Page 7 of 7
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:36 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.
So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:39 pm
by Can't Never Tried
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.
So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx
that's in the top 10??

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:48 pm
by packerboy
HAL ranks Roseau's schedule at #47.
HAL has a chip or 2 loose on occasion but he usually isn't that far off.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:50 pm
by Can't Never Tried
packerboy wrote:HAL ranks Roseau's schedule at #47.
HAL has a chip or 2 loose on occasion but he usually isn't that far off.
Well PB... he did say last 5 games, but c'mon that line up isn't gonna be a top 10 for even 5 games. Is it????

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:55 pm
by packerboy
There is only one source that I would trust to answer that question, CNT:

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:19 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Can't Never Tried wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.
So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx
that's in the top 10??

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:23 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Can't Never Tried wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.
So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx
that's in the top 10??

It was found on this forum, scroll down to Minnesota hockey rankings all the info is there.

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:30 pm
by Can't Never Tried
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.
So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx
that's in the top 10??

It was found on this forum, scroll down to Minnesota hockey rankings all the info is there.

Not sure on that...

may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.
Clarification requested from admin please!!!
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:35 pm
by Neutron 14
Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that...

may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.
Clarification requested from admin please!!!
What we got here is... failure to communicate.
Thats last 5 total, not strength.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:38 pm
by Can't Never Tried
Neutron 14 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that...

may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.
Clarification requested from admin please!!!
What we got here is... failure to communicate.
Thats last 5 total, not strength.
Close enough to admin for me

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:39 pm
by OGEE OGELTHORPE
Neutron 14 wrote:Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that...

may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.
Clarification requested from admin please!!!
What we got here is... failure to communicate.
Thats last 5 total, not strength.
Thanks for the Claification on that, I graduated from the Marilyn Woodhead sped reading class.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:00 pm
by Neutron 14
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
Thanks for the Claification on that, I graduated from the Marilyn Woodhead sped reading class.
Ben they're, dun that!
I think the last 5 is weighted in the total, so it adds a momentum factor. "Whose Hot".