Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:59 pm
The one that remains most private! Which also means the one we hear from the least......... 

The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Topper,Topperhockey34 wrote:Well,
What about the private school to the North. The education is great, not as expensive as the southern schools. And lets mention the hockey team...in the past 10 years the team has turned for bad to a state contender each year.
Go Hilltoppers!!!
.....Wheeler, Mueller, Festler etc...flatontheice wrote:You guys may want to check your facts on where some of the most highly recruited Minnesota players have come from in recent years. Here is a hint:pistol wrote:This is rapidly breaking down into the B-squad thread!
Youso, Ballard, Oshie, Forney, Fulton, Sackrison, Niskanen, Wyman, Gordon, Pohl, and many many others. Calling A hockey the "B" Squad is a little much.
I'm pretty sure the question was best private school, not best AA private school. But what do I know, after all I have a public school edumacation!!!packerboy wrote:You can make as long a list as you like, Class A schools cant be considered the best. If Sidney Crosby had played at a Class A school, it wouldn't change a thing.
Class A schools have voluntarily disqualified themselves from consideration.
If they wanted to be considered with the best, play AA.
Its as simple as that.
IMO, which is hardly singular, you cant have a complete and meaningfull discussion about HS Hockey without it.Walter Sojack wrote:Packerboy, lets stay away from Private vs Public, A vs AA. You should know that
Welcome to the thread, Coach Oliver!61ache wrote:Isn't asking what private school the best like asking what venereal disease you'd most like to catch? IMHO they got it right when they banned them from the tourneys--everything that's wrong with HS hockey.
We go from a somewhat intelligent thread about a legitimate question to out and out private school bashing. I love this game!!!!!etune21 wrote:public schools like edina and roseau that dominate private schools day after day are the only thing that allows me to sleep at night. eff Holy angels, eff CDH, and most of all eff St. thomas
61ACHE,Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.hockeyrocks wrote:61ACHE,Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
I have to agree with Coffee Connoisseur on this one. What tourneys are you talking about them being banned from anyway? The "Frostbite Falls/Backbacon/Hoser Invitational" or the "Youbetcha/nine year old stained Polaris Jacket Jamboree?"![]()
Last time I checked, they are still pretty regular attendees in St. Paul every year whether we like it or not.
__________________
I'm just finishing my lutefisk and elk meat jerky
61ache wrote:What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.hockeyrocks wrote:61ACHE,Walter Sojack wrote:Thats a ridiculous statement
I have to agree with Coffee Connoisseur on this one. What tourneys are you talking about them being banned from anyway? The "Frostbite Falls/Backbacon/Hoser Invitational" or the "Youbetcha/nine year old stained Polaris Jacket Jamboree?"![]()
Last time I checked, they are still pretty regular attendees in St. Paul every year whether we like it or not.
__________________
I'm just finishing my lutefisk and elk meat jerky
You should know better than to bring up a public vs. private debate - you're going to get this thread locked.What tournament am I talking about? Private Schools were not allowed to play in the state tournament until 1975. Reason. Private schools recruit from around the metro area and attempt to "build" a team. What you're left with is stripping schools of the players they developed from a young age in order to build their programs. Which, is what I think is the major problem with HS hockey today. The idea that schools can manufacture a team. Agree or not, it's still what's happening today. At least there's teams like Roseau still winning--the only thing that keeps me watching HS hockey.
AMEN! (Can I say that?)packerboy wrote:You are not alone Walt. 125,000 of your closest friends agree with you every March.
I don't know if this was a self-fulfilling prophecy or just my experience of knowing how these threads turn out. Attaway, guys.east hockey wrote:If this thread turns into yet another public vs. private topic, it gets locked, and any future topics which even smell of the same will be deleted as soon as they're started.Jbone wrote:How fun would it be if kids stayed where they came from. That would be Minnesota hockey at it's finest!
Just so you know.
Lee