Little Falls...easiest schedule in state??
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Re: Little Falls...easiest schedule in state??
I think this is a stupid thread. But no, they don'tnhl06 wrote:What does everyone think??
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:51 pm
easy schedule?
Obviously they have a weak schedule that could have probably been a bit tougher, but look at the history of the program. It is not that easy to get quality teams to play you when you just get your program started in the right direction for a few years. You also have to look to the future and you would probably see that in a few years they will fall back down to the bottom for a few years. Why is everyone so involved with this schedule anyway, it is only hurting themselves. To those who doubt the skill of this team, you will most likely not change your minds unless they win the state title so you will have to go watch them play yourselves. Obviously they live and die with the top guns of festler and both hanowski's, but they have some quality role players as well and have a chance to at least make some more noise this year at state (if they get there).
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:18 pm
- Location: Delano, MN
Re: Little Falls...easiest schedule in state??
They may not have the easiest schedule in the state. But they do have the easiest schedule of any team that will be going to the state tourney.boblee wrote:I think this is a stupid thread. But no, they don'tnhl06 wrote:What does everyone think??
Re: Little Falls...easiest schedule in state??
I agree with that, yes.Wild4hockey wrote:They may not have the easiest schedule in the state. But they do have the easiest schedule of any team that will be going to the state tourney.boblee wrote:I think this is a stupid thread. But no, they don'tnhl06 wrote:What does everyone think??
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7270
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:51 pm
Section 4A and 1A have maybe a couple teams that can compete at a high lever, and its not their fault they have a weaker schedule. I know that Coach Couture would prefer a tougher schedule... but it is nice having 20 win seasons every year. But the main question here involves whether the Flyers are truly ready for the State Tourney come March, given their weaker schedule??
That has recently been a "No"the walk-on wrote:Section 4A and 1A have maybe a couple teams that can compete at a high lever, and its not their fault they have a weaker schedule. I know that Coach Couture would prefer a tougher schedule... but it is nice having 20 win seasons every year. But the main question here involves whether the Flyers are truly ready for the State Tourney come March, given their weaker schedule??
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7270
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Just posted it.boblee wrote:Certainly. We are nearing the 1st of the year.east hockey wrote:Easier than the representative of Section 1A? That's worth researching. Come to think of it, it's likely time to do the first Strength Of Schedule updates on minnhock.com.STC18 wrote:Agreed on that one.
Lee
Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
Egomaniac since 2006
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:37 pm
If Marshall (they gotta be hurtin' East) and St Cloud Cathedral got bumped to Class AA (where they belong) and disperse the rest of 2A between 4A & 1A, then add a back door and we might get two good teams out of three down to the Xeast hockey wrote:Easier than the representative of Section 1A?
Lee
Or, stick St. Cloud Cathedral into 4A and we could get one more private school into the Class A tourny
Syd
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: On Da Stares!
I wanna see this strength of schedule thing
Where? I looked on your site, can't find it. Is Mo Stupid?east hockey wrote:
Just posted it.
Lee
Re: I wanna see this strength of schedule thing
yes he is...Morris Wanchuk wrote:Where? I looked on your site, can't find it. Is Mo Stupid?east hockey wrote:
Just posted it.
Lee
http://www.minnhock.com/strength.htm
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: On Da Stares!
Re: I wanna see this strength of schedule thing
yes he is...boblee wrote:
Where? I looked on your site, can't find it. Is Mo Stupid?
Oh you hurt Mo's feelings you big thugboy. What you gonna do next?
Re: I wanna see this strength of schedule thing
It's alright Mo. I was just messin' around. And apparently Little Falls only plays the 80th most difficult schedule. Not number 153.Morris Wanchuk wrote:yes he is...boblee wrote:
Where? I looked on your site, can't find it. Is Mo Stupid?
Oh you hurt Mo's feelings you big thugboy. What you gonna do next?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7270
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Re: I wanna see this strength of schedule thing
Well, you asked the question.Morris Wanchuk wrote:yes he is...boblee wrote:
Where? I looked on your site, can't find it. Is Mo Stupid?
Oh you hurt Mo's feelings you big thugboy. What you gonna do next?
Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
Egomaniac since 2006
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:37 pm
No need to thank me. Everyone should be thanking Lee.Syd Barrett wrote:Minnesota High School Boys' Hockey
Schedule Strength
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teams Rated by Strength of Schedule (PageStat2)
RANK TEAM AVG
#80 LITTLE FALLS 16.22
Nuff said
Thanks bob-a-lewee
Syd
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: On Da Stares!
tic-tac-DUH
It wasn't in the form of a poll though....Well, you asked the question
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7270
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Re: tic-tac-DUH
Heh heh...as admin, I could always edit the original post and put one in there. Nah, that's the type of post I'd nuke if I saw someone else do it.Morris Wanchuk wrote:It wasn't in the form of a poll though....Well, you asked the question
Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
Egomaniac since 2006
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:48 am
- Location: On Da Stares!
bows to the king
Thanks (again) LEE! Even though I would prolly vote for mahself bein stupid as I still can't find it on your site.
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:37 pm
Re: bows to the king
Morris Wanchuk wrote:Thanks (again) LEE! Even though I would prolly vote for mahself bein stupid as I still can't find it on your site.
Eh Morrie, it looks like you got the knee pads on
Syd
Re: bows to the king
He posted all the ratings in another topic, heres the link:Morris Wanchuk wrote:Thanks (again) LEE! Even though I would prolly vote for mahself bein stupid as I still can't find it on your site.
http://www.ushsho.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8971