Scores and Updates: Sat., Dec. 8, 2012

Camden · Post by **Camden** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:56 pm

keepyourheadup wrote:Lakeville South 4
Prior Lake 3

South scores twice in the last 30 seconds

Ouch! What a tough way to lose.

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:16 pm

In the 2nd Period:

Elk River 3
Andover 0

koho snipe · Post by **koho snipe** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm

Any Burnsville score vs eastview

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:55 pm

ER and Andover still 3-0 in the 3rd. There was a big fight in the 2nd with two players from each team ejected.

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:02 pm

4-1 ER. Another player tossed from ER.

BodyShots · Post by **BodyShots** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:09 pm

East Metro All Stars beat the West Metro All Stars 4 - 2

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:14 pm

Moundsview adds a goal with 1 second left in the 2nd period to go up 8-4 of Forest Lake. FL's backup goalie went in at the start of the 2nd.

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:16 pm

Elk River beats Andover 4-1.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:10 pm

6 EP
5 AHA

Yes, a loss, but looks like the Stars are back.

almostashappy · Post by **almostashappy** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:11 pm

Eagan 8
Rosemount 0

shots 49 to 12

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:17 pm

Moundsview 11
Forest Lake 6

clutterbuck22 · Post by **clutterbuck22** » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:50 pm

HShockeywatcher wrote:6 EP
5 AHA

Yes, a loss, but looks like the Stars are back.

Saw that ep scored with 3.7 seconds left in the game to get the win. Also mayo tops jm 2 to 0

MNhockey29 · Post by **MNhockey29** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:29 am

Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:56 am

MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?

It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

Zamman · Post by **Zamman** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:59 am

TheHockeyDJ wrote:
MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?
It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.

Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

HShockeywatcher · Post by **HShockeywatcher** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:07 am

Zamman wrote:
TheHockeyDJ wrote:
MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?
It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.
Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

I agree it won't happen, but how do you mean to cannot happen? Obviously they couldn't have two match ups in football, but they could play one.

I also don't think it would be a great idea because then some teams in some regions would get great match ups all season and others would be terrible. It could work if we divided up into 8 sections, each into two subsections. Top 4 in each subsection make the playoffs...or something similar.

TheHockeyDJ · Post by **TheHockeyDJ** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:17 am

Zamman wrote:
TheHockeyDJ wrote:
MNhockey29 wrote:Was the Andover/Elk River game a section or conference game?
It was a section and conference game I'm fairly certain, though conferences are completely irrelevant. I wish the MSHSL would follow Dave Esse's recommendation and delete all conferences and base schedules strictly on section assignment with 2 game vs. every team in a section.
Cannot and won't happen, there are many sports to work with than just hockey.

Why can't they eliminate conferences in just hockey? They make absolutely no sense. I think that you could have some agreements in scheduling, but to keep standings for a conference even now is just a bunch of nonsense. Winning a conference is the equivalent of getting a yellow participation ribbon on track and field day in elementary school.

SPUDNUT · Post by **SPUDNUT** » Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:33 pm

What a comedy - the topic is captioned "Scores and Updates" !