Kevin Hartzell

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
Reggie
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:39 am
Location: Northwoods

Kevin Hartzell

Post by Reggie » Wed May 09, 2012 2:35 am

Contract was not renewed. Who next in SF?

demongoed
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:41 pm

Post by demongoed » Wed May 09, 2012 6:32 pm

It will be interesting to see. With the appointment of Garrity as CEO, and the way the Stampede website announcement focuses almost exclusively on his revenue-generating accomplishments for NHL teams as his greatest qualification, it should concern any player thinking of playing with the Stampede.

http://www.sfstampede.com/index.php?opt ... &Itemid=57

Hartzell was highly respected for many things, including how well he prepared and advocated for his players to top college programs. It doesn't seem like this is something the new owners care about. Everyone knows that at the end of the day, the USHL is a business, but with an additional mission of moving kids to the next level. Time will tell if the new ownership values this or not. From what I've read so far, they don't.

observer
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:45 am

Post by observer » Wed May 09, 2012 7:50 pm

Why would growing revenue be a concern for players? More money sounds like a good thing to me.

demongoed
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:41 pm

Post by demongoed » Wed May 09, 2012 8:46 pm

More money is a good thing. I was just commenting on the lack of any mention of the new owners' interest in player development. These kids are not professionals, and this is not the NHL. These kids have a limited time in this league to make an impact. If all the new owners are interested in is profits, little time will be spent on helping these kids make the next step to college hockey, which the players are told is one of the main values and goals of this league.

fastncrash
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:42 am

Hartzell/Eades

Post by fastncrash » Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:09 pm

Hartzell was an excellent Coach and you can't question any of his achievements with what he had to work with. With a NEW $120 Million Dollar Arena being built, It was simply time for a change and a focus on additional revenue creation was a large factor as it took a small "Act of God" to get the Arena approved by the tax-payers in Sioux Falls.

mulefarm
Posts: 1668
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:01 am

Re: Hartzell/Eades

Post by mulefarm » Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:35 pm

fastncrash wrote:Hartzell was an excellent Coach and you can't question any of his achievements with what he had to work with. With a NEW $120 Million Dollar Arena being built, It was simply time for a change and a focus on additional revenue creation was a large factor as it took a small "Act of God" to get the Arena approved by the tax-payers in Sioux Falls.
Sounds like a great reason to get rid of an excellent coach. Not sure that there is a big difference between Hartzell and Eades when it comes to the creation of new revenue. My guess that Hartzell probably helped getting the new arena and then was shown the door?

fastncrash
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Hartzell/Eades

Post by fastncrash » Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:56 pm

mulefarm wrote:
fastncrash wrote:Hartzell was an excellent Coach and you can't question any of his achievements with what he had to work with. With a NEW $120 Million Dollar Arena being built, It was simply time for a change and a focus on additional revenue creation was a large factor as it took a small "Act of God" to get the Arena approved by the tax-payers in Sioux Falls.
Sounds like a great reason to get rid of an excellent coach. Not sure that there is a big difference between Hartzell and Eades when it comes to the creation of new revenue. My guess that Hartzell probably helped getting the new arena and then was shown the door?
AS I said, he's a great Coach in my mind... However finishing LAST in the League the year before, and close to the bottom the previous two... doesn't protect the investment.

mulefarm
Posts: 1668
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:01 am

Post by mulefarm » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:18 pm

In that league the bottom line is winning, no problem seeing him fired for that reason. He holds the tryouts, picks the team and is responsible for the on ice product, which hasn't be good.

Post Reply