HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

charlie-oh wrote:WBL will have tough time gonig any further. H-M has too mcuh firepower!

WB and HM always have tough competitive games - should be another great game.

charlie-oh wrote:WBL will have tough time gonig any further. H-M has too mcuh firepower!

To much FP?? One line and mostly one girl. I'm more worried about their goalie. They beat Tartan 11-2. Did they play Rolondo? Hill beat WB earlier 4-2 in a very close game. Anything can happen. Any team can beat any team.

Should be a great game.

I predict.

WBL 3 HM 2

Go Bears!

Melvin44 wrote:

charlie-oh wrote:WBL will have tough time gonig any further. H-M has too mcuh firepower!

To much FP?? One line and mostly one girl. I'm more worried about their goalie. They beat Tartan 11-2. Did they play Rolondo? Hill beat WB earlier 4-2 in a very close game.

HM 4 - WB 2 - Very Close Game Thanksgiving weekend in November - HM second game of season
First: H-M. Brandt (H. Brandt, Doyle), 3:39. Second: H-Doyle (M. Brandt, H. Brandt), 11:59. Third: H-H. Brandt (M. Brandt, Pendleton), 3:22; W-Hill (Marcotte), 7:15; H-Pendleton (Magill, H. Brandt), 9:45, pp; W-Bruestle (Green, Hill), 13:52. Saves: H-McKeever 5-7-10--22; W-Abrahamson 6-6-7--19

Well nothing can ever be taken for granted in sections. Irondale plays 8th seeded Blaine Saturday and my daughte ris over-confident, but even the 8th seed can win.

The game I saw at the beginning of the season was essentially even. So I would be very surprised for a margin greater than 1 here. Usually in tight games or OT it comes down to one great play. HM hasn't made a section final since I've been paying attention and so I'm going to have to predict they finally do. I'll leave the losing big to Roseville post for after this game (and that will be for whomever wins). I'll take HM 3-2 and I'd be happy to console Melvin after the game...

Sparlimb wrote:Well nothing can ever be taken for granted in sections. Irondale plays 8th seeded Blaine Saturday and my daughte ris over-confident, but even the 8th seed can win.

The game I saw at the beginning of the season was essentially even. So I would be very surprised for a margin greater than 1 here. Usually in tight games or OT it comes down to one great play. HM hasn't made a section final since I've been paying attention and so I'm going to have to predict they finally do. I'll leave the losing big to Roseville post for after this game (and that will be for whomever wins). I'll take HM 3-2 and I'd be happy to console Melvin after the game...

Your good to me spareribs. But we'll just have to see. It's just a game right.

Stillwater 6 NSP 2

Melvin44 wrote:To much FP?? One line and mostly one girl. I'm more worried about their goalie. They beat Tartan 11-2. Did they play Rolondo?

No, Rolando didn't play (an 8th-grader played). I believe she got hurt in the previous Hill game a couple weeks ago and hasn't played since.

Tough spot for a young player. I'm sorry to hear that Kaitlyn was hurt. She's an awsome player.

So any predications or observations on the semi-finals at Aldrich on Tuesday night 2/16?

6 PM Hill Murray vs. White Bear
8 PM Rosveille vs. Stillwater

Stillwater 3 Roseville 2
Hill-Murray 3 WBL 1

I predict

Stillwater- 4
Roseville- 2

Hill-Murray- 3
White Bear- 1

Roseville 8
Stillwater 2


Hill-Murray 4
White Bear Lake 3

Stillwater 4 Roseville 2 with an empty net goal.

White Bear Lake 5 - Hill Murray 4 (OT)

Roseville 6 Stillwater 3
Hill 5 WBL 3

5-2 and 3-1.

Hill Murray 4 WB 2

First: HM-Pendleton (H. Brandt, Doyle), 8:01, pp; WBL-Hanson (Hill, Green), 12:25, pp.
Second: WBL-Ness (Bruestle, Dysthe), 3:04; HM-M. Brandt (H. Brandt), 4:11.
Third: HM-McDowell (Cusick), 3:41; HM-Magill, 16:28, en.
Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 2-5-6--13;
HM-McKeever 6-12-13--31

Roseville was up 3-0 early in the 3rd when we left

joehockey wrote:Hill Murray 4 WB 2

First: HM-Pendleton (H. Brandt, Doyle), 8:01, pp; WBL-Hanson (Hill, Green), 12:25, pp.
Second: WBL-Ness (Bruestle, Dysthe), 3:04; HM-M. Brandt (H. Brandt), 4:11.
Third: HM-McDowell (Cusick), 3:41; HM-Magill, 16:28, en.
Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 2-5-6--13;
HM-McKeever 6-12-13--31

Roseville was up 3-0 early in the 3rd when we left

4-0 final...Roseville has lifted the curse of Stillwater in the sections! Good luck to the Raiders in the Section Final against Hill-Murray.

Roseville has only lost one time to Stillwater in sectionals and that was last years final so not sure if it was a "curse". Great game though. Should be an exciting final.

joehockey wrote:Hill Murray 4 WB 2

First: HM-Pendleton (H. Brandt, Doyle), 8:01, pp; WBL-Hanson (Hill, Green), 12:25, pp.
Second: WBL-Ness (Bruestle, Dysthe), 3:04; HM-M. Brandt (H. Brandt), 4:11.
Third: HM-McDowell (Cusick), 3:41; HM-Magill, 16:28, en.
Saves:
WBL-Abrahamson 2-5-6--13;
HM-McKeever 6-12-13--31

Roseville was up 3-0 early in the 3rd when we left

Congrats girls and good luck in the Finals!

WB/Hill was a very good game with solid play by both squads. Good refing, so no excuses. However if you told me before the game that the WB South line would be limited to one goal, that the Bears would not be lopsided in penalty minutes, out shoot them 2-1, scoring chances 3-1 and not win I would have thought you were nuts. McKeever was the difference in this game. Good luck to the Pioneers on Friday

GO HILL MURRAY!!!!!!

3-2 over Roseville

Roseville 5 Hill-Murray 2
I think the difference will be Roseville's forwards against Hill-Murray's defense. Both teams have great goaltending and 1st lines but Roseville has more depth in forwards and defense in my opinion.

I have to go with Roseville. Roseville has depth and HM does not. However, I wouldn't be surprised if HM wins because I've known for a long time that there's always a chance to win if you have Hannah Brandt and a good goalie and HM has both.

3-2 Roseville in OT

I've seen Hill-Murray and Roseville both play many times this year. HM has a very nice team. Strong forwards, good quick D, and a very talented goalie. Roseville has some of the top talent in the state - Brausan, Duellman, Witwicke, Capistrant, Logan, etc.... not to mention a couple of outstanding goalies of their own in Boss and Allen. The game tonight no doubt will be a barn-burner. This may be one of the marquee games of the season so far - Aldrich will be rockin', it'll be a lot of fun! No disrespect to H/M, but I have to go with the Raiders because of experience and bench strength 5-2......good luck to both teams tonight, you've worked hard to get here and deserve to be in this game!