HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

defense wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:

ap4mvp wrote: LF is a bad team, did you fall on your head? The won the Central Lakes Conference title and went undefeated in 6A going 11-0 and now are on a 17 game winning streak.

hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"

actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????

i never said the conference was the SAME as the section i said PART OF...and i don't care if LF went undefeated or not, nor do i care who is in whatever section...i have better things to do with my time than get into a pissing match over mundane subtleties.

tbvdaost wrote:

defense wrote:

tbvdaost wrote: hes telling you the section shouldn't exist...then you told him about how lf went undefeated in the conference....isn't the conference part of the section??? good rebuttle "mvp"

actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????

i never said the conference was the SAME as the section i said PART OF...and i don't care if LF went undefeated or not, nor do i care who is in whatever section...i have better things to do with my time than get into a pissing match over mundane subtleties.

CLC= This school year (2007-08) will be our 30th anniversary. The CLC was originally formed on December 16, 1975, with the charter members being: Alexandria, Brainerd, Little Falls, St. Cloud Apollo, St. Cloud Tech, and Willmar. The conference began in 1977-78 school year and our new members are Rocori (1988-89), Sartell/St. Stephen (1995-96), Sauk Rapids/Rice (2001-02)and Fergus Falls (2005-06). Former members of the CLC are Cambridge, Elk River and Monticello.

ap4mvp wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:

defense wrote: actually Little Falls did not go undefeated in the conference and the conference is not the same as the section otherwise they would've been undefeated in the conference wich they were not. Here's a question brainiak: without looking who is in the Central Lakes Conference and Section 6A?????

i never said the conference was the SAME as the section i said PART OF...and i don't care if LF went undefeated or not, nor do i care who is in whatever section...i have better things to do with my time than get into a pissing match over mundane subtleties.

CLC= This school year (2007-08) will be our 30th anniversary. The CLC was originally formed on December 16, 1975, with the charter members being: Alexandria, Brainerd, Little Falls, St. Cloud Apollo, St. Cloud Tech, and Willmar. The conference began in 1977-78 school year and our new members are Rocori (1988-89), Sartell/St. Stephen (1995-96), Sauk Rapids/Rice (2001-02)and Fergus Falls (2005-06). Former members of the CLC are Cambridge, Elk River and Monticello.

nice.....very nice....

anybody with access to google.com could have recited that very same thing...hey ap4mvp, what is the age limit for competing in sports according to MSHSL rules, i figure you should know seeing as how you were exempt what with your learning disabilities.

tbvdaost wrote:anybody with access to google.com could have recited that very same thing...hey ap4mvp, what is the age limit for competing in sports according to MSHSL rules, i figure you should know seeing as how you were exempt what with your learning disabilities.

Well look's like you know how to use a computer look is up for yourself.

I'm the guy with the learning disabilities, but at least I can write in full sentences.

thats what you get at those big universities...sentence structures, and a bad liver.

tbvdaost wrote:thats what you get at those big universities...sentence structures, and a bad liver.

Sounds like you have experience.

nope, all i learned from a university was that i was just a number and an income.

tbvdaost wrote:nope, all i learned from a university was that i was just a number and an income.

You should have paid attention it have done wonders for you.

ap4mvp wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:nope, all i learned from a university was that i was just a number and an income.

You should have paid attention it have done wonders for you.

trust me buddy, your advice is flawed because if YOU paid attention, you would figure it out too

tbvdaost wrote:

ap4mvp wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:nope, all i learned from a university was that i was just a number and an income.

You should have paid attention it have done wonders for you.

trust me buddy, your advice is flawed because if YOU paid attention, you would figure it out too

Figure what out

no longer pertinent to the post at hand, go back to quoting your history of the CLC, it'll get you far in life.
Here's what does matter, LF will lose on Wednesday to STA, one or both of the Hanowskis will get hurt, and the final will be 3-2 St Thomas wins.

tbvdaost wrote:no longer pertinent to the post at hand, go back to quoting your history of the CLC, it'll get you far in life.
Here's what does matter, LF will lose on Wednesday to STA, one or both of the Hanowskis will get hurt, and the final will be 3-2 St Thomas wins.

Wow That's some prediction one of the Hanowskis will get hurt.

Pretty bold, and it probably won't happen, but I'll stick by it just in case.

snakedude11 wrote:[quote=" This seed 4, random draw 4 thing is a joke, not because we get #1 two years in a row but it is total nonsense to have a team like Litchfield not facing the #1 seed.

Yeah you kinda have to play the number 1 team at some point to win it all, so quit your crying if you want to trade STA for Warroad go ahead you'll still lose......[/quote]
First of all "dude" your grammar sucks! Your credibility takes a serious shot when you can't even get simple grammar correct ('you're' and 'their' from your first reply after my in). You don't have to play #1 to win it all illiterate dude. Last time I checked there are three rounds in the tourney and that gives #1 two chances to be knocked off before the title game, but based on your logic why even play the first two rounds. Let's just put #1 vs #2 and have them play a best of 3.

tbvdaost wrote:Pretty bold, and it probably won't happen, but I'll stick by it just in case.

Just in case is always a safe bet.

regulus wrote:

snakedude11 wrote:[quote=" This seed 4, random draw 4 thing is a joke, not because we get #1 two years in a row but it is total nonsense to have a team like Litchfield not facing the #1 seed.

Yeah you kinda have to play the number 1 team at some point to win it all, so quit your crying if you want to trade STA for Warroad go ahead you'll still lose......

quote :First of all "dude" your grammar sucks! Your credibility takes a serious shot when you can't even get simple grammar correct ('you're' and 'their' from your first reply after my in). You don't have to play #1 to win it all illiterate dude. Last time I checked there are three rounds in the tourney and that gives #1 two chances to be knocked off before the title game, but based on your logic why even play the first two rounds. Let's just put #1 vs #2 and have them play a best of 3.[/quote]

sounds good, lets do it.....

ap4mvp wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:Pretty bold, and it probably won't happen, but I'll stick by it just in case.

Just in case is always a safe bet.

]
Well, since I don't stand to lose any money on the deal, and I don't need your approval...it's a win win!

tbvdaost wrote:

ap4mvp wrote:

tbvdaost wrote:Pretty bold, and it probably won't happen, but I'll stick by it just in case.

Just in case is always a safe bet.

]
Well, since I don't stand to lose any money on the deal, and I don't need your approval...it's a win win!

tbvdaost wrote:thats what you get at those big universities...sentence structures, and a bad liver.

You can get that at any community college or private college too

tbvdaost wrote:no longer pertinent to the post at hand, go back to quoting your history of the CLC, it'll get you far in life.
Here's what does matter, LF will lose on Wednesday to STA, one or both of the Hanowskis will get hurt, and the final will be 3-2 St Thomas wins.

No you are sounding like Flammer!

If Sperl ever wants to play beyond high school now is the time to shine. The Flyers are going to have to get something out of their 2nd and 3rd lines in order to make this game competitive. To be the best you have to beat the best. Best of luck to the Little Falls Flyers

Little Falls 5
St. Thomas Academy 4

I have foreseen it

Quote:First of all "dude" your grammar sucks! Your credibility takes a serious shot when you can't even get simple grammar correct ('you're' and 'their' from your first reply after my in). You don't have to play #1 to win it all illiterate dude. Last time I checked there are three rounds in the tourney and that gives #1 two chances to be knocked off before the title game, but based on your logic why even play the first two rounds. Let's just put #1 vs #2 and have them play a best of 3.......Really Regulus my grammer offends you that much? Ouch the last time I checked I was talking hockey on here, I guess my point was too good for you so you had to go in the defensive mode. And just for the record my point about having the play the number one team was based on the fact that the number 1 team in class A has won in the last 3 years so like I said your going to have to do it at some point and time most likely if you want to win, and either way it doesn't matter which top 4 seed the small falls would have gotten because they wouldn't have beaten any of them....

snakedude11 wrote:Quote:First of all "dude" your grammar sucks! Your credibility takes a serious shot when you can't even get simple grammar correct ('you're' and 'their' from your first reply after my in). You don't have to play #1 to win it all illiterate dude. Last time I checked there are three rounds in the tourney and that gives #1 two chances to be knocked off before the title game, but based on your logic why even play the first two rounds. Let's just put #1 vs #2 and have them play a best of 3.......Really Regulus my grammer offends you that much? Ouch the last time I checked I was talking hockey on here, I guess my point was too good for you so you had to go in the defensive mode. And just for the record my point about having the play the number one team was based on the fact that the number 1 team in class A has won in the last 3 years so like I said your going to have to do it at some point and time most likely if you want to win, and either way it doesn't matter which top 4 seed the small falls would have gotten because they wouldn't have beaten any of them....

A tip for ya snakedude11 when ya want to quote somebody just click on the quote button then state your response.

something tells me that if back on Dec 31, the Flyers were victorious and they were awarded the number 4 seed, and some how drew Litchfield, many "blinded" LF falls wouldnt have been complaining so much...then again maybe thats just me.