Scores and Updates: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
karl(east)
Posts: 6462
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Contact:

Scores and Updates: Saturday, Dec. 1, 2012

Post by karl(east) » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:24 pm

Here you go...
Last edited by karl(east) on Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

shins
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:18 pm

Post by shins » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:24 pm

After 2 periods in International Falls, the Little Falls Flyers lead the Broncos 4-1. IF got on the board with under a minute left in the period.

shins
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:18 pm

Post by shins » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:47 pm

5-1 LF, 9:00 left in game.

stpaul
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 10:26 am

HM - Eagan

Post by stpaul » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:44 pm

Hill-Murray 3, Eagan 2 in OT

Iceburg
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Maplewood

Post by Iceburg » Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:31 pm

East Grand Forks 4, Totino Grace 4

entertaining game

Topcheese08
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:19 pm

Post by Topcheese08 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:03 pm

Cloquet 2
Bloomington Jefferson 0

End 1

thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:20 pm

End of the 1st
STA:3
Lourdes: 1

Shots 17-4

Sorry Karl. :lol:

thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:21 pm

STA 4-1
Shots 19-5

karl(east)
Posts: 6462
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Contact:

Post by karl(east) » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:23 pm

thestickler07 wrote:End of the 1st
STA:3
Lourdes: 1

Shots 17-4

Sorry Karl. :lol:
No worries. :wink:

Unless, of course, you are a fan of a Class A team other than STA...

thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:23 pm

5-1 STA
Hat Trick

thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:44 pm

End of 2
STA: 6
Lourdes: 1
Shots 27-11

thestickler07
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by thestickler07 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:17 pm

Final
STA: 8
Lourdes: 1
Shots 36-12 STA

Thank god the Gophers aren't finding a way to lose to UNO again.

goldy313
Posts: 3949
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 11:56 am

Post by goldy313 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:41 pm

Tough start for Lourdes, they had at least 5 kids playing football until last Saturday.

Tartan 4
Century 0

SECBLUES
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:28 pm

final score

Post by SECBLUES » Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:57 pm

White Bear 3

Woodbury 3

OT

Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.

PWD10
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:25 pm

Post by PWD10 » Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:50 pm

Wayzata 2-1 over ER.

SPUDNUT
Posts: 978
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Moorhead

Post by SPUDNUT » Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:06 am

Final

BSM 6
MHD 1

inthetwine
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm

Re: final score

Post by inthetwine » Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:46 am

SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3

Woodbury 3

OT

Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.

Edwardo
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:20 am

Re: final score

Post by Edwardo » Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:38 am

inthetwine wrote:
SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3

Woodbury 3

OT

Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.
38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.

HockeyWatcher10
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:50 pm

Re: final score

Post by HockeyWatcher10 » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:08 am

Edwardo wrote:
inthetwine wrote:
SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3

Woodbury 3

OT

Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.
38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.
Woodbury only dominated the first two periods. WB then took over the game in the third period by putting up two goals and having numerous other chances to score. #20 Jake Wahlin and #2 Thomas Delaney are WB's best players and were trying to step up and make big plays for the team. WB is a young team and will get better as the year goes on.

inthetwine
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:17 pm

Re: final score

Post by inthetwine » Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:25 am

Edwardo wrote:
inthetwine wrote:
SECBLUES wrote:White Bear 3

Woodbury 3

OT

Woodbury up 3 to 1 with 2 minutes remaining. White bear tied it up but couldn't seal the deal. IMO White bear is not worthy of their current ranking. Time will will prove that though.
Not sure what you men about WB's current ranking, thier not ranked very high. They did pretty much dominate Woodbury (SOG 38-22), but they just could not put the puck in the net.
38-22 was a lopsided stat, although Woodbury had less shots, they dominated the game, 80% if WB's shots were weak at best, they continue to take stupid penalties as in other years, # 20 has to learn to pass the puck as well as #2. Half the Defense are sleds, and the coach doesn't like slow defense so I thought. They will be lucky to be 500 in conference, with there lack of discipline (as usual) lack of passing ability and shooting ability. There defense not clearing in front of the net, and the typical playing favorites instead of playing as a team will all effect there outcome as history has shown.
Are you kidding, Woodbury only had 11 shots on goal until the 3rd when WB got a 5 minute penalty.

Post Reply