Page 6 of 7

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:44 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Puckguy- they like to tell everybody that they are class A so when they win the state tournament they can tell every one on the board that they could of beat the AA schools too. :wink:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:51 pm
by Git-R-Done
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:Puckguy- they like to tell everybody that they are class A so when they win the state tournament they can tell every one on the board that they could of beat the AA schools too. :wink:
5 to 2 is a far cry from the 15 to 1 beating Warroad gave Roseau a few years ago.

No doubt Roso has a great team this year, they may go undefeated.

We will see if Warroad's blue line people can get with the program in a couple weeks.

If they get by the Warriors again, they have a good chance of going undefeated.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:54 pm
by fiveforfighting
The fact that the rams really slowed down in the 3rd was dissapointing, but overall they were the better team.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:57 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Git-R-Done wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:Puckguy- they like to tell everybody that they are class A so when they win the state tournament they can tell every one on the board that they could of beat the AA schools too. :wink:
5 to 2 is a far cry from the 15 to 1 beating Warroad gave Roseau a few years ago.

No doubt Roso has a great team this year, they may go undefeated.

We will see if Warroad's blue line people can get with the program in a couple weeks.

If they get by the Warriors again, they have a good chance of going undefeated.
Git-r-done Idoubt you even watched the game, if it wasn't for the outstanding play of the blue line it could of been 15-1.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:58 pm
by rams80
Git-R-Done wrote:
Puckguy19 wrote:
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:For gavin, no real payback for YOUR nightmares....elliott70 no double digits; for watchdog you need to watch closer even Ram Hockey and AY were heavy and CornBread..only in your dreams :lol: ...it was an @ss kicking none the less but no more than other A squad has taken. They defintely are beatable will a Class A team do it...no way....will they repeat...that remains too be seen.
A sad day to see Warroad fans terming themselves as a Class A team. Certainly not the proud tradition of years past! 8)
What?

New handle already Billy Mac?.......Tool :roll:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:03 pm
by Git-R-Done
fiveforfighting wrote:The fact that the rams really slowed down in the 3rd was dissapointing, but overall they were the better team.
I dont think they slowed down, just poor self-control. Perhaps Lund went across the street between the 2nd & 3rd.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:08 pm
by Git-R-Done
rams80 wrote:
Git-R-Done wrote:
Puckguy19 wrote: A sad day to see Warroad fans terming themselves as a Class A team. Certainly not the proud tradition of years past! 8)
What?

New handle already Billy Mac?.......Tool :roll:
No, I was including all defense, although, Ramboy, you could use some tips from Billy Mac.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:12 pm
by slashman42
GR3343 wrote:
Gopher Blog wrote:
slashman42 wrote: Nope - you missed the word "Two".
LOL, that is what I was thinking. :lol:

I find it funny that somebody complains how assists have been dealt out over many decades.
Not complaining, just asking a simple question. Did you notice I said, "I know this is an excessive example"? Lighten up, Ness is God. You guys happy? :roll:
:lol:

Actually I was more pointing out the fact that calling assists is moreso by discression and up to officials opinion, and not based on "last two that touch the puck" or "unique" players. About 3 minutes of googling rebutted that.

A better excessive example would have been one guy leads out, then 2 guys pass the puck back and fourth about a dozen times, then one of them scores. Your excessive example didn't even fit the rule condition, that 2 assists are handed out. And personally, I could care less about if anyone deserved an assist or not, or if phantom assists are called. What's called is called, so be it. Move on.

Ness played extremely well, and for 2 periods, Roseau took it to the Warriors as a whole. Both a let down followed by a definite pickup in play led to late Warrior goals. I actually found it slightly concerning if I was a Roseau fan that their coach tells the kids to finish delivering the message, yet they came out flat. Obvioulsy what else is a coach to say, but the kids didn't respond for some reason. I'm sure that was addressed after the game.

And I got texted by Hahn about a half-hour after the game ended! :)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:13 pm
by rams80
Git-R-Done wrote:
No, I was including all defense, although, Ramboy, you could use some tips from Billy Mac.

Tips? What on how to get the boot out of Roseau, the house, the job in Baudette? I think not Billy boy aka Git R Done :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:18 pm
by Git-R-Done
rams80 wrote:
Git-R-Done wrote:
No, I was including all defense, although, Ramboy, you could use some tips from Billy Mac.

Tips? What on how to get the boot out of Roseau, the house, the job in Baudette? I think not Billy boy aka Git R Done :lol:
OK, Ram-myself, for the 2nd time, I AM NOT BILLY.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:29 pm
by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
I would like to know who Skime Store, Ram80, Neil-gyf, Berg Renloz, Dexter (I think I got you), Git-R-Done, and 6th Line Center all are. They could use some extra ticket takers at the Bantam tourney. Anyone have extra time?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:36 pm
by rams80
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I would like to know who Skime Store, Ram80, Neil-gyf, Berg Renloz, Dexter (I think I got you), Git-R-Done, and 6th Line Center all are. They could use some extra ticket takers at the Bantam tourney. Anyone have extra time?

I'll be there but UHL/Get R Done are tied up in Rehab :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:04 pm
by CHICKA CHICKA WHAT
Awesome game.. i thought warroad was making a strong effort at the end but not enough to get by the dominant roseau

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:12 pm
by Gopher Blog
slashman42 wrote:Actually I was more pointing out the fact that calling assists is moreso by discression and up to officials opinion, and not based on "last two that touch the puck" or "unique" players. About 3 minutes of googling rebutted that.
Then explain how any time there are two assists given out on a play, it happens to come from the last two players that touched the puck prior to the goal scorer. Yes, there are exceptions such as unassisted goals or if only one offensive player touches the puck after getting it from an opponent and feeds a guy for a goal and gets the loan assist. But in plays where two assists are given out, they are given to the last two offensive players to touch the puck besides the goal scorer (which is what I meant by "unique" players).

The rule book explanation you used is vague but I have been around hockey 30+ years and assists have always been given out in that fashion by game scorers in NHL games.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:25 pm
by Indians forever
CHICKA CHICKA WHAT wrote:Awesome game.. i thought warroad was making a strong effort at the end but not enough to get by the dominant roseau
I agree it was a fun game to watch at the end. for a moment there it looked like Warroad was going to make a comeback, but Roseau is just too good for that to happen!! good game by both squads.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:25 pm
by slashman42
Gopher Blog wrote:
slashman42 wrote:Actually I was more pointing out the fact that calling assists is moreso by discression and up to officials opinion, and not based on "last two that touch the puck" or "unique" players. About 3 minutes of googling rebutted that.
Then explain how any time there are two assists given out on a play, it happens to come from the last two players that touched the puck prior to the goal scorer. Yes, there are exceptions such as unassisted goals or if only one offensive player touches the puck after getting it from an opponent and feeds a guy for a goal and gets the loan assist. But in plays where two assists are given out, they are given to the last two offensive players to touch the puck besides the goal scorer (which is what I meant by "unique" players).

The rule book explanation you used is vague but I have been around hockey 30+ years and assists have always been given out in that fashion by game scorers in NHL games.
In general that's correct and that seems to be the way it's called. But there seems to be no set-in-stone method to determine assists either. The earlier questioning on Ness's 1st assist was because of the intermediate passing between two players. I'd guess that if there was more passing between the 2 before the goal, Ness may not have gotten the assist because of the amount of play that followed his initial breakout pass. I've seen enough non-assist calls as well that support that. But his pass was key to the breakout, and thus the assist called IMO. And agreed that the rulebook definition is vague - blame the NHL for that.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:13 pm
by BERG RENOLZ
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I would like to know who Skime Store, Ram80, Neil-gyf, Berg Renloz, Dexter (I think I got you), Git-R-Done, and 6th Line Center all are. They could use some extra ticket takers at the Bantam tourney. Anyone have extra time?
Busy! Skime Store hooked us up with some beauties with summerteeth this weekend. Berg is going deep into the underbrush! :lol:

I know who you are, i'm pretty sure anyway, so how come you don't know who i am? Figure it out!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:30 pm
by Git-R-Done
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
Git-R-Done wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:Puckguy- they like to tell everybody that they are class A so when they win the state tournament they can tell every one on the board that they could of beat the AA schools too. :wink:
5 to 2 is a far cry from the 15 to 1 beating Warroad gave Roseau a few years ago.

No doubt Roso has a great team this year, they may go undefeated.

We will see if Warroad's blue line people can get with the program in a couple weeks.

If they get by the Warriors again, they have a good chance of going undefeated.
Git-r-done Idoubt you even watched the game, if it wasn't for the outstanding play of the blue line it could of been 15-1.
Wrong, the play of the goalie was the key.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:30 pm
by Skime Store
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I would like to know who Skime Store, Ram80, Neil-gyf, Berg Renloz, Dexter (I think I got you), Git-R-Done, and 6th Line Center all are. They could use some extra ticket takers at the Bantam tourney. Anyone have extra time?
I would love to help but can't this weekend. Maybe see you at the Legion for one or the zamboni room. How about solo lover? Can he help.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:14 am
by gavin
Jack wrote:
gavin wrote:
Jack wrote:Roseau should win this game, but nobody should forget what happened to the Rams in 05 when these two teams played on FSN.
It was '04. Trust me.

Vengeance is on the way.

ROSEAU - 15

warroad - 1
Well I did have the year wrong, Unit. I meant to say 06 when my lil bro, mac, and the freshman phenom Ness had their winning streak ended by the Warriors on national tv.
Word.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:49 am
by NeilGuf-yb
Skime Store wrote:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I would like to know who Skime Store, Ram80, Neil-gyf, Berg Renloz, Dexter (I think I got you), Git-R-Done, and 6th Line Center all are. They could use some extra ticket takers at the Bantam tourney. Anyone have extra time?
I would love to help but can't this weekend. Maybe see you at the Legion for one or the zamboni room. How about solo lover? Can he help.
I'm already helping out!

Big Game

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:08 pm
by Cornbread
Who won the basketball game? Warroad or Roseau?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:18 pm
by Jack
I don't think Warroad or Roseau have basketball teams.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:21 pm
by stxnpux
They play basketball in Roseau? :shock:

They play basketball in Roseau?

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:26 pm
by Cornbread
They never played very well when we put the beat down on them...but I do remember them having a white Jordan dominating for them. Also enjoyed taking there cheerleaders out back behind the woodshed.