Hill-Murray Pioneers vs. Benilde st. margarets

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

ccm911
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:22 pm

Hill-Murray Pioneers vs. Benilde st. margarets

Post by ccm911 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:58 pm

Game is at Aldrich On Tuesday. Any Thoughts? Least year was an overtime thriller for Hill-Murray.

rbk28
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:22 am

Post by rbk28 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:02 pm

close game..ill take HM 3-2 bcuz of aldrich

sachishi4
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: SLP

Post by sachishi4 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:16 pm

ill be there cheerin my boys

Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:21 pm

BSM has a good team this year. But Sparlimb and Parchisi's team will be too much for them. 7-3 Hill.

saintpaulhockey
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 7:59 pm

Post by saintpaulhockey » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:49 pm

6-4 H-M, with an empty net. Two fast teams, should be an exciting game.

Sparlimb
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:31 pm

This game is for Neut and his Centennial boys...


4-1 HM over BSM

STEV16
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:44 pm
Location: On The Pond

Post by STEV16 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:51 pm

I'll be their, and I'll take H-M 4-2

mnhockey07
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:46 pm

Post by mnhockey07 » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:39 pm

HM-5
BSM-3
Anyone know how Zierke is doing? Didnt he get kicked off the team last year?

Hillfan
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 4:48 pm

Post by Hillfan » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:52 pm

I'll second Sparlimb's 4-1 H-M prediction.

Another prediction: Cecka will net two of the goals.

Should be a fun one to see, good luck to the Pioneers!

RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by RLStars » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:54 pm

BSM..........3
H-M...........2

Just gotta go against the grain every so often.

Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 » Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:54 pm

Hillfan wrote:.... good luck to the Pioneers!
Luck? It's in the bag!

packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:35 pm

I dont think "It's In The Bag" for HM.

Anybody who plays BSM this year is in for a battle. I'd be more inclined to say it's all "Up for Grabs " .

I dont think picking BSM goes "Against the Grain" all that much nor is it going "Out On a Limb" to say they will win.

BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:43 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
Hillfan wrote:.... good luck to the Pioneers!
Luck? It's in the bag!


Actually done pretty well betting against the Pioneers, like last year at The Show...........two and out...... cha-ching! :lol:

hockeyxprt1
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 10:41 am

Post by hockeyxprt1 » Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:55 pm

mnhockey07 wrote:HM-5
BSM-3
Anyone know how Zierke is doing? Didnt he get kicked off the team last year?
Zierke is having a great year so far, around 5 points in 2 games. He has really provided a spark in the BSM line-up. After playing a year of juniors (Owls of MJHL), he has transitioned nicely back to high school hockey. BSM's top line of Berglund-Zierke-Appelhoff can skate with anyone including the mighty pioneers. I'll take BSM 5-3.

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:02 pm

BIAFP,

Those who bet against the Pioneers on a regular basis usually end up broke. You may get them every now & then, but over the long haul, they will always take your money. You never see a casino go out of business & it appears "business" at Hill is pretty good. So keep keep betting against the Pioneers BIAFP, we need your money for new recruits....ooppss, did I say that out loud?

Hockeyguy_27
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm

Post by Hockeyguy_27 » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:04 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:BIAFP,

Those who bet against the Pioneers on a regular basis usually end up broke. You may get them every now & then, but over the long haul, they will always take your money. You never see a casino go out of business & it appears "business" at Hill is pretty good. So keep keep betting against the Pioneers BIAFP, we need your money for new recruits....ooppss, did I say that out loud?
Hill wins 5-3 in a close one.

RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by RLStars » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:19 pm

packerboy wrote:I dont think "It's In The Bag" for HM.

Anybody who plays BSM this year is in for a battle. I'd be more inclined to say it's all "Up for Grabs " .

I dont think picking BSM goes "Against the Grain" all that much nor is it going "Out On a Limb" to say they will win.
This should have been a "Poll" thread.

When I posted there were already 8 postes for Hill. My lone post for BSM puts it against the grain.

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:20 pm

As for the game itself, I suspect a pretty tight afair. 2 good teams with solid coaching. I'll go with Hill 3-2 as they get some home cooking from the Refs and get a poweplay goal in the 3rd. Nice early season test for both teams.

packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Post by packerboy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:33 pm

RLStars wrote:
packerboy wrote:I dont think "It's In The Bag" for HM.

Anybody who plays BSM this year is in for a battle. I'd be more inclined to say it's all "Up for Grabs " .

I dont think picking BSM goes "Against the Grain" all that much nor is it going "Out On a Limb" to say they will win.
This should have been a "Poll" thread.

When I posted there were already 8 postes for Hill. My lone post for BSM puts it against the grain.
Good point. The grain is definatley green and easy to read so far.

But for me, it has deteroriated into speaking in old thread titles. :lol:

BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP » Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:46 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:
Those who bet against the Pioneers on a regular basis usually end up broke. You may get them every now & then, but over the long haul, they will always take your money. You never see a casino go out of business & it appears "business" at Hill is pretty good. So keep keep betting against the Pioneers BIAFP, we need your money for new recruits....ooppss, did I say that out loud?

Nobody would be foolish enough to bet against them on a regular basis PPguy. That would mean betting on the regular season patsies they schedule every year. Betting against them when it means something against any quality opponent is a very profitable venture. Like last years tourney....two and get out the golf clubs :lol:

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:07 pm

Ah, but how many others had several rounds of golf in before the Pioneers actually hit the course?

BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:10 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:Ah, but how many others had several rounds of golf in before the Pioneers actually hit the course?
When the only real team you ever have to beat to get there is WBL that is O Forever in first round tourney games, is it really an accomplishment?

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:24 pm

So now we need to apologize for being assigned to a certain section? Makes sense. #-o Curious, do support a particular team, or do you stand behind a curtain and take shots at programs without making yourself available?

AngusYoung
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:06 pm

Post by AngusYoung » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:33 pm

BIAFP is a staunch supporter of the Moorhead Spuds. He is well known around these parts by his alter-ego handle, "Slapshooter".

AY 8)

Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy » Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:40 pm

That can't be. Nobody would take a shot at a school (WB) after seeing that team beat their team (Spuds). And a person would lose credablity taking a shot at a program's history of winning at least 1 state title (HM) when their team has failed to do so. So there is no way BIAFP would be a supporter of Moorhead...you must be wrong. It's obvious, he is a fan of Roseau....you know, that small tiny little program up north that won't allow the Spuds to come to St. Paul & hang with the big boys.

Post Reply