MCTV showed the replay a couple of times and it was hard to see the puck at all. The tv guy couldn't tell either and someone told him it was kicked in.. Did Larson even argue the call? It didn't appear on the broadcast that he did. Good to see the refs got it right.PuckRanger wrote:"To say the least"?howardst wrote:Westerholm was not mentioned as he struggled to say the least early in the year and is today making the biggest impact in 7a![]()
I disagree with that entirely... not even a hint of reality in that statement.
Westerholm has not struggled at any point this season. He did not start against Cloquet and did not play in a couple of other games. He faced a combined 80 shots in the 3-3 and 2-2 ties Virginia had against I Falls and Eveleth early in the season. He did all he could to keep Virginia in their game against Grand Rapids (it was 3-2 well into the 3rd period before the flood gates opened... for the only time they have on him all year despite being put under constant heavy stress). He has faced more than 37 shots in 8 of the 14 games he has started. Against teams like Rapids, Brainerd, and Eagan, a very high percentage of those were high quality shots.
In fact, his "worst" game was a 27 save performance against Greenway early in the season where he faced 31 shots. In 10 of his 14 starts his save percentage was .927 or better (and the 4 games that were lower have been spread out throughout the schedule against Greenway in the aforementioned game, and the 3 AA teams I also already mentioned).
The reality is that the young team around him has gotten a little better, thus garnering the attention he is getting (and deserves) because they are able to score a few goals and lessen the pressure to some degree. As a result, instead of a game going in the direction of a 4-1 loss, it ends up 3-2 and those games that were ties are now two goal wins. Westerholm has been very consistent and VERY good through ALL of it from day 1.
...................................
As for the no-goal in the Greenway/Virginia game, it was originally called a goal and signaled as a goal by the referee nearest to the play. The referee and linesman came skating in immediately to discuss the play. They eventually ruled it went in off of his hand (not thrown in or kicked in). I was standing behind the glass on that end of the ice and saw it pretty clearly. #7 from Virginia tried to swat the puck out of the air with his stick and it appeared that he missed it and hit his glove and ricocheted over the Greenway goalie into the net. He did not catch it and throw it in the net. The replays shown at the arena were poor and you could not see the puck at any point until it was in the net, therefor the fans could not see a reason for the change in call and were upset as you would expect. Even some of the people standing by me thought he hit it with his stick. The call, however, was correct. Even the player knew it, he did not even attempt to celebrate until his teammates mobbed him (that you can see on the replay).
There was a funny sequence involving the refs. Greenway had a 2 on 1 and the Raider with the puck and the ref collided near the boards, spoiling the rush. Clafton was apopletic, and understandably so. On the replay it looked like the ref turned with his knees bent at the last moment, and had he stayed flat against the boards the collision might have been avoided.
On this same sequence, Greenway had good pressure and a Virginia player finally got the puck and iced it, except it hit a different ref near center ice! So Virginia was able to clear the puck without getting an icing. Now that is some hometown reffing.


Westerholm is fantastic, but Seitz is also keeping that team afloat. Kid is a sniper. You have to be so careful when he's on the forecheck, because he'll turn even the smallest mistake into a quality scoring chance in a hurry.
That was a fun game to watch. Greenway pouring 55 shots on goal was insane.