Page 5 of 5
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:42 pm
by Skill Stick
I give them the Big 9 but no 1A. Im talking New Ulm as a whole. A 1-4 record. I just want to know whats going on?
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:01 pm
by winvil
sregit34 wrote:winvil wrote:Bdangles14 wrote:I disagree..........marshall has three solid lines for them and have been playing solid hockey latley........New ulm has a great hockey team this year and will be tough to beat. If marshall wants to beat new ulm they are going to have to play there very best and have very few mistakes if they are going to beat them, if they do that then i have a very close game with either marshall or new ulm winning in a 3-2 or 4-3 game.
P.S. Nick Einsenminger=Bender
Your just mad you lost 7-1.
Windom wins again and winvil is back i see... I wouldnt be flaunting too much buddy your windom squad has lost worse.. 9-2 and 9-3 that i know of..... oh and btw Worthington outshot you!!!!?? hm... Outside of a horrible goalie for worthington on thursday they played with you. congrats.
NICK EISENMENGER...bender. ADAM too
what stats you looking at kid? check the hockey hub.. the official site... might want to check your stats on an official site and not your paper which is going to bias.
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:03 pm
by winvil
Skill Stick wrote:Faribault- 3
New Ulm- 1
1-4 start for New Ulm. Whats going on?
faribault is really good this year though too.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:08 pm
by sregit34
Bret Oeltjenbruns....BENDER
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:41 pm
by letsgowild
Big game on tuesday, Litch at Hutch who's going to win? I predict Hutch wins 5 to 3.
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:59 pm
by sregit34
ill second that.. 5-3....hutch...Litch dont have the goaltending....Got a win over willmar 2-0..Willmar put a good showing though and outshot hutch if i know correctly.. maybe hutch aint as strong or maybe willmar is stronger this year..anyway hutch takes down the dragons.
So im just sayin.. If windom doesnt win 18 games this year then that is absolutely pathetic.. same for redwood too... they should actually both win more.than that.. i was looking at schedules for teams in this section.. my god, heaven forbid windom or redwood play anyone. Honestly the best competition they play is within their own conference.. MARSHALL.. marshall is pretty good i say but come on you are not going to see a whole lot of improvement playing two tough games a year. Rediculous.
keep playing fairmont waseca and st. peter...... pad your stats.. but i would be embarassed. Windom already has three losses.... ooohh.... ill give them props though at least they play new ulm once... Redwood honestly plays no one ever.. dont even challenge themselves at a holiday tournament. If redwood doesnt win over twenty games its an embarassment to section 3a and soutwest conference..ha
I see windom loses to morris..... Morris is way down this year losing their starting goalie and leading scorers including PJ Lindblad who was a d*** good player.....
#5 Bret Oelta-hawk-a-lugie..... Bender tender
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:05 pm
by sregit34
My prediction for section 3a champs.....
1-4. (marshall, hutch, litch, new ulm) random order... It will be fun to see these teams play each other... the marshall new ulm game.. wow what a hockey game... fun to see how it plays out any of these teams have a chance. It will come down to goaltending... Litch has the weakest so i would porbably count them toward the 4 spot.. but you never know that why the games are played.
5-6. redwood or windom
7.sleepy eye
8.worthington
9.Fairmont
10. Luverne
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:43 am
by Bdangles14
I have hutch over litchfield 5-1
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:22 pm
by goldy313
Sregit34, who are these teams going to play? Who is going to come down to Windom? Why would they when teams they have teams much closer to them. For instance Orono is a A team at the far west end of the metro area and they're still 3 - 3.5 hours away. Given school budgets how can Windom justify going to the cities 10 times a year to play a game? I'm sure if you want to donate $10k-$20k per year so they can go play better competition the school won't turn it down.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm
by Newulmpucker2010
Don't be fooled by New Ulm's 1-4 record. Now that they have a full squad, the season will more than likely turn around. Along with most people on this forum, I still hold my belief that New Ulm will be a major contender for the section title.
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:43 pm
by extra_attacker
Newulmpucker2010 wrote:Don't be fooled by New Ulm's 1-4 record. Now that they have a full squad, the season will more than likely turn around. Along with most people on this forum, I still hold my belief that New Ulm will be a major contender for the section title.
I'm calling it right now that new ulm doesn't win a game until they play Fairmont in the beginning of January.

new topic
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:18 pm
by winvil
on the main page it is just section 3a now... probably don't want to be posting about the season on a preseason topic... plus the new one has a poll.
Section 3A -- is the name