Section 2A Predictions

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:09 am

hockeylegit099 wrote:HF 4 Providence 2 kind of a sloppy game HF goalie played very well HF definetly won with ease

Atta boy Laprade! Keep up the good work!

MNHocker444 · Post by **MNHocker444** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:09 am

Does not matter HF will get smoked next round by blake thats a guarantee.

hogan4arules · Post by **hogan4arules** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:21 am

Hf will give Blake a run, but Blake has too much speed for HF to handle and the HF goalie is shaky at best. Look for a Breck beating Blake Final.

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:09 am

hogan4arules wrote:Hf will give Blake a run, but Blake has too much speed for HF to handle and the HF goalie is shaky at best. Look for a Breck beating Blake Final.

Doesnt Blake play Richfield first?

DENIED · Post by **DENIED** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:27 am

Josh Birkholz could beat Richfield all by himself!
I'm sure Blake is not worried about what the mighty SPARTANS have to offer!

Breck might also be having nightmares about STMA, NOT!
Should be a couple barn burners at Parade tonight.

hockeyrocks · Post by **hockeyrocks** » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:44 am

DENIED wrote:Josh Birkholz could beat Richfield all by himself!
I'm sure Blake is not worried about what the mighty SPARTANS have to offer!
Breck might also be having nightmares about STMA, NOT!
Should be a couple barn burners at Parade tonight.

While he probably could, its a team game, and the team has lost a couple of head scratchers, as has Breck. Thats what makes this so fun!

My prediction;

Blake wins by 4 and Breck by 3.

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:23 am

hockeyrocks wrote:
DENIED wrote:Josh Birkholz could beat Richfield all by himself!
I'm sure Blake is not worried about what the mighty SPARTANS have to offer!
Breck might also be having nightmares about STMA, NOT!
Should be a couple barn burners at Parade tonight.
While he probably could, its a team game, and the team has lost a couple of head scratchers, as has Breck. Thats what makes this so fun!

My prediction;

Blake wins by 4 and Breck by 3.

Not bad but it was the other way arround. Blake by 3 and Breck by 4

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:54 am

My predictions

Holy Family- 4
Blake- 5
in o.t.
Holy Family will come very close to an upset (I'm guessing a disallowed goal in o.t. for H.F. leads to a Blake win)

Breck- 5
Mound- 2

Neson hasn't played well lately...

MNHocker444 · Post by **MNHocker444** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:22 pm

Blake 7
HF 2

Breck 10
Mound 3
yes, 10-3. If an average Orono team can score 9* goals on mound, breck will score 10+. Nelson has been absolutely awful as of late, and he is lucky they waved off 4 goals against orono. The high sticking waved off goal against orono is the only one that should have been waved off.

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:53 pm

MNHocker444 wrote:Blake 7
HF 2

Breck 10
Mound 3
yes, 10-3. If an average Orono team can score 9* goals on mound, breck will score 10+. Nelson has been absolutely awful as of late, and he is lucky they waved off 4 goals against orono. The high sticking waved off goal against orono is the only one that should have been waved off.

I guess... it COULD happen...

Goldy23 · Post by **Goldy23** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:51 pm

fivehole628 wrote:
MNHocker444 wrote:Blake 7
HF 2

Breck 10
Mound 3
yes, 10-3. If an average Orono team can score 9* goals on mound, breck will score 10+. Nelson has been absolutely awful as of late, and he is lucky they waved off 4 goals against orono. The high sticking waved off goal against orono is the only one that should have been waved off.
I guess... it COULD happen...

I think Breck will win and hope to see a Blake/Breck rematch, but Mound is to good to be blown out. I'd say 5-3 Breck.

pucky-duck · Post by **pucky-duck** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:24 pm

The Blake fwds better keep their heads up Tuesday night. HF's Earls pummelled a couple of Providence kids who tried to break out of the zone with their heads down or looking back. I'm not saying the hits were dirty they were about as hard a hits as I've seen and that's all he's really looking to do on the ice. Especially early in the game.

Be warned!

Goldy23 · Post by **Goldy23** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:00 pm

pucky-duck wrote:The Blake fwds better keep their heads up Tuesday night. HF's Earls pummelled a couple of Providence kids who tried to break out of the zone with their heads down or looking back. I'm not saying the hits were dirty they were about as hard a hits as I've seen and that's all he's really looking to do on the ice. Especially early in the game.

Be warned!

Saw that. He is an animal!

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:02 pm

Goldy23 wrote:
pucky-duck wrote:The Blake fwds better keep their heads up Tuesday night. HF's Earls pummelled a couple of Providence kids who tried to break out of the zone with their heads down or looking back. I'm not saying the hits were dirty they were about as hard a hits as I've seen and that's all he's really looking to do on the ice. Especially early in the game.

Be warned!
Saw that. He is an animal!

Yep. Sees the ice well. Smart kid. Passes with a soft touch.

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:00 pm

flatontheice wrote:
Goldy23 wrote:
pucky-duck wrote:The Blake fwds better keep their heads up Tuesday night. HF's Earls pummelled a couple of Providence kids who tried to break out of the zone with their heads down or looking back. I'm not saying the hits were dirty they were about as hard a hits as I've seen and that's all he's really looking to do on the ice. Especially early in the game.

Be warned!
Saw that. He is an animal!
Yep. Sees the ice well. Smart kid. Passes with a soft touch.

I hope your joking

pucky-duck · Post by **pucky-duck** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 9:25 pm

fivehole628 wrote:
flatontheice wrote:
Goldy23 wrote: Saw that. He is an animal!
Yep. Sees the ice well. Smart kid. Passes with a soft touch.
I hope your joking

Don't worry Fiver, he was - check the rolling eyes Emoticon!

Are you going to play somewhere next year or are you back @ D-land?

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:08 pm

Haha if I play like I did against STMA, I aint going NOWHERE for hockey!! I'm a senior though... so i'm outta D-Town.

Mnh0ckey · Post by **Mnh0ckey** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:06 am

Good luck to the remaining teams in sections. I hope whoever comes out of 2A represents the section well.

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:50 pm

Mnh0ckey wrote:
fivehole628 wrote:Haha if I play like I did against STMA, I aint going NOWHERE for hockey!! I'm a senior though... so i'm outta D-Town.
You keep trashing STMA. You were cleary smoked on the winning goal and had no chance. If you would like to see it for yourself, you can visit Channel 5 sportswrap page and watch Sportswrap online about the middle of the page. Just wait and it will start playing for you. Slide the play arrow over to about 14:30 and watch from there. YOU HAD NO CHANCE!

http://kstp.com/article/78//

And STMA played a great game against an exceptional team in Breck. They do have some players with talent on the team that can score. It was 3-2 1/4 of the way through the 3rd until STMA flat out ran out of gas and against a team like Breck, they will make you pay. I wish Breck and the rest of the teams that are still alive good luck in the rest of their sectional play. And I hope whoever comes out of the section, represents section 2A well at state.

I dont understand... was that a diss at me?

ovechkinrules · Post by **ovechkinrules** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:17 pm

i thought it was a diss, your dissing how bad STMA is and you got 5 goals scored against you by the Knights. you just jumped out of the net and didn't have a shot of making the save.

toptitter · Post by **toptitter** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:22 pm

well both delano and stma are bad... but stma won but i think fivehole had a bad game and the stma goalie had a good game didnt he have like 60 some saves??

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:41 am

ovechkinrules wrote:i thought it was a diss, your dissing how bad STMA is and you got 5 goals scored against you by the Knights. you just jumped out of the net and didn't have a shot of making the save.

I never dissed STMA, actually I even said before the game that they could beat us. So I have no clue what your talking about...

pucky-duck · Post by **pucky-duck** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:39 pm

fivehole628 wrote:Haha if I play like I did against STMA, I aint going NOWHERE for hockey!! I'm a senior though... so i'm outta D-Town.

Hey Good luck Fiver - I like your style!

fivehole628 · Post by **fivehole628** » Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:27 am

Thanks...

Breck-6
Mound-0

Blake-4
Holy Family-3

Tigers33 · Post by **Tigers33** » Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:54 am

I personally thought Breck was the best team on the ice last night. Blake is very lucky to get by Holy Family. I thought Holy Family was the better team throughout three periods of hockey. However, Holy Family began to look scared and tired in the third period.

Scenarion-1:50 left in the game and Holy Family begins a power play (which was really bad throughout the game). They pulled the goalie with about 1:30 left in the game for a 6 on 4 advantage. My question is, why was #10 not one of the 6 on the ice?

He had the strongest shot out of anyone out there and he would have been a perfect kid to put in front of the net to cause comotion. I didnt understand this decision.

Blake needs to play better if they think they are going to beat Breck. Breck looked extremely good, especially their depth. I have heard a lot of chatter about #6 from Breck, some defenseman. I think someone was comparing him to some of the best in the state and that he unfortunately gets overlooked. Here is my assessment of the kid, he is average at best. Yes, he did have a couple of assists but he never stood out in my eyes. Breck players that did stand out were #8, #21, and #23. I never saw #6 do anything special.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section 2A Predictions

Richfield ?

Re: Richfield ?

Re: Richfield ?

Re: Richfield ?

Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family

Re: Blake & Holy Family