So you are going to tell every outstate program that the highest level team they can field is B2? Sorry Warroad, sorry Luverne, sorry Redwood Falls, sorry _________, you're too small to field an A team. The standard of competition is not Edina. Remember, if this is put into place I could envision an Edina having to field 2 AA teams along with 3 or 4 A teams. So you would no longer be playing skater #16-30 on the lone A team fielded now.The Exiled One wrote:I strongly disagree. I think you work from the bottom up. Forcing an association with 28 players to find 14 players who can compete with Edina's 2nd best team is a recipe for disaster. Getting blown out 20-0 is not going to prepare them for HS. However, if they feel that they do have 14 players who can compete with Edina's second best team, they are welcome to opt up. Requiring them to do so is ridiculous.SCBlueLiner wrote:You start with the preface that every association should field at least one A team and work from there. To my knowledge there is no Class B high school hockey so why would we limit the small associations to a max level of B2 under any proposal. Their high school teams would suffer dramatically due to lack of forcing competition throughout the players' youth career by not playing A. Plus you would see mass exodus and avoidance of small programs because they cannot field an A level team.
<30 players = A & B2 or C
....work your charts from there.
Peewee coach rant
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:11 pm
-
- Posts: 661
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:11 pm
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
Go back and read slower.SCBlueLiner wrote:So you are going to tell every outstate program that the highest level team they can field is B2?The Exiled One wrote:I strongly disagree. I think you work from the bottom up. Forcing an association with 28 players to find 14 players who can compete with Edina's 2nd best team is a recipe for disaster. Getting blown out 20-0 is not going to prepare them for HS. However, if they feel that they do have 14 players who can compete with Edina's second best team, they are welcome to opt up. Requiring them to do so is ridiculous.
EDIT: I just read your second post. Sorry for the snark.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
Here's some data to illustrate that point...SCBlueLiner wrote:Remember there can also be abuses by small associations who will play down in order to rack up wins at the expense of developing players.
How Edina's peewee declarations would change based on my table:
Current: L1, L1, L1, L1, L2, L2, L2, L2, L3, L3, L4, L5
Proposed: L1, L1, L1, L2, L2, L2, L3, L3, L3, L4, L4, L5
They should have one less C team, one less B2 team, one more B1 team, and one more A team.
Smaller associations could sandbag the same way unless we provide some sort of structure.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Mounds View and Irondale high schools should also get a year in mind for a merge so they don't lose this talent. And they will lose this talent, if they have to part for weaker (divided) high school teams.
MVI high school hockey will beat a Richfield type situation that is closing in.
Could be a very solid section contender when they get to HS age.
MVI high school hockey will beat a Richfield type situation that is closing in.
Could be a very solid section contender when they get to HS age.
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
They won't suffer the fate of Richfield because Richfield is the only HS in the district. If (or rather when) Irondale can't find enough players for a varsity team, the school district will simply merge the teams. MVHS and IHS varsity will cease to exist the same year... guaranteed. The kids will always have a place to play.MrBoDangles wrote:Mounds View and Irondale high schools should also get a year in mind for a merge so they don't lose this talent. And they will lose this talent, if they have to part for weaker (divided) high school teams.
MVI high school hockey will beat a Richfield type situation that is closing in.
Could be a very solid section contender when they get to HS age.
Second, the MSHSL won't let them merge until they definitively don't have enough players to support two varsity programs. From their perspective, it's about opportunity, not competitiveness.
Finally, the parents of the kids that don't want to play for a losing public school team simply don't want their kids to attend a public school. Very few of the St. Odelia's, St. John's, and St. Charles kids from our area will attend public high school, hockey or not. Many of our top youth players attend these schools.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
I see... But many would be surprised how many would stay with a possible powerhouse high school program. Mpls and others are starting to hold on to their elite players.The Exiled One wrote:They won't suffer the fate of Richfield because Richfield is the only HS in the district. If (or rather when) Irondale can't find enough players for a varsity team, the school district will simply merge the teams. MVHS and IHS varsity will cease to exist the same year... guaranteed. The kids will always have a place to play.MrBoDangles wrote:Mounds View and Irondale high schools should also get a year in mind for a merge so they don't lose this talent. And they will lose this talent, if they have to part for weaker (divided) high school teams.
MVI high school hockey will beat a Richfield type situation that is closing in.
Could be a very solid section contender when they get to HS age.
Second, the MSHSL won't let them merge until they definitively don't have enough players to support two varsity programs. From their perspective, it's about opportunity, not competitiveness.
Finally, the parents of the kids that don't want to play for a losing public school team simply don't want their kids to attend a public school. Very few of the St. Odelia's, St. John's, and St. Charles kids from our area will attend public high school, hockey or not. Many of our top youth players attend these schools.
This is the system that has been created. People are playing within the rules... the rules needs to be changed, lets blame the rule makers as much if not more than the "sandbaggers"
Since the MV/I team is the point of conversation, I'll use them as an example.
They really have the best of both worlds when you look at it from an associations position.
As an association you get to rack up wins, which keeps people motivated and coming back, AND be able to play some of the best AA teams in the state in tournaments and through normal scheduling.
If B teams can't skate up to A, then A teams shouldn't be allowed to skate up to AA. This might make associations think twice about declaring an association with 6 PW teams at the A level for their top team. Im guessing some parents of top players would want their kids playing against the best out there, not just most associations 15-30.
When my son started playing hockey 9 years ago, I predicted that in 20 years association hockey would be a thing of the past. While it might not happen in the next 11 years, it is going that way. MN hockey needs to realize this AA/A was a complete failure and readjust quickly before more harm is done to what was at one time the blueprint for the country when it came to youth hockey.
Since the MV/I team is the point of conversation, I'll use them as an example.
They really have the best of both worlds when you look at it from an associations position.
As an association you get to rack up wins, which keeps people motivated and coming back, AND be able to play some of the best AA teams in the state in tournaments and through normal scheduling.
If B teams can't skate up to A, then A teams shouldn't be allowed to skate up to AA. This might make associations think twice about declaring an association with 6 PW teams at the A level for their top team. Im guessing some parents of top players would want their kids playing against the best out there, not just most associations 15-30.
When my son started playing hockey 9 years ago, I predicted that in 20 years association hockey would be a thing of the past. While it might not happen in the next 11 years, it is going that way. MN hockey needs to realize this AA/A was a complete failure and readjust quickly before more harm is done to what was at one time the blueprint for the country when it came to youth hockey.
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
flpucknut wrote:This is the system that has been created. People are playing within the rules... the rules needs to be changed, lets blame the rule makers as much if not more than the "sandbaggers"
Since the MV/I team is the point of conversation, I'll use them as an example.
They really have the best of both worlds when you look at it from an associations position.
As an association you get to rack up wins, which keeps people motivated and coming back, AND be able to play some of the best AA teams in the state in tournaments and through normal scheduling.
If B teams can't skate up to A, then A teams shouldn't be allowed to skate up to AA. This might make associations think twice about declaring an association with 6 PW teams at the A level for their top team. Im guessing some parents of top players would want their kids playing against the best out there, not just most associations 15-30.
When my son started playing hockey 9 years ago, I predicted that in 20 years association hockey would be a thing of the past. While it might not happen in the next 11 years, it is going that way. MN hockey needs to realize this AA/A was a complete failure and readjust quickly before more harm is done to what was at one time the blueprint for the country when it came to youth hockey.
Haven't given out the Bo lightbulb in a while...
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
No, it's not normal in the rest of the state but it makes a lot of sense in Disrict 16. There are a lot of smaller, rural type Associations in that District. Some of them are trying to build A programs for the first time so they are wisely allowed to have some B teams on their schedule to give them some competitive games.Cobber wrote:District 16 has teams that do not have a A or AA teams and play in the B1 division for playoffs and play some A teams during the year is that normal for the rest of the state.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:25 pm
I agree. Especially when you consider that in your average association, an "A" level player typically has a very good chance of playing high school hockey.Eagles93 wrote:Edina is EXTREMELY guilty of this, particularly at the PeeWee and Bantam B1/B2 levels. They dominate these levels every year and they nor D6 does anything to correct. Having seen these teams, they have some players playing easily 2 levels too low. I don't know why Edina parents put up with this and don't demand change. I wouldn't want my kid that's an A level player playing B2.nobody wrote:Everyone likes to pick on Edina...and at times they were extremely guilty.
So lets look at D6
Standings:http://www.d6hockey.net/page/show/92541-standings
Expected to by tops Edina, compared to New Prague, standings don't lie..
I scrolled down as far as 10UA and realized it was insane.
NP
12UA 0 wins 8 goals on the season?
10UA 0 wins 4 goals on the season?
No 10u or 12u b teams...HOW could anyone do that in a sane world? That must be a fun year....How could anyone be that far off?
The same thing runs thru the boys teams, almost as bad. The majority of teams are winless in D6. Who are the parity police?
On the financial side, Edina B teams get free games at the expense of other associations in district playoffs. Edina teams will play 3-5 district playoff games while the New Prague/Waconia/Shakopee teams are lucky to play 2 games.
This could all easily be "fixed" with solutions like proposed above. Some type of percentile chart that associations look at and know which level their teams will be at based on numbers. Only exception would be an association opting UP for certain levels, not DOWN.
Regarding New Prague girls... they had a 10UB team last year, no 10UA. They went 15-1 and won district playoffs. Their only loss was to Waconia, who also had no A team and went 16-0. It's tough when you only have enough players for one team, there's a large difference between 10UA and 10UB.
I often wonder what its like to be one of these "B2" kids in Edina knowing that I have almost zero chance of playing varsity. Are they content to just beat up on on smaller schools and then call it a career after bantams?