Rankings as of Dec. 2nd

MNRinkRat · Post by **MNRinkRat** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:47 am

Feel free to post what your rankings are as well. I'm only going to do AA.

1/Edina
2/Roseau
3/Hill-Murray
4/Centennial
5/Holy Angels
6/Duluth East
7/Benilde-St. Margaret's
8/White Bear Lake
9/Eden Prairie
10/Blaine

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:16 am

WHERES FOREST LAKE?

goldenhockey20 · Post by **goldenhockey20** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:07 pm

1/Edina
2/Roseau
3/Hill-Murray
4/AHA
5/Centennial
6/Duluth East
7/Eden Prairie
8/Burnsville
9/Blaine
10/Jefferson

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:43 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:WHERES FOREST LAKE?

North of White Bear Lake

TTpuckster · Post by **TTpuckster** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:47 pm

wbmd wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:WHERES FOREST LAKE?
North of White Bear Lake

Now WBMD.

North of HUGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:51 pm

1/Edina
2/Hill-Murray
3/Roseau
4/Forest Lake
5/Holy Angels
6/Duluth East
7/Benilde-St. Margaret's
8/Minnetonka
9/Eden Prairie
10/Blaine

BIAFP · Post by **BIAFP** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:06 pm

Roseau
Edina
Duluth East
EP
Burnsville
Blaine
Minnetonka

The rest are pretenders

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:36 pm

2008 State Tourney Results:

1st Hill-Murray
2nd Duluth East
3rd Edina
4th Centennial
5th BSM
6th CDH

The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.

He Hate Me · Post by **He Hate Me** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:39 pm

pistol wrote:2008 State Tourney Results:

1st Hill-Murray
2nd Duluth East
3rd Edina
4th Centennial
5th BSM
6th CDH

The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.

sir what about Roseau?

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:44 pm

He Hate Me wrote:
pistol wrote:The rest of the top teams wish they played in Section 1 or 8.
sir what about Roseau?

Are they not still Section 8, or have they already moved down to class A?

Regardless, there is no way to determine 7th or 8th place in the State Tourney, so in order not to play favorites, neither are listed.

He Hate Me · Post by **He Hate Me** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:54 pm

sir 8AA- home of the Roseau Rams

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:04 pm

Sorry, the Rams (lost to a Blaine team missing most of its key players) are out of contention this year.

2nd string · Post by **2nd string** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:07 pm

Let me see Roseau has played has played two games and has a two and zero record so, I'm not following

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:10 pm

Check out the "new here" thread....

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:15 pm

He Hate Me wrote:sir 8AA- home of the Roseau Rams

If you only knew how far out of your league you are...

But I'm enjoying it just the same!

fkahckyprofessor20 · Post by **fkahckyprofessor20** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:19 pm

This whole Blaine beating Roseau thread is getting way out of hand. It was a scrimmage!! Until somebody beats Roseau that shouldn't in a regular season game, they've got to be in everybody's top 5.

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:22 pm

Not EVERYBODY'S!

He Hate Me · Post by **He Hate Me** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:22 pm

out of my league? is there something i dont understand? i dont understand these people saying roseau is not good becuase they lost to Blaine in a scrimmage

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:26 pm

fkahckyprofessor20 wrote: they've got to be in everybody's top 5.

Everybody might be a little strong, stick with rational people and I'll agree. For now.

I don't understand why they have such a weak schedule though.

petern3 · Post by **petern3** » Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:49 pm

Edina
Roseau
Hill Murray
Blaine
Duluth East
Burnsville
Centennial
Moorhead
Holy Angels
Minnetonka

pucknstick10 · Post by **pucknstick10** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:02 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
fkahckyprofessor20 wrote: they've got to be in everybody's top 5.
Everybody might be a little strong, stick with rational people and I'll agree. For now.

I don't understand why they have such a weak schedule though.

I am going to guess that Roseau's "weak" schedule as you put it has to do with geography more than anything else. It's just to far away to play the top metro teams in the state. It plays the teams in its area and a few teams out of the area.

wishock · Post by **wishock** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:49 am

Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:50 am

wishock wrote:Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.

Moorhead doesn't seem to have a problem, DE either...

HockeyFan1 · Post by **HockeyFan1** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:54 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
wishock wrote:Yes, if you look at a map it is pretty obvious. Remote part of the state. They play who they can without the 7 or 8 hour bus ride to every game.
Moorhead doesn't seem to have a problem, DE either...

Here we go again.....

there's quite a difference between a 7+ hour bus ride, and a 2-3 hour bus ride my friend.......

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:58 am

Here we go again?

Moorhead to the Cities is a wee bit more than two hours my friend. I'm not saying every week, but one trip a year seems reasonable. Friday and Saturday night.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Rankings as of Dec. 2nd

Rankings as of Dec. 2nd

Re: Why not? It could happen!