CATHEDRAL VS APOLLO

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Who takes it?

Crusaders
10
50%
Eagles
10
50%
 
Total votes: 20

Dirty Dangler
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:16 pm

CATHEDRAL VS APOLLO

Post by Dirty Dangler » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:05 pm

What are some final predictions?
Last edited by Dirty Dangler on Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:54 pm

I don't know what the score will be. For my wallet's sake, I'm hoping Cathedral takes this one.

I'm just glad it's Cathedral's home game so Jim Michaud can't tell me where I can and can't sit.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Puckerup
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:43 pm

Post by Puckerup » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:42 am

..or what I can or can't say.

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:38 am

Puckerup wrote:..or what I can or can't say.
Well, fans shouldn't be completely classless....which is one thing that I think he was trying to keep the fans from being. But, to limit where ALL fans can sit because of what the Apollo students say is ridiculous.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Stealth
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:05 pm

Post by Stealth » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:43 am

Cathedral 7 /// Apollo 2

Blue&Gold

Post by Blue&Gold » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:56 am

I'm rooting for CHS, but I'm not sure they can hold-up under the pressure. If Poganski can stay in the game instead of giving up 5 powerplays, and whoever is in net doesn't panic, then CHS should win. However, I wouldn't put any money on it.

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:24 am

Blue&Gold wrote:I'm rooting for CHS, but I'm not sure they can hold-up under the pressure. If Poganski can stay in the game instead of giving up 5 powerplays, and whoever is in net doesn't panic, then CHS should win. However, I wouldn't put any money on it.
I've put my money on it. I think I'll regret it, but...whatever.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:32 pm

George Blanda wrote:
Blue&Gold wrote:I'm rooting for CHS, but I'm not sure they can hold-up under the pressure. If Poganski can stay in the game instead of giving up 5 powerplays, and whoever is in net doesn't panic, then CHS should win. However, I wouldn't put any money on it.
I've put my money on it. I think I'll regret it, but...whatever.

For my sake, I hope you end up regreting it.


Eagles 3
Crusaders 2
The U invented swagger.

PASTRAPIDSFAN
Posts: 3013
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Post by PASTRAPIDSFAN » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:05 pm

Eagles 4-2

CHICKA CHICKA WHAT
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by CHICKA CHICKA WHAT » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:33 pm

EAGLES-3
CRUSADERS-2[/b]

CHICKA CHICKA WHAT
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by CHICKA CHICKA WHAT » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:37 pm

I BELIEVE POGANSKI WILL LOSE IT AND COST THEIR TEAM IN PENALTIES...BUT FOR THE GOALIE... IF THEY BUCKLE UNDER PRESSURE APOLLO HAS A CHANCE TO WIN. ALSO ANOTHER FACTOR IS BRENT BUTKOWSKI. IF HE CAN STAY OUT OF THE BOX OR NOT

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:02 pm

CHICKA CHICKA WHAT wrote:I BELIEVE POGANSKI WILL LOSE IT AND COST THEIR TEAM IN PENALTIES...BUT FOR THE GOALIE... IF THEY BUCKLE UNDER PRESSURE APOLLO HAS A CHANCE TO WIN. ALSO ANOTHER FACTOR IS BRENT BUTKOWSKI. IF HE CAN STAY OUT OF THE BOX OR NOT
After two games, Butkowski had 7 penalties in just about 3 periods...Nothing has changed from last year. Some penalties he takes because he plays the game hard...but if you watch him behind the play, he does some really dumb stuff to get penalties.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

CarGuy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:38 am

Post by CarGuy » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:21 pm

cathedral will win....5 to 2......mayeb they should make a class "B" for apollo to join haha....since their enrollment is so down....but i am pretty sure enrollment isnt the prob, its the talent they dont have thats the problem!

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:41 pm

CarGuy wrote:cathedral will win....5 to 2......mayeb they should make a class "B" for apollo to join haha....since their enrollment is so down....but i am pretty sure enrollment isnt the prob, its the talent they dont have thats the problem!
The more and more I read what you say, the more and more I feel you are a kid from Apollo just trying to get some thing up on the bulletin board so the Eagles will get a little more fired up.

Cathedral doesn't view Apollo as a pushover. They will be the best team they've faced to this point.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Ben Dover
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: Bangladesh.

Post by Ben Dover » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:58 pm

Eagles 5-3

STC18
Posts: 838
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:11 am

Post by STC18 » Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:16 pm

Eagles 3-2

CarGuy
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:38 am

Post by CarGuy » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:34 pm

blanda....i didnt go to apollo...4 year letter winner in hockey at chs....i know apollo's program well and i dont respect what has happened to it and st. cloud hockey that past few years...you can thank st. cloud youth hockey program for that and thatis another story in it itself. the same reason st. cloud has slid in hockey is the same reason sartell will NEVER have a good program...any guess what it is?

mikemodano09
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:15 pm

Post by mikemodano09 » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:11 pm

SCC 3
Apollo 1
That's a final....

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:18 pm

Apollo was manhandled but was without their top two defensemen.

Didn't really matter, the score could have been worse with Butkowski in the lineup as penalties would have killed.

Final shots were 51-13.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Dirty Dangler
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:16 pm

Post by Dirty Dangler » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:29 pm

George Blanda wrote:Apollo was manhandled but was without their top two defensemen.

Didn't really matter, the score could have been worse with Butkowski in the lineup as penalties would have killed.

Final shots were 51-13.
They werent man handled until after the 2nd goal then apollo kind of lost it, but where was brent tonight.

George Blanda
Posts: 1442
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: St. Schmo

Post by George Blanda » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:55 pm

I don't know. I was only there in the 3rd period. But I'll read you a text message from a friend of mine after I asked how Cathedral was playing, "You're down one to zero. Cathedral controlled the entire first period. By controlled i mean dominated."

That's straight from a buddy of mine who attended Apollo.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey

Dirty Dangler
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:16 pm

Post by Dirty Dangler » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:39 pm

George Blanda wrote:I don't know. I was only there in the 3rd period. But I'll read you a text message from a friend of mine after I asked how Cathedral was playing, "You're down one to zero. Cathedral controlled the entire first period. By controlled i mean dominated."

That's straight from a buddy of mine who attended Apollo.
Its his opinion but i will say cathedral has a heck of a team, they got to keep up the good work. And from what i heard about pognanski and his penalties he didnt have a single one tonight that i remember, and for the rest of the team they didn't have many penalties at all but when they did they shut down apollo power play which was frustrating being an apollo fan. well done

Donkey9
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:18 am

Post by Donkey9 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:07 am

Wasn't able to make the game tonight but sounded like it was exciting... Was having Sam Lommel back in the line up a nice addition for SCC? I noticed he picked up three penalties all for roughing... Is he playing too physical or were they stupid penalties? Congrats to the Crusaders on the W over a cross town rival...

zippitydoda
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:34 pm

Post by zippitydoda » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:40 am

Okay game, fairly sloppy, though -- a LOT of missed passes and scrums of clacking sticks. CHS had some nice plays at times. Apollo struggled to get it in the zone past the CHS defense, the best part of their team. Nicest goal was the 2-1 from Rindelaub to Quist at the beginning of the third. There were some chippy penalties taken, but it always happens in crosstown matchups. Kudos to Apollo. I think they are on the right track. But they just don't have a lot in numbers coming to build on.

Puckerup
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:43 pm

Post by Puckerup » Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:44 am

Dirty Dangler wrote:
George Blanda wrote:Apollo was manhandled but was without their top two defensemen.

Didn't really matter, the score could have been worse with Butkowski in the lineup as penalties would have killed.

Final shots were 51-13.
They werent man handled until after the 2nd goal then apollo kind of lost it, but where was brent tonight.
He had to serve a game misconduct for the five penalties he took in a previous game even though no game misconduct was issued.

Post Reply