AHA vs. WBL 12/30
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
AHA vs. WBL 12/30
Who is gonna take this one?
Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30
Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30
i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.BodyShots wrote:Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30
First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't gomnhcky65 wrote:i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.BodyShots wrote:Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30
oops sorry hausy is healthy, its dolfay that is out. but w/o Gjerde and Dolfay playing its 2 good defenders gone.TheNightman wrote:First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't gomnhcky65 wrote:i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.BodyShots wrote: Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.
I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:57 pm
Stars are on a roll; I'm betting its gonna be a close, well-played game.
AHA 3
WBL 2
AHA 3
WBL 2

Last edited by FightingSiouxForever on Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: Right behind you!
-
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:58 pm
- Location: Land of 10,000 Rinks
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:56 pm
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:23 pm
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:08 pm
i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
AHA 4
WBL 1
WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
-
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:27 pm
They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???mnhcky65 wrote:WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
Swanson and Wallin from WB also scored twice, Swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after one of his goals... Does that make those to as needed to be contained as Pitlick? Any playerr could have scored Pitlicks goals, not saying Owen is bad but every player should score on a breakaway.King of the Pond wrote:Swanson and Wallin also got 2 goals, swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after his goal... does that just make them as good as Pitlick? and yes they contianed him most of the game except for his two breakaways.mnhcky65 wrote:WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???
Last edited by mnhcky65 on Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am
they were outplayed late in the third like they almost always are due to no depth on defense. other than that they did just fine. Gjerde still isnt certain, the big guy wants to play but he suffered a concussion yesterday and probably wont be goin today. as for wolters, if he can get his doctors note in he said he will probably be playing today. and no one noticed that(pardon the bad spelling)lennartson was out yesterday(cause of his penalty aainst hill)and will also be back today. so hopfully the bears can keep up with AHA and if Owen can have a good game I think WB can go to the ship to meet Edina.King of the Pond wrote:They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???mnhcky65 wrote:WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
WB-4
AHA-2
Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am
yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happenBodyShots wrote:Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
I'm sure if Sager would have kept strong the whole game, White Bear would have finished with two hat tricks.blanco oso wrote:yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happenBodyShots wrote:Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.
AHA 4
WBL 1
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:17 pm
- Location: Right behind you!
Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?mnhcky65 wrote:White Bear has way better chance than that.TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
WB- 3
AHA- 2
STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am
last time i checked, centennial was #4 in state, and undefeated. and whens the last time you saw WB play STA or AHA?and yes i think 6-2 is a very unreasonable prediction...i mean really...we will see today but i dont think who ever wins will win by more than 2 goalsTheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?mnhcky65 wrote:White Bear has way better chance than that.TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
WB- 3
AHA- 2
STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?