Weakest section in single A?

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

gotcha
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:37 am

Weakest section in single A?

Post by gotcha » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:52 pm

Now that were closer to the season id like to hear what people think or what their predictions are?

h20
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:19 pm

Post by h20 » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:39 pm

Dumb post , anybody with any sense Knows It Section 3 A. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure this out

Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher » Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:36 pm

Clearly 3A. It's got to be right up there for the weakest of all time, in any mshsl sport.
The U invented swagger.

Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:02 pm

Might as well have some fun with it :D
I'm picking New Ulm......


8)

fivehole628
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:56 pm

Post by fivehole628 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:30 am

Litchfield

rickwardo44
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:43 pm

Post by rickwardo44 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:08 pm

litchfield wouldnt go to state
they cant even beat the little sisters of the poor

Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:17 pm

rickwardo44 wrote:litchfield wouldnt go to state
they cant even beat the little sisters of the poor
That's because LSOTP used to recruit :) but now that that's over Litch has got as good a shot as any of whippin up on the LSOTP....so hows about you pick your favorite now rick! :lol:

8)

suntzu
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:15 am

Post by suntzu » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:20 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
rickwardo44 wrote:litchfield wouldnt go to state
they cant even beat the little sisters of the poor
That's because LSOTP used to recruit :) but now that that's over Litch has got as good a shot as any of whippin up on the LSOTP....so hows about you pick your favorite now rick! :lol:

8)
Actually,CNT, if LSOTP were in this section they would be a heavy favorite!

Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:23 pm

suntzu wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
rickwardo44 wrote:litchfield wouldnt go to state
they cant even beat the little sisters of the poor
That's because LSOTP used to recruit :) but now that that's over Litch has got as good a shot as any of whippin up on the LSOTP....so hows about you pick your favorite now rick! :lol:

8)
Actually,CNT, if LSOTP were in this section they would be a heavy favorite!
I guess they went to a AA section :shock:

8)

Stealth
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:05 pm

Post by Stealth » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:57 pm

From looking at the Youth Forum side, maybe the Buffalo Bantam A Youth program could get some matches going in 3A? Travel would not be too bad?


My guess would be Willmar win this 3A section.

bombsquad06
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:52 pm

Post by bombsquad06 » Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:19 pm

I would say Willmar or New Ulm. I dont think either team lost much last year. I know NU lost only 4 players off of a section final team with a first year coach last year. I also hear that Willmar's JV was good?

RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by RLStars » Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:18 pm

bombsquad06 wrote:I would say Willmar or New Ulm. I dont think either team lost much last year. I know NU lost only 4 players off of a section final team with a first year coach last year. I also hear that Willmar's JV was good?
Willmar lost 12 seniors, but I see them being much better then last season.

puckeyone
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:34 pm

Post by puckeyone » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:12 pm

hey stealth , would that Buffalo A bantam team be made up of most of the ones that tied the River lakes A Bantams last year , if so i think they got all they can handle at the bantam level, without entering the weakest section ever known to mankind. But its not the palyers fault this was made up this way, anyway its Hutch,New Ulm or Willmar, who ever has the hottest goalie thru the run will win it

flatontheice
Posts: 883
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Post by flatontheice » Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:50 am

1A for sure

suntzu
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:15 am

Post by suntzu » Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:53 am

flatontheice wrote:1A for sure
Really? Lourdes, Red Wing and New Prague should all be Top 20 Single A teams this year. Even Faribault would win Section 3A in a cakewalk.

Not quite the weakest section in the state.

southernmnscout
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:08 pm

Post by southernmnscout » Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:55 am

flatontheice wrote:1A for sure
flatontheice, Maybe you need to check out the sections before you say something is for sure. I bet there are at least 4 teams in Section 1A that would beat the section champ from 3A.

Either know what you are saying before you go on a post rampage posting as much as possible or at least do a little research!

Stealth
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:05 pm

Post by Stealth » Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:25 pm

Puckeyone, it was a joke from the Youth forum. :wink:

puckeyone
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:34 pm

Post by puckeyone » Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:42 pm

ok - you got me. i fell for it all the waty inot the manure pile. :o :o

Bhindthemask
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:43 pm

Post by Bhindthemask » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:05 am

To all of you from 1A who wanna jump on the 3A bashing band wagon, just remember 2 of the top teams from 1A last year are now in 3A this year. Which would tell me that if your team was a member of section 1A last year you don't have a lot of room to be running your mouth this year. I am happy for all of you arrogant people in 1A that you don't have to be everyones dog to kick this year and you can join in on the fun.
Last edited by Bhindthemask on Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Bhindthemask
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:43 pm

Post by Bhindthemask » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:30 am

So 3A is obviously the weakest section in the state, we know that. It is also obvious that 1A is only better because of the teams that were brought in this year (i.e. Lourdes, Red Wing, New Prague). 1A also lost 2 good teams in NU and Marshall who I believe would put a good fight against any 1A team this year.

southernmnscout
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:08 pm

Post by southernmnscout » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:35 am

Bhindthemask wrote:So 3A is obviously the weakest section in the state, we know that. It is also obvious that 1A is only better because of the teams that were brought in this year (i.e. Lourdes, Red Wing, New Prague). 1A also lost 2 good teams in NU and Marshall who I believe would put a good fight against any 1A team this year.
I don't think that NU or Marshall would be able to beat RW, NP, Faribault, or Lourdes this year?

I do say that it will be a great experience for the kids from the 3A team to get to the X this year though. It will be a team that has never been to the State tourney or at least has not been in a very very long time. Should be a very competitive section tournament!

Bhindthemask
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:43 pm

Post by Bhindthemask » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:44 am

You are probably right scout. However I said it would be a close game, I never said 3A would win these games. But look who you listed from 1A, RW, Lourdes, New Prague, Fairibault. The best way to look at this scenerio is this. If your team was in 1A last year and you still are this year, you just lost any hope of going to the X. If you moved from 1A to 3A your chances of getting to the X just got a whole lot better. So, I guess if your more concerned with your pride, it's better to be in 1A, but if your looking to get to the X, give me 3A. Thats why they are called competetive section assignments.

davey
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:46 am

Post by davey » Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:57 am

Bhindthemask wrote:You are probably right scout. However I said it would be a close game, I never said 3A would win these games. But look who you listed from 1A, RW, Lourdes, New Prague, Fairibault. The best way to look at this scenerio is this. If your team was in 1A last year and you still are this year, you just lost any hope of going to the X. If you moved from 1A to 3A your chances of getting to the X just got a whole lot better. So, I guess if your more concerned with your pride, it's better to be in 1A, but if your looking to get to the X, give me 3A. Thats why they are called competetive section assignments.
I'm guessing this might be some pretty good locker room material for the boys from Albert Lea and West...two teams that stayed in 1A and will give those above mentioned teams a run for their money. What's the love for Faribault..not sure what everybody sees to like them so much. Granted, they have Smuda and Pavek back, but what else.

Bhindthemask
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:43 pm

Post by Bhindthemask » Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:17 am

davey, i don't believe Fairibault is in this group, I just listed the teams the that scout had. However I just don't think AL or West has what it takes to get through these teams, but thats why the game is played on the ice and not on paper.

davey
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:46 am

Post by davey » Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:32 am

Bhindthemask wrote:davey, i don't believe Fairibault is in this group, I just listed the teams the that scout had. However I just don't think AL or West has what it takes to get through these teams, but thats why the game is played on the ice and not on paper.
Bhtm tell me why you think Lourdes, NP and RW are the class of this Section

Post Reply