what was the best Moorhead team to lose a Championship game

cloquetfan16
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:22 pm

what was the best Moorhead team to lose a Championship game

Post by cloquetfan16 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:33 am

was it this year ? <p></p><i></i>

Hillfan
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 11:48 pm

Re: what was the best Moorhead team to lose a Championship g

Post by Hillfan » Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:47 am

Moorhead had one solid club last year. But looking at this year with so much talent and so many seniors, it could have been this team. <p></p><i></i>

topshelf11
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:58 am

Re: what was the best Moorhead team to lose a Championship g

Post by topshelf11 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:29 am

This years team was the best. <p></p><i></i>

MightySpud03
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 5:12 am

Re: what was the best Moorhead team to lose a Championship g

Post by MightySpud03 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:21 am

After watching numerous teams in the past, I'd have to say this year's team was probably the best also <p></p><i></i>

BELOW 0 ZERO
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:51 am

it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by BELOW 0 ZERO » Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:34 am

the 1994 team would beg to differ. only time will tell, but since this year is viewed as one of the greatest chokes, this side of the pecos river, the '94 team could be construed as the best their's ever been. no team from moorhead ever, ever, ever scored more goals than the '94 team.<br><br>however, no team from moorhead ever, ever, ever choked as much as this years team: an overwhelming favorite.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... rassed.gif ALT=":o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

Seniornuts
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 10:05 pm

Re: it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by Seniornuts » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:07 am

To me being runner up is still top cheese compared to many that didnt make it there or have never won.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

EREmpireStrikesBack
Posts: 5137
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 10:28 am
Location: Minnesota

Re: it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by EREmpireStrikesBack » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:12 am

I'd say this year's team. #1 all year, only losses to good teams and ties THE GREATEST TEAM EVER* (* because of A haha <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :p --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... tongue.gif ALT=":p"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ). <p>Elk River AA State Champions- 2001 Boys & 2004 Girls</p><i></i>

THE SWAMP
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:05 am

Re: it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by THE SWAMP » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:21 am

Did ya know the Scheel's in Moorhead was selling t-shirts and stuff about Moorhead winning the state championship? Even Before the tournament. <p></p><i></i>

starsalum
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:51 am

Re: it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by starsalum » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:22 am

Yep <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="color:yellow;"><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Go Buffs</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></span><!--EZCODE FONT END--></p><i></i>

SpudsPUCKemUP
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 6:33 am

Re: it's between 1994 and 2005

Post by SpudsPUCKemUP » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:35 am

They had 2 designs of what the shirts looked like. Oh no a whole 15 bucks lost to the owner is a millionaire. <p></p><i></i>

LloydBraun
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 11:49 pm

big deal

Post by LloydBraun » Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:31 am

Big deal a place had a design for a shirt if moorehead won it. thats good business get it ready to sell right away if moorehead wins, companies do this all the time spending money to make clothes for both teams even before they know who won, stop trying to rub in the fact that moorehead lost geez it gets old <p></p><i></i>

icedreamer11
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:46 pm

Re: big deal

Post by icedreamer11 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:16 pm

1992-1994 teams would have beat this year's head-to-head. <p></p><i></i>

slapshooter
Posts: 4100
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 7:30 pm

'92 to '94 say no more!.....by SS

Post by slapshooter » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:27 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>1992 through 1994 !</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Like the man said so say no more!</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>S<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START 8o --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/nerd.gif ALT="8o"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> S</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <p></p><i></i>

BELOW 0 ZERO
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:51 am

beerhead sputternicks

Post by BELOW 0 ZERO » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:33 pm

with the way those goalies played in the championship. monticello would have beaten the 2005 team at that point.<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

packerboy
Posts: 5262
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 5:51 pm

Best is relative

Post by packerboy » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:58 pm

I dont know if the 90s team had more talent or not but what I do know is that ,all things considered ,this team had the best chance to win. <br><br>There was a team dressed in powder blue that had one or two decent players that blocked the path in the early 90s.<br><br>There was no such obstruction this year. Not on that scale.<br><br>Every thing was in their favor. They had the best team. No one in the section to keep them out. No super team in the field. DE knocks off WBL in the first round to give them an easy ride to the championship game. <br><br>I dont know if this was their best team but theyll never have a better opportunity to win it. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... ckerboy</A> at: 3/9/05 1:05 pm<br></i>

icedreamer11
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:46 pm

Re: Best is relative

Post by icedreamer11 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:38 pm

I agree with you 100% Packer, this was the ripest pickings for the Spuds ever. The powder Blue you speak of might have been the best High School Team in MN History. <p></p><i></i>

Neutron 14
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:48 pm

Re: Best is relative

Post by Neutron 14 » Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:38 pm

I think last years team was better than this years. More talent this year, but a lot less chemistry. I think last years Centennial team(30-1, 255 GF / 33 GA) was the best in MN since the Jefferson powerhouse's of the early 90's. Moorhead played them twice last year, I was at both, and it was an even match. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... 14>Neutron 14</A> at: 3/9/05 11:08 am<br></i>

reddy44
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:51 pm

Re: Best is relative

Post by reddy44 » Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:00 pm

Great point Packer I was thinking the same thing. The talent this team has is very comparible to the talent they had from 92-95. However, we are not talking about which team had the most talent, we are talking about the best team. There is no doubt if you compare the teams in the mid 90's to this years team there is one glaring difference. TEAM CHEMISTRY!!! They simply had better chemistry back then and a better man behind the bench. The best players were on the ice and everyone knew their place... <p></p><i></i>

Fives
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:25 am

Spuds

Post by Fives » Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:00 pm

I believe if this years team had TC coaching they would have won it. He would have had more discipline and they would have had a better work ethic.<br>I believe the 93-94 spuds power play ran at an amazing 52%.<br>Give that to this years team and they win it.<br>Still frustrated they couldn't win the big one this year. It would have got the monkey off the back for everyone who ever played for MHD. <p></p><i></i>

mnhockeylvr
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2002 8:40 pm

Re: Spuds

Post by mnhockeylvr » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:20 am

Ive still got to believe that the 94 team with Ryan Kraft and Matt Cullen among others had to be the team with the most sheer talent in Moorhead's history. And they were never higher than #2 or 3 in the state, pulling off an upset against Elk River in a section final. This team was better compared to the field, but I like the 94 team as my favorite Moorhead squad.<br><br>If only Beiswinger could have been playing this year, working that magic in stopping all of those shots, oh what could have been. <p></p><i></i>

carpenter guy
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:04 pm

Re: Spuds

Post by carpenter guy » Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:26 am

Last year's team was their best but they were unlucky to play against a nearly unbeatable Centennial team. <p></p><i></i>

cuda701
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 5:03 am

Re: Spuds

Post by cuda701 » Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:40 am

when herb brooks put together the '80 olympic team - what was the #1 thing he was looking for??????????<br><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"team chemistry"</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>this was the Spuds year as for talent<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p074.ezboard.com/bmnhs.showUserP ... cuda701</A> at: 3/10/05 10:41 pm<br></i>

icedreamer11
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:46 pm

Re: Spuds

Post by icedreamer11 » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:09 pm

92-94 would have beat this team head-to-head<br> <p></p><i></i>

Neutron 14
Posts: 5344
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:48 pm

Re: Spuds

Post by Neutron 14 » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:21 pm

I agree dreamer, but in a relative sense. Hockey talent in this state as a whole has grown immensely in the last 10 years. <p></p><i></i>

icedreamer11
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:46 pm

Re: Spuds

Post by icedreamer11 » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:51 pm

I can add to that good opinion by stating I think there was more parity in the top 5 teams this year than any other year that I can remember. <p></p><i></i>

Locked