HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:27 pm**

Bantam B-1 Standings
Team Games Won Lost Tied Points Fairplay Total Points
Eden Prairie Red 16 11 2 3 25 15 40

Burnsville 16 10 4 2 22 12 34

Edina Green 16 9 4 3 21 13 34

Edina White 16 11 4 1 23 7 30

Jefferson 16 8 5 3 19 11 30

Chaska 16 7 5 4 18 10 28

Eden Prairie Black 16 7 5 4 18 10 28

Minnetonka 16 7 9 0 14 11 25

this is it finished burnsville white and i think chaska all get the ties

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:15 pm**

really hurt edina white to only get 7 our of 16. oh well

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:51 pm**

Yea if I am reading that right above Edina White had the 2nd best points for win/loss but could not get the FPP point to stay up in the standings. oh well is right, FPP no longer matters in the playoffs.

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:12 pm**

highschoolhockeyfan wrote:Bantam B-1 Standings
Team Games Won Lost Tied Points Fairplay Total Points
Eden Prairie Red 16 11 2 3 25 15 40
Burnsville 16 10 4 2 22 12 34
Edina Green 16 9 4 3 21 14 34
Edina White 16 11 4 1 23 7 30
Jefferson 16 8 5 3 19 11 30
Chaska 16 7 5 4 18 10 28
Eden Prairie Black 16 7 5 4 18 10 28
Minnetonka 16 7 9 0 14 11 25

this is it finished burnsville white and i think chaska all get the ties

did u miss type or what because it says edina green has 21 points and 14 FPP so shouldnt it be 35 total points for them?

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:16 pm**

yea i accidently erased it and forgot but it is 13

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:20 pm**

o ok thanks

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:52 pm**

when are they out?

Posted: **Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:55 pm**

Good timing mr. ice... here they are:

Code: Select all

1         Eden Prairie B1 Red           78.8      36-4-4
2         Centennial B1 Red             78.7      27-9-3
3         Edina B1 Green                78.6      26-8-3
4         Edina B1 White                77.5      28-7-4
5         Blaine B1                     77.2      37-7-1
6         Wayzata B1 Blue               76.3      27-7-2
7         Elk River B1                  76.1      29-4-0
8         Burnsville B1                 75.1      23-7-2
9         Stillwater B1                 74.7      25-11-5
10        Eden Prairie B1 Black         74.4      21-14-2
11        Chaska B1                     74.2      22-15-3
12        White Bear Lake B1 Orange     74.0      26-8-3
13        Jefferson B1                  73.3      27-13-6
14        Woodbury B1                   72.9      43-7-3
15        Chisago Lakes B1              72.3      30-5-3
16        Minnetonka B1                 71.1      24-19-2
17        White Bear Lake B1 Black      70.2      19-7-2
18        Blake                         69.3      19-9-3
19        Moorhead B1                   68.2      10-9-0
20        Maple Grove B1                67.7      20-8-3
21        Duluth East B1                65.9      20-7-4
22        Eagan B1                      65.8      18-10-6
23        Andover B1                    63.3      20-17-2
24        St. Cloud B1 Black            62.7      14-8-3
25        Wayzata B1 Gold               61.9      20-14-2

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:24 am**

Very accurate Pioneer. It seems that your system gets better and better through the year as the teams play more and more. Right now is the best I've seen. Thanks for doing this for the secret society all season. It has got to be a ton of work!

By the way what association are you associated with?

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:30 pm**

Not sure why Woodbury gets the short end of the stick, with 43 wins??? They have same amount of losses as Bvlle and Wayzata Blue and a ton more wins than either of those two higher ranked teams....seems like a flaw on that one. Strength of schedule deserves consideration but its not like Bvlle is playing quality teams outside of D6...43 wins is a ton of freakin wins.....or is that a typo?

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:02 pm**

Regarding the pioneer rankings:

Keep in mind that 5 pts equates to 1 goal, so Woodbury is rated only one goal per game differential lower than #1 EP Red. I think these rankings are a little biased against teams like Woodbury that consistently win but, but typically by smaller margins. B'ville is ranked high because when they lose, they lose only by a goal or two.

A couple of teams missing from the top twenty are the Rochester teams. They both had strong showings in their tourney this past weekend when Red went 4-1 and took Woodbury into OT and Black lost two close ones to Blaine who went 7-0 during the last week, yet lost ground in the rankings.

Pioneer still has the best rankings out there.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:41 pm**

No question Pioneer's are the best. Someone will always be able to find something to disagree with.

I think another thing that is taken into his rankings is the strength of schedule. Woodbury has beaten a bunch of weaker teams and had much closer games with the top 20 teams.

If I were Woodbury, I would start to worry about burn-out this time of the year. That is a bunch more games than anyone else has played. Practices are taken for granted this day in age.

I think its funny how when there are no D6 teams playing this thread slows down to nothing.

It looks like all of the Districts are final. The best part of the season starts now!

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:35 pm**

Puckhead2 wrote:Not sure why Woodbury gets the short end of the stick, with 43 wins??? They have same amount of losses as Bvlle and Wayzata Blue and a ton more wins than either of those two higher ranked teams....seems like a flaw on that one. Strength of schedule deserves consideration but its not like Bvlle is playing quality teams outside of D6...43 wins is a ton of freakin wins.....or is that a typo?

Not losing to Chaska twice by 4-1 score each time would have helped your case. Woodbury is about right where they belong from what I have seen of their team and the teams that are in front of you.

And you know what? As great and as accurate as I believe these to be; they do not matter at all right now. NEW SEASON STARTS NOW!

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:52 pm**

Woodbury is right where they belong. Compared to the teams above them their goaltending is the missing link.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:05 pm**

I feel those stats are real accurate. it all starts at 0-0 again now.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:15 pm**

i dont understand why ep black is so high they havent been playing good lately

also, although the rankings are good, but you need to add a human part that has an affect but not a big affect

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:18 pm**

Here are some fun facts for the Secret Society.

The answer is "Yes" I need a life.

There are 126 teams at the Bantam B1 level in 12 districts.

Here are the unofficial League Champions. Unofficial because I got them from websites. Some leagues do not have official standings. Most do, anyway here goes:

1: Highland/Central
2: White Bear Lake Black
3: Wayzata Blue
4: Waseca
5: Sartell
6: Eden Prairie Red
8: Woodbury
10: Chisago Lakes
11: Duluth East
12: Grand Rapids
15: Moorhead Black
16: Roseau

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:05 pm**

SPS - Thx for the work! It will be interesting to see how many of these champions actually get to state.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:12 pm**

I find it interesting that all districts for the playoff format except D10 use the double elimination bracket format. Does MN hockey have any rules for district playoffs or is this up to each disctrict to decide the playoff format. I look at a team several teams from D10 and 1 good team will not make the regional (Chisago Lakes, Blaine, Cent. Red, Elk River). It's to bad that a team may not have the opportunity to play into the tourney if a team should have a bad game early in round robin play.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:15 pm**

with the goofy pool play and then the ONE CHANCE play in game format they are now going with, don't be surprised if they're are fewer of these teams at State then you might think.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:17 pm**

in district 6 two good teams wont even get to play in the district double elimination tournament

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:24 pm**

LESHABS,

You hit the nail on the head there. Some of the listed good teams will beat themselfs, some will get beat by hot teams, and some will get beat by the crappy regional playoff system. The people who came up with that playoff system should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:35 pm**

why mess with a good thing

are they going to have a pool play for state next or what

Posted: **Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:33 pm**

very observant my2... both rochester teams were next:

Code: Select all

26        Rochester Red                 61.7      17-12-4
27        Rochester Black               61.5      18-22-2

I did not get all the scores from the rochester tourney... anyone got them?

Posted: **Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:20 am**

Can't agree with you more My2Cents. All this board is are people clammering about the EP's, Edina's and all the other cake eating towns. The lowly District 8 doesn't hardly make the map, when there are ligitmately 5 teams in the District who could make a run. I like the rankings though, so that guy is doing a great job, but the talk from parents who thinks their B Bantam player will be the next Neal Broten is quite amusing

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

2006-07 Bantam B1 preview

computer rankings 2/12

computer rankings 2/12

ranks

unofficial league results

B Bantams playoffs

rochester