AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Who is Going to the Ship?

AHA
20
57%
WBL
15
43%
 
Total votes: 35

mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Post by mnhcky65 »

Who is gonna take this one?
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Post by BodyShots »

mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Post by mnhcky65 »

BodyShots wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.
i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
TheNightman
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:41 pm

Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Post by TheNightman »

mnhcky65 wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:Who is gonna take this one?
Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.
i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't go
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Re: AHA vs. WBL 12/30

Post by mnhcky65 »

TheNightman wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:
BodyShots wrote: Not sure of the status of Gjerde. Take another D from the bears and it will be a tough ride. I think Hoffman and Putney played in excess of 30 minutes each with Hoffman playing the last 5 minutes of the Centennial game. It will be interesting to see how they recover.
i am not sure if he will be back but if he isnt they wont have Gjerede, Hauswirth, or Walters. Thats 2 good defenders.

I beleive AHA beat WB by a goal in a srimmage earlier this season
First of all it's Wolter, and second of all neither Wolter or Hauswirth plays defense. But I agree it will be tough if Gjerde can't go
oops sorry hausy is healthy, its dolfay that is out. but w/o Gjerde and Dolfay playing its 2 good defenders gone.
specialblend
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm

Post by specialblend »

If the Bears can pick up the slack on defense and stay outta the box, I wouldn't count them out of this one.
FightingSiouxForever
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:57 pm

Post by FightingSiouxForever »

Stars are on a roll; I'm betting its gonna be a close, well-played game.
AHA 3
WBL 2 :o
Last edited by FightingSiouxForever on Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TheMeanRichJokeMan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: Right behind you!

Post by TheMeanRichJokeMan »

Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
Zamman
Posts: 2106
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 1:15 pm
Location: Edina

Post by Zamman »

I agree, STARS roll win 5 -2. WBL looked good against Centennial, but not as good as STA.
MNsGreatest#2
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:58 pm
Location: Land of 10,000 Rinks

Post by MNsGreatest#2 »

AHA 4-1. WBL snuck through Centennial due to poor performance in the paint by Larson. Danny dangles and snipes for two to lead the Angels to the ship.
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2
greyhoundsnation27
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:56 pm

Post by greyhoundsnation27 »

From what I've seen of White Bear this year, I think they have the talent to play with any team in the state. The problem is that they haven't shown that they can play hard for an entire game yet. I'll take Holy Angels 5-2.
hockeyxfan01
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm

Post by hockeyxfan01 »

White Bear will have to be on their game as far as defense and goaltending, especially with 2 defenders injured, but I think they can pull it off.

WBL 4
AHA 3
Mr.Penalty
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:23 pm

Post by Mr.Penalty »

as from what i know...casey gjerde just got shookin' up a little and will be ready to go for their game against AHA.
StateofHockeyFan
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:08 pm

Post by StateofHockeyFan »

i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.
King of the Pond
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:27 pm

Post by King of the Pond »

mnhcky65 wrote:
StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.
They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

King of the Pond wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:
StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.
Swanson and Wallin also got 2 goals, swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after his goal... does that just make them as good as Pitlick? and yes they contianed him most of the game except for his two breakaways.

They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???
Swanson and Wallin from WB also scored twice, Swanson also with an assist 8 seconds after one of his goals... Does that make those to as needed to be contained as Pitlick? Any playerr could have scored Pitlicks goals, not saying Owen is bad but every player should score on a breakaway.
Last edited by mnhcky65 on Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
blanco oso
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am

Post by blanco oso »

King of the Pond wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:
StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
WB didnt get out played, they completely dominated until the cheap shot that put them down their second defender. With Gjerde playing WB has a great chance at this if they can contain Mattson like they contained Pitlick.
They were outplayed in the first and third periods, they got a flurry of sloppy goals in the second. And i guess you consider 2 goals by a player being contained???
they were outplayed late in the third like they almost always are due to no depth on defense. other than that they did just fine. Gjerde still isnt certain, the big guy wants to play but he suffered a concussion yesterday and probably wont be goin today. as for wolters, if he can get his doctors note in he said he will probably be playing today. and no one noticed that(pardon the bad spelling)lennartson was out yesterday(cause of his penalty aainst hill)and will also be back today. so hopfully the bears can keep up with AHA and if Owen can have a good game I think WB can go to the ship to meet Edina.
WB-4
AHA-2
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.
blanco oso
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am

Post by blanco oso »

BodyShots wrote:
StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.
yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happen
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

blanco oso wrote:
BodyShots wrote:
StateofHockeyFan wrote:i didnt think WBL had a chance against centennial. i was clearly wrong, but they were outplayed and got away with some lucky goals. WBL is going to have their hands full with mattson just like they did with pitlick. but i dont think that they are going to be as fortunate with the goals scored verse AHA.

AHA 4
WBL 1
Where does that line come from? Centennial was up 9-1 in shots early in the 1st period when WBL took over. WBL outplayed Centennial the rest of the first period and all of the second. Take Pitlicks two break away goals out of the equation and WBL dominated them for a period and a half. Then as usual, Sager plays his no forecheck, no pressure defense and lets the other team gain momentum and make a come back in the 3rd period. If he would let them skate the whole game, that might have been a double digit blow out for the bears.
yah no ish. pappa "body shots" here is right. sager put in the fourth liners, and no gjerde, and pulled a lets just finish the game and get some kids some playing time. if WB would have played the rest of the game like they were in the first 2 periods, centennial might have thrown some more cheap shots cause they were so mad...thank goodness that didnt happen
I'm sure if Sager would have kept strong the whole game, White Bear would have finished with two hat tricks.
TheMeanRichJokeMan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: Right behind you!

Post by TheMeanRichJokeMan »

mnhcky65 wrote:
TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2
Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?

STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?
carpenterguy
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:55 am

Post by carpenterguy »

AHA should roll.

WBL beat Centennial but Centennial is still the better team.

Today they beat STA 6-3 outshooting them 2-1 while being shorthanded numerous times.

Centennial would beat WBL 80% of the time, but just not yesterday.
blanco oso
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am

Post by blanco oso »

TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:
mnhcky65 wrote:
TheMeanRichJokeMan wrote:Holy Angels rolls 6-2.
White Bear has way better chance than that.

WB- 3
AHA- 2
Says who. Is there anthing you can base that on other than they got lucky against a decent (but not great) Centennial team?

STA is a far better team than White Bear and AHA rolled them by almost the same score. So is that really that unreasonable of an prediction?
last time i checked, centennial was #4 in state, and undefeated. and whens the last time you saw WB play STA or AHA?and yes i think 6-2 is a very unreasonable prediction...i mean really...we will see today but i dont think who ever wins will win by more than 2 goals
Post Reply