State Seeding
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am
State Seeding
In one sentence please tell me what the advantage or disadvantage would be using a seeding system for the state tourny? Support your Vote! I really would like to see peoples comments. Lets keep this short and to the point!
Last edited by THEGunslinger on Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: A little bit south of Saskatoon.
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am
-
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Section 3 has your back, Cinderella!
Give the top seeds in Section 3 a second chance through Sections 7 & 8; then seed the State Tourney so that WBL, Roseville, Stillwater, or Centennial don't have to meet Hill-Murray in the first round; next, spread the four Catholic teams out, too (one Catholic squad for each first round game would assure a GOOD FRIDAY of semifinals).
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Not sure, that would've taken more than one sentence. Maybe they could plainly use record, or have a ranking system like PS2. Not saying that it's not great, but they could do whatever it would take to make it better. No system is perfect, but then there would be no human element. Or they could just have all the coaches vote for the teams that aren't theirs, 1-7, team with lowest is #1 and so on. There could be some bias, but I really don't think there would be that much.
Maybe they could discuss the teams first and someone could look over the votes. If six people put one team at #1 and then the 7AA and 8AA coaches put them at #6, let's talk to them about it, or something of that sort. But realistically, do people really think that would happen?
Maybe they could discuss the teams first and someone could look over the votes. If six people put one team at #1 and then the 7AA and 8AA coaches put them at #6, let's talk to them about it, or something of that sort. But realistically, do people really think that would happen?
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: A little bit south of Saskatoon.
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: St. Schmo
2004
In 2004, State Ranked #1 Warroad lost in overtime to the eventual state runner-up in the first round. Then they routed St. Cloud Cathedral and Albert Lea. Seeding would keep consolation brackets competitive, IMO.
"they are LAME" -darkdemon on SJU hockey
We can all give examples of why its a good idea as thruout the years matchups have occurred in the quarters and the semis that were billed as ' the real championship game' but I think that the opposition against seeding based on 'the coaches will be bias' and other such reasons is not well founded because the seeding process is not scientific and if thats a real concern, we shouldnt seed the sections or the NCAA tournamnet or anything else but we do because even a seeding that isnt perfect is better than none at all and if we needed to we could use HAL but I can see how people would be opposed to it because it really 'doesnt capture the spirit of the thing' because the State Tournament is about teams playing other teams from different parts of the state and not necessarily the best vs the best but since so much emphasis is placed on the championship it should be seeded like every other big thing is and I think Sister Mary Rose would wack me with a ruler for this run on sentence but at least Gunslinger cant yell at me.
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: A little bit south of Saskatoon.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
I liked the sentence.
So, what's the point of the state tournament? It's not to see who's the best team in state? Really? It's actually to get teams from different parts of the state to play each other? Shouldn't it be more of a round robin then? Or, even if it doesn't work out then the teams that aren't within a certain distance of each other who didn't play each other have to? But just for fun.
I could've sworn it was actually to crown the team who does the best post-season, but while doing our best to get teams from all over.
So, what's the point of the state tournament? It's not to see who's the best team in state? Really? It's actually to get teams from different parts of the state to play each other? Shouldn't it be more of a round robin then? Or, even if it doesn't work out then the teams that aren't within a certain distance of each other who didn't play each other have to? But just for fun.
I could've sworn it was actually to crown the team who does the best post-season, but while doing our best to get teams from all over.
packerboy
packerboy wrote:We can all give examples of why its a good idea as thruout the years matchups have occurred in the quarters and the semis that were billed as ' the real championship game' but I think that the opposition against seeding based on 'the coaches will be bias' and other such reasons is not well founded because the seeding process is not scientific and if thats a real concern, we shouldnt seed the sections or the NCAA tournamnet or anything else but we do because even a seeding that isnt perfect is better than none at all and if we needed to we could use HAL but I can see how people would be opposed to it because it really 'doesnt capture the spirit of the thing' because the State Tournament is about teams playing other teams from different parts of the state and not necessarily the best vs the best but since so much emphasis is placed on the championship it should be seeded like every other big thing is and I think Sister Mary Rose would wack me with a ruler for this run on sentence but at least Gunslinger cant yell at me.
What he said
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
Re: packerboy
Sparlimb wrote:packerboy wrote:We can all give examples of why its a good idea as thruout the years matchups have occurred in the quarters and the semis that were billed as ' the real championship game' but I think that the opposition against seeding based on 'the coaches will be bias' and other such reasons is not well founded because the seeding process is not scientific and if thats a real concern, we shouldnt seed the sections or the NCAA tournamnet or anything else but we do because even a seeding that isnt perfect is better than none at all and if we needed to we could use HAL but I can see how people would be opposed to it because it really 'doesnt capture the spirit of the thing' because the State Tournament is about teams playing other teams from different parts of the state and not necessarily the best vs the best but since so much emphasis is placed on the championship it should be seeded like every other big thing is and I think Sister Mary Rose would wack me with a ruler for this run on sentence but at least Gunslinger cant yell at me.
What he said
What Sparlim said, and anything that screws the northern schools and assures an all metro final, works for me...
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
If it's about many things, other than crowning the team that happens to do the best in the final 64 team bracket, let us hear it, don't just say it is.
The Wisconsin State tournament is a perfect example of where seeding is not needed, kinda of like our football tournaments. They have just the main bracket, not even a third place game. It doesn't make sense, IMO, to not seed, then to have a consolation bracket. The winner of that could be the 2nd best team, or the 6th best team, depending on how things land. If there is just the main bracket all your are playing for is the State Championship, so no need for seeding, the only guy to be acknowledged is the guy (or team) who didn't lose.
But if you're going to have a consolation bracket and basically play things out, you should seed. Or have a system from throughout the year of earning your spot.
The Wisconsin State tournament is a perfect example of where seeding is not needed, kinda of like our football tournaments. They have just the main bracket, not even a third place game. It doesn't make sense, IMO, to not seed, then to have a consolation bracket. The winner of that could be the 2nd best team, or the 6th best team, depending on how things land. If there is just the main bracket all your are playing for is the State Championship, so no need for seeding, the only guy to be acknowledged is the guy (or team) who didn't lose.
But if you're going to have a consolation bracket and basically play things out, you should seed. Or have a system from throughout the year of earning your spot.
Well HS, I am sure you have noticed that the sections are predetermined so that no matter who might be the top 2 teams they can be in the same section so that only one even makes the final 8.
In tournaments such as the NCAA, they put teams in sections(regions) at the end of the season based on percieved strength , distributing the best teams so that they dont play each other until the final four, barring upsets.
The MSHSL has never claimed that its year end tournament consists of the best 8 teams in the state. Its the 8 section champs.
It used to be the region champs but they did away with that as the sections are more of an attempt to be competitively balanced but still, Roseville will not be sent to section 8 or 7 at the end of this year to even things out like a Midwest team might be sent to the West Regional in the NCAA and lose to a Catholic team from the East coast. .
It is the goal of the MSHSL to have competitive teams from all over the state participate. They dont care if the best teams are there and they certainly have never cared if the 2 best teams play each other in the quaters.
So, thats why I raise the question of whether seeding is within the spirit of the thing.
In tournaments such as the NCAA, they put teams in sections(regions) at the end of the season based on percieved strength , distributing the best teams so that they dont play each other until the final four, barring upsets.
The MSHSL has never claimed that its year end tournament consists of the best 8 teams in the state. Its the 8 section champs.
It used to be the region champs but they did away with that as the sections are more of an attempt to be competitively balanced but still, Roseville will not be sent to section 8 or 7 at the end of this year to even things out like a Midwest team might be sent to the West Regional in the NCAA and lose to a Catholic team from the East coast. .
It is the goal of the MSHSL to have competitive teams from all over the state participate. They dont care if the best teams are there and they certainly have never cared if the 2 best teams play each other in the quaters.
So, thats why I raise the question of whether seeding is within the spirit of the thing.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 am