra W's! Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... herdude</A> at: 3/9/06 11:17 am

hockey school · Post by **hockey school** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:17 pm

Sik. Did u not know that Faribault's peewee A team was half first year players. The peewee team in 06- 07 will be a powerhouse in district four. The squirt A for faribault just won the playoffs, and New Prague, AND Mankato both were second year teams for peewee A. Think on that one... <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat">

hockeykid14 · Post by **hockeykid14** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:22 pm

He means Bantam A next year I think.

sik0414 · Post by **sik0414** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:24 pm

ya sry for the confusion i was mainly talking bantam A sik

Boston9900 · Post by **Boston9900** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:00 pm

no there where only like 5 or 6 guys on the team that were first years sry

ALdude9 · Post by **ALdude9** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:52 pm

Dasher, AL will not compare to this years team. They will lose most of all their players and they lose all their defensemen besides one that is not the skilled. hes not bad but needs speed. yes they have Jdog but its the players game. next year they will have Brackey who will need to put the puck in the net. The first years and the B bantams moving up have some HUGE spots to fill. i wish good luck to them and Jdog.

tigers0404 · Post by **tigers0404** » Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:21 pm

My bet is AL is gonna need all the help they can get with the district having a few power houses

dasherdude · Post by **dasherdude** » Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:03 am

ALdude9, You mean to tell me AL's Bantams for next season won't be as good as this year's team which finished 4th in league play, 4th at the District Tourney and 6th at the Regional Tourney? That would be a huge hole to fill...<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> Of course there will be holes to fill, but the players filling those holes will be second year players. That will help AL finish in about the same place in District play as this year's team. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... herdude</A> at: 3/10/06 9:06 am

ALdude9 · Post by **ALdude9** » Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:48 pm

Alright whatever you say. i could garrenttee that the bantams next year will barley win 15 games while us bantams this year won 27. and the last bantam team and the only other bantam team ever to win 25 or more games was with Jonny Breuer.

upucker · Post by **upucker** » Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:06 pm

Dude: This is in no disrespect to your bantam team. But you should do some research before you make a statement like that. You sound like a youngster so I will just tell you that Albert lea Bantams have been around for at least 35 years. I will give you a great A.L. team without too much research. 1974 Bantam team 31-7 took 2nd in regions losing 7-4 to Rochester, same Roch. team won State high school Championship in 1977. That Albert Lea team went to the VFW State tournament in International falls that year and were very competitive. When teams play 50 games a year it is really not to difficult to post 25 wins, thats only 1/2 your games. Well good luck next year and you did have a nice club this year. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p100.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... upucker</A> at: 3/12/06 6:34 pm

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:38 pm

was the albert lea goalie for bantam A a first or second year? <hr />I am thesouperstar.

ALdude9 · Post by **ALdude9** » Sun Mar 12, 2006 7:26 pm

Soup He's a first year.

soup3 · Post by **soup3** » Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:03 pm

ok just wondering....for mankato to be successful for Bantam A next year it depends on if anybody moves up to HS and how their goalies are. I know last years peewee goalies were a little shaky at times. <hr />I am thesouperstar.

falkster09 · Post by **falkster09** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:59 am

I can tell you one thing, next year joshdog will have his hands full. If you look at the A-peewee team from two years ago, it wasnt good. I dont think that even won 10 games. Im sure Joshdog is up to the challenge and will right the ship. Falkster

tigers0404 · Post by **tigers0404** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:24 pm

My hope is that AL can pull out a decent season

icantstopthepuck · Post by **icantstopthepuck** » Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:44 pm

Hockeykid, Do you really think that just because Kato went to state two years ago that they will go again? The bantam game is a lot different than the PW game. The players are bigger, stronger, and faster making the opponents think a lot faster. Kato should have good team speed next year as they did this year but they will lack in the size and/or strength department. But hey if they all work hard in the off-season they could very well make another state run. I would love to see it!

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

District 4: 2006-2007

District 4: 2006-2007

Re: District 4: 2006-2007

Re: District 4: 2006-2007

Re: 2006-2007

2006-2007

06- 07

Re: 06- 07

Re: 06- 07

Re: 06- 07

Re: 2006-2007

2006- 2007

Hockey School

Re: Hockey School

hockey school

next year

Re: next year

next year

Re: next year

research

Re: research

Re: research

Re: research

Re: research

2006-2007

Re: District 4: 2006-2007