packerboy wrote:
I would be fine with 16 teams if :
1. We go back to one class
2. It could be played at one venue and in a short time span.
There will never be an ageement to mix the 2 classes in a 16 team tournament. AHA vs Albert Lea would not be pretty. In addition, all teams should face the same level of competition in the sections if they are all going to the same state tournament.
The hockey tournamnet is not like the football playoffs. It has its own unique traditions and one of them is a single location for the championship bracket games. The other is that it is played in a short time span. Its an event and a big one.
As far as thinking highly of teams who compete in the lower classes, my attitude is the more power to them so long as that kind of participaton does not diminish the accomplishments nor the experience of those who compete at the highest competitive level.
Hockey does a great job. With the exception of going to Mariucci for the losers on Friday, nothing much has changed the experience for the AA participants and their family and fans as a result of adding Class A.
You could start the tournament on Tuesday and play it straight through Saturday, half the bracket would be playing 4 games in 4 nights, which although tough, I think would be something all those kids would be willing to deal with. Or, if you wanted to give them a rest, you could start it on Monday, and play 3rd place/consolation championship in primetime on Friday night, and make the championship the only game on Saturday night. So that's 1, at most 2 days more than the tourney is now, anyone here opposed to more hockey?
Also, I would agree with your point regarding the strength of scheduling if sections weren't already uneven. 5AA is tons more stacked than even 1AA, so the issue doesn't hold any water because it wouldn't be a new situation, and the MSHSL already alters sections in a two year rotation to address competitive issues. With a 16 team format, getting to the "Final Four" or winning it all would be the accomplishment, not just getting there. Also if we had applied this idea to the 2007 tournament we would have had these matchups:
Section 1 Albert Lea vs Century
Section 2 Duluth Marshall vs Woodbury
Section 3 St. Thomas vs Hill Murray
Section 4 Little Falls vs Blaine
and on the other side
Section 5 Blake vs Burnsville
Section 6 Orono vs Edina
Section 7 Hermantown vs Grand Rapids
Section 8 Warroad vs Roseau
Ok, I see 1, 3 max potentially painful to watch games here. Edina vs Orono would be bad probably, Blake vs Bville might have gotten ugly, and AL vs Century could have been bad. Otherwise, I can see Marshall beating Woodbury, STA and HM would be a coin flip, LF if they showed up like they did vs Htown could take Blaine, and Hermantown could've beat Rapids.
I don't see anything bad here. Besides, Edina beat Blaine 6-1 in consolation and no one gave a hoot. Blowouts happen even at the largest stage of competition. Not every championship tournament is close all the time.