Page 5 of 5

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:59 pm
by sticksuphigh
The one that remains most private! Which also means the one we hear from the least......... :oops:

Re: Private School to the North

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:53 pm
by Goldy23
Topperhockey34 wrote:Well,

What about the private school to the North. The education is great, not as expensive as the southern schools. And lets mention the hockey team...in the past 10 years the team has turned for bad to a state contender each year.

Go Hilltoppers!!!
Topper,

No question they are a very good team the only problem is the drive to school would be a little long :D

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:08 pm
by Goldy23
flatontheice wrote:
pistol wrote:This is rapidly breaking down into the B-squad thread!
You guys may want to check your facts on where some of the most highly recruited Minnesota players have come from in recent years. Here is a hint:

Youso, Ballard, Oshie, Forney, Fulton, Sackrison, Niskanen, Wyman, Gordon, Pohl, and many many others. Calling A hockey the "B" Squad is a little much.
.....Wheeler, Mueller, Festler etc...

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:27 pm
by Reggie
Duluth East should be!

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:07 am
by packerboy
You can make as long a list as you like, Class A schools cant be considered the best. If Sidney Crosby had played at a Class A school, it wouldn't change a thing.

Class A schools have voluntarily disqualified themselves from consideration.

If they wanted to be considered with the best, play AA.

Its as simple as that.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:15 am
by windtomyback
Wow, interesting definition of best :?

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:22 am
by Goldy23
packerboy wrote:You can make as long a list as you like, Class A schools cant be considered the best. If Sidney Crosby had played at a Class A school, it wouldn't change a thing.

Class A schools have voluntarily disqualified themselves from consideration.

If they wanted to be considered with the best, play AA.

Its as simple as that.
I'm pretty sure the question was best private school, not best AA private school. But what do I know, after all I have a public school edumacation!!!

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:32 am
by Walter Sojack
Packerboy, lets stay away from Private vs Public, A vs AA. You should know that

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:23 pm
by 61ache
Isn't asking what private school the best like asking what venereal disease you'd most like to catch? IMHO they got it right when they banned them from the tourneys--everything that's wrong with HS hockey.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:32 pm
by Walter Sojack
Thats a ridiculous statement

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:48 pm
by packerboy
Walter Sojack wrote:Packerboy, lets stay away from Private vs Public, A vs AA. You should know that
IMO, which is hardly singular, you cant have a complete and meaningfull discussion about HS Hockey without it.

But that aside, you sure can't discuss the best without reference to what competitive level the schools athletic program is involved in.

I suppose if a school was so vastly superior in every other category, it could play in a lower athletic class (like Duluth East does in football)and still be the best.

But there is no such animal out there.

Therefore, regardless of the titile of the thread, Bsquad schools need not apply.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:04 pm
by windtomyback
Totino Grace seems to excel in a number of the athletic programs. Don't know how the school ranks academically.

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:44 pm
by pistol
61ache wrote:Isn't asking what private school the best like asking what venereal disease you'd most like to catch? IMHO they got it right when they banned them from the tourneys--everything that's wrong with HS hockey.
Welcome to the thread, Coach Oliver!

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:16 am
by mrhockey08
Im pretty sure that Private schools are Evil and the worst thing about HS sports.i often wonder how god feels about those schools :(

but i would say based off of tournament success The Academy Of Holy Angels Is the Cream of the Crop when it comes to private schools

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:17 am
by etune21
public schools like edina and roseau that dominate private schools day after day are the only thing that allows me to sleep at night. eff Holy angels, eff CDH, and most of all eff St. thomas

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:45 am
by hockeyrocks
etune21 wrote:public schools like edina and roseau that dominate private schools day after day are the only thing that allows me to sleep at night. eff Holy angels, eff CDH, and most of all eff St. thomas
We go from a somewhat intelligent thread about a legitimate question to out and out private school bashing. I love this game!!!!!

By the way, if Edina (who I unfortunately believe is the best team this year) dominates the private schools so much, why haven't they been to the State tourney as often as Hill, CDH, STA, AHA have been the past 10 years?

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:06 am
by hockeyrocks
Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
61ACHE,

I have to agree with Coffee Connoisseur on this one. What tourneys are you talking about them being banned from anyway? The "Frostbite Falls/Backbacon/Hoser Invitational" or the "Youbetcha/nine year old stained Polaris Jacket Jamboree?" :lol:

Last time I checked, they are still pretty regular attendees in St. Paul every year whether we like it or not.

__________________
I'm just finishing my lutefisk and elk meat jerky

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:13 am
by 61ache
hockeyrocks wrote:
Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
61ACHE,

I have to agree with Coffee Connoisseur on this one. What tourneys are you talking about them being banned from anyway? The "Frostbite Falls/Backbacon/Hoser Invitational" or the "Youbetcha/nine year old stained Polaris Jacket Jamboree?" :lol:

Last time I checked, they are still pretty regular attendees in St. Paul every year whether we like it or not.

__________________
I'm just finishing my lutefisk and elk meat jerky
What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:27 am
by flatontheice
61ache wrote:
hockeyrocks wrote:
Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
61ACHE,

I have to agree with Coffee Connoisseur on this one. What tourneys are you talking about them being banned from anyway? The "Frostbite Falls/Backbacon/Hoser Invitational" or the "Youbetcha/nine year old stained Polaris Jacket Jamboree?" :lol:

Last time I checked, they are still pretty regular attendees in St. Paul every year whether we like it or not.

__________________
I'm just finishing my lutefisk and elk meat jerky
What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.

Holding a grudge since 1975? Bummer that all those other kids get to play on a team? Come on. Pure ignorance. Free Enterprise! That is what your town was built on. Look arround.

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:16 am
by Walter Sojack
What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.
You should know better than to bring up a public vs. private debate - you're going to get this thread locked.

PS: I watch highschool hockey because I love the passion the kids put into the game. Not because good 'ol Roseau is winning. And I wouldn't stop watching if AHA and STA won state the next 5 years.

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:25 am
by packerboy
You are not alone Walt. 125,000 of your closest friends agree with you every March.

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:16 pm
by flatontheice
packerboy wrote:You are not alone Walt. 125,000 of your closest friends agree with you every March.
AMEN! (Can I say that?) :P

Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:43 pm
by east hockey
east hockey wrote:
Jbone wrote:How fun would it be if kids stayed where they came from. That would be Minnesota hockey at it's finest!
If this thread turns into yet another public vs. private topic, it gets locked, and any future topics which even smell of the same will be deleted as soon as they're started.

Just so you know.

Lee
I don't know if this was a self-fulfilling prophecy or just my experience of knowing how these threads turn out. Attaway, guys. :roll:

Lee