Every time I watched Woodbury last year I was impressed with the play of Walker Hyland. I think he stood out as a sophomore on the blueline.wbmd wrote:David Eddy was far from being the only reason Woodbury was good last season or even the previous season.Goose19 wrote:CDH will be a very good team. Zimmerman, ALt and Bangs are all very good and all are in Elite. They have seven forwards back so three good lines and four d and alt is amazing and a returning goalie but he's unproven. Woodbury's two guys can't beat them. They have like four returners. they will be trash. Eddy was the only reason they were good. CDH vs Eastview section 3AA Final
Good goaltending, guys stepping up when not expected to -- such as Mike Nelson in the 3AA finals -- and the coaching of Wes Bolin.
SEC Next Season
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
- Location: East Metro
If I'm not mistaken, Walker Hyland was also named to the honorable mention all-conference team last year.SEC Scotty wrote:Every time I watched Woodbury last year I was impressed with the play of Walker Hyland. I think he stood out as a sophomore on the blueline.wbmd wrote:David Eddy was far from being the only reason Woodbury was good last season or even the previous season.Goose19 wrote:CDH will be a very good team. Zimmerman, ALt and Bangs are all very good and all are in Elite. They have seven forwards back so three good lines and four d and alt is amazing and a returning goalie but he's unproven. Woodbury's two guys can't beat them. They have like four returners. they will be trash. Eddy was the only reason they were good. CDH vs Eastview section 3AA Final
Good goaltending, guys stepping up when not expected to -- such as Mike Nelson in the 3AA finals -- and the coaching of Wes Bolin.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:28 pm
sophomores that i know that are goodiamlegend99 wrote:who is going to be the best returning players from this conference?
and who is going to be the best sophomores or people playing first year varsity?
Cretin-Derham Hall-barbato? kinda big, all around alright player
Forest Lake-none
Hastings-nelson, little small but really good
Mounds View-none
Park-most left to private schools
Roseville-becker made the adv. 15 team.
Stillwater-dochniak, never seen him but heard he was good
White Bear Lake-birkinbine, really good, made adv. 15 team
Woodbury-turner, all around good player
Actually I think he was all-conference.wbmd wrote:If I'm not mistaken, Walker Hyland was also named to the honorable mention all-conference team last year.SEC Scotty wrote:Every time I watched Woodbury last year I was impressed with the play of Walker Hyland. I think he stood out as a sophomore on the blueline.wbmd wrote: David Eddy was far from being the only reason Woodbury was good last season or even the previous season.
Good goaltending, guys stepping up when not expected to -- such as Mike Nelson in the 3AA finals -- and the coaching of Wes Bolin.
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:27 pm
Hyland was good but also had a fair amount of penalties as well. He had a couple of really critical ones in the Benilde game that completely turned the tide.komada77 wrote:Actually I think he was all-conference.wbmd wrote:If I'm not mistaken, Walker Hyland was also named to the honorable mention all-conference team last year.SEC Scotty wrote:Every time I watched Woodbury last year I was impressed with the play of Walker Hyland. I think he stood out as a sophomore on the blueline.
He did have some critical penalties, but I think (or maybe hope) that had quite a bit to do with inexperience/nerves, given that he was a sophomore playing in his first ever state tourney and was also the best defenseman on the team.slapstkhound wrote:Hyland was good but also had a fair amount of penalties as well. He had a couple of really critical ones in the Benilde game that completely turned the tide.komada77 wrote:Actually I think he was all-conference.wbmd wrote: If I'm not mistaken, Walker Hyland was also named to the honorable mention all-conference team last year.
Everyone hates private schools (and Edina)!!
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:38 am
yes i think so. Woodbury and CDH usually make it to their section championship, if not play eachother. and I think White Bear will make a run this year. Not that they are a sleeper, because they always to pretty good, but I think they will surprise alot of people coming down the stretch. Roseville also makes good runs in the playoffs, and if it comes down to a WBL vs HM game for section 4AA i think an upset is stirring.komada77 wrote:Another question for you all: Is there a team in the SEC who will make the state tourney next year?
losing is still far from optional
-
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:06 pm
SEC hockey is a cakewalk aka easy schedule.Pucknutz69 wrote:Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: Suburban East Conference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
is it just me or are White Bear and Woodbury going to have the easiet schedules ever battling for a first place spot. whos going to win this conference?
_________________
losing is still far from optional
Nice first post newbbie. Now go away. Anyone that thinks SEC is an easy schedule is a dumbass!
AY
i dont think im a dumbass for thinking white bear and woodbury dont have tough schedules. playing moundsview, forest lake and park for a hard schedule...oh and dont forget those hastings raiders doesnt sound to hard...and CDH is only giong to have one half way decent line, they have no depth. wbl and woodbury have solid players all over the roster. we're not playing football here pucknutz.(cdh,moundsview,woodbury all top 7 in state for football) this is hockey and last time i checked wbl and woodbury WILL have easier schedules than usualPucknutz69 wrote:Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: Suburban East Conference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
is it just me or are White Bear and Woodbury going to have the easiet schedules ever battling for a first place spot. whos going to win this conference?
_________________
losing is still far from optional
Nice first post newbbie. Now go away. Anyone that thinks SEC is an easy schedule is a dumbass!
losing is still far from optional
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
-
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:06 pm
-
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:09 pm
I guess we wait. But, based on what I have seen with these teams from thier youth hockey days I would say Woodbury and WBL have a good shot at GETTING to STATE. I think it will be Edinas year but this will be one of the best tournaments top to bottom. This age group is one of the most talented groups the State has had in a long time.
All are contenders.
Section 2AA Edina
Section 3AA CDH/Woodbury
Section 4AA Hill/WBL
Section 5AA Centennial
Section 6AA Eden Prairie/Minnetonka
Section 7AA Duluth East/Grand Rapids
Section 8AA Moorhead
Section 3AA
Woodbury hasn't lost anyone from this group of bantams, very good coaching
CDH has tremendous athletes and grooms winners
Section 4AA
WBL is on a mission, all of them sticking around says something considering they hate the coach so much
Section 7AA
Flake will surprise someone in sections, not make it but I could them upsetting someone this year
All are contenders.
Section 2AA Edina
Section 3AA CDH/Woodbury
Section 4AA Hill/WBL
Section 5AA Centennial
Section 6AA Eden Prairie/Minnetonka
Section 7AA Duluth East/Grand Rapids
Section 8AA Moorhead
Section 3AA
Woodbury hasn't lost anyone from this group of bantams, very good coaching
CDH has tremendous athletes and grooms winners
Section 4AA
WBL is on a mission, all of them sticking around says something considering they hate the coach so much
Section 7AA
Flake will surprise someone in sections, not make it but I could them upsetting someone this year
-
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:12 pm
- Location: The Channel 4 News Room
Not even gonna give Mattson a chance? Come on now, we saw what Burnsville almost did with one line and a hot goaltender that night. And no shot for Roseau either? Youre losing all your credibility fast my friend. Section 1 not sending a team to the X this year? This guy's washed up...Pucknutz69 wrote:I guess we wait. But, based on what I have seen with these teams from thier youth hockey days I would say Woodbury and WBL have a good shot at GETTING to STATE. I think it will be Edinas year but this will be one of the best tournaments top to bottom. This age group is one of the most talented groups the State has had in a long time.
All are contenders.
Section 2AA Edina
Section 3AA CDH/Woodbury
Section 4AA Hill/WBL
Section 5AA Centennial
Section 6AA Eden Prairie/Minnetonka
Section 7AA Duluth East/Grand Rapids
Section 8AA Moorhead
Section 3AA
Woodbury hasn't lost anyone from this group of bantams, very good coaching
CDH has tremendous athletes and grooms winners
Section 4AA
WBL is on a mission, all of them sticking around says something considering they hate the coach so much
Section 7AA
Flake will surprise someone in sections, not make it but I could them upsetting someone this year
Stay Classy, Minnesota.
-
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:12 pm
- Location: The Channel 4 News Room
A. I understand that was his point and I was helping him add in other contenders, since that was the word he used.GBombay29 wrote:I think what he means is, there are some really good teams this year.
AHA isn't deep enough, Mattson can't do it on his own.
Roseau had to big of a turnover.
Burnsville what they did and what they almost did are 2 different things.
B. My Burnsville point was they weren't deep at all, like AHA, and just about won that game. So, to not put AHA in the "contenders" category, i believe, is not right.
C. Barnes+Hendrickson vs Mattson and a few Reillys? AHA might have a better shot.
D. Define turnover.
E. Roseau will always be in contention as far as I'm concerned
F. To get back on topic, Woodbury's got a solid team but lost a few to many key players to repeat. Go Bears?
Stay Classy, Minnesota.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:15 pm
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:55 pm
-
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm
Charliedog wrote:Roseville made their team selections after just one day of tryouts. They had to cut a few goalies, but everyone else who tried out appeared to make JV or Varsity. They had less than 40 kids trying out. This surprises me because I had always heard they had a very strong youth program.
Totino Grace.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm