Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:20 am
28-0 this year, 19-0 since they last lost a game. Don't tell me that not loosing in that many games has no impact on seedings. It may be for this year's tourney, but it's been over 14 months since they last lost, INCLUDING last years tourney. #1 is the logical choice here.packerboy wrote:Again, if there wasnt a team called Edina who only lost 2 games by one goal to BSM and Tonka, who Roseau didnt play , it would be easy.onbison09 wrote:47-0-0, Aaron Ness, Mike Lee, just a couple reasons why if they aren't number 1 there needs to be an FBI investigation.packerboy wrote: Another brilliant response. Why dont you give us your argument as to why Roseau who plays the 40th toughest schedule in the state should be the #1 seed so we can all figure it out?
BIAFP, who won last year shouldn't mean squat. We are seeding the 2008 tournament. I mean come on, should we seed Moorhead #2 every year they come down?
I doubt coaches analyze individual talent in seeding meetings .
That being said, they have the hardest route to go to bring it home again. And if they do, Roseau fans will have more rights to brag around here than anyone else.
