Stabbin31 wrote:Unless you have paid professional stat keepers, there is always going to be some variance in counts.
As far as attendence, I have been to a few Ice Hawks games, each had to have 1000 plus. Plus that rink seats like 4000, so 1500 can look a lot smaller then it really is. They keep gate records in Roch, tickets sold v. tickets used. My guess is their numbers are pretty close.
The game I went to v. Wisco on New Years eve last year, there were easily over 2000 there. It was louder for a T3 game then a lot of the D1 games I have been to. Great atmospher for the kids.
The Rec Center holds 2500, not 4000. The biggest crowd ever in there was 2800 for a Century/Austin section final and there were people everywhere; on the steps, all around the glass, and on the roof area. The local paper puts Ice Hawks attendance at 1200-1800 for most games, the way the building is configured 1800 would look nearly like a sell out. Head counts usually put the Ice Hawks attendance at 500-600. The Mustangs used to have to have an accurate count (by USHL standards)and they drew in the 700 range and they outdrew the Ice Hawks by a fair amount.
Playing Tier 3 hockey in front of 600 people is something though as some other teams are lucky to draw 100. The Owatonna team had to move their home playoff games to Dodge County and put maybe 100 in there for those games.
Comparing Ice Hawks games to NAHL games isn't fair, the Ice Hawks play against some really poor teams, teams that wouldn't beat half the high school teams. The Hawks also only have a couple of kids each year that could make an NAHL roster and the Ice Hawks are usually head and shoulders above the rest of their league, nearly everyone on an NAHL roster could make a MJHL roster though. Could the Ice Hawks in their current configuration compete in the NAHL? Probably though they'd get beat quite a bit, they don't have the depth an NAHL team has nor the goaltending. At best they'd be a bottom third team.
I don't think the Ice Hawks could go NAHL and make it financially, right now they have a pretty good thing going; winning nearly every night and very little travel which holds costs way down. Also the cost per player is higher than NAHL, NAHL players only pay room and board; around $250-$400 a month, the MJHL collects a fee of around $6,500 per player to play. If the Ice Hawks went to the next level they'd have a lot of money to make up, from extra travel to equipment to player fees they would not now be getting. Fatis has a pretty good thing going in Rochester, the league has it's problems such as it's top francise left for the CSHL in 2006, but appears to be financially in good shape. I'm not sure what the reward for the owners would be in moving to the NAHL, the city failed to draw for a USHL team why would their attendance improve darmaitcally for a n NAHL team?