Private Schools in same Section
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Private Schools in same Section
Seems the MSHSL needs to take a hard look at putting these teams all in the same AA section. Latest roster changes at BSM are a good example. So much for "grassroots" hockey in the State when kids are able to move around these schools at will.
-
stmartin123
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:56 pm
Re: Private Schools in same Section
hahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!Vapor wrote:Seems the MSHSL needs to take a hard look at putting these teams all in the same AA section. Latest roster changes at BSM are a good example. So much for "grassroots" hockey in the State when kids are able to move around these schools at will.
Don't hate STA. I wouldn't want to lose either.
Re: Private Schools in same Section
This is a brand new topic and proposal. It merits our serious and careful consideration.Vapor wrote:Seems the MSHSL needs to take a hard look at putting these teams all in the same AA section. Latest roster changes at BSM are a good example. So much for "grassroots" hockey in the State when kids are able to move around these schools at will.
-
ThePuckStopsHere
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: Private Schools in same Section
Couldn't agree more, put them in one section along with St.Thomas, that's if the Cadets ever grow a pair and play big boy hockeyVapor wrote:Seems the MSHSL needs to take a hard look at putting these teams all in the same AA section. Latest roster changes at BSM are a good example. So much for "grassroots" hockey in the State when kids are able to move around these schools at will.
Re: Private Schools in same Section
Vapor wrote:Seems the MSHSL needs to take a hard look at putting these teams all in the same AA section. Latest roster changes at BSM are a good example. So much for "grassroots" hockey in the State when kids are able to move around these schools at will.
The Puck
LGW
LGW