Page 10 of 46
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:44 pm
by SB24
warroad 6
low 0
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:16 pm
by SiouxRecruit
SB24 wrote:schwang17 wrote:Threads like this get the Schwang(PR graduate) back in action again.
SB, nice to see you again. Same goes to all the other regulars THAT WENT THROUGH ALL OF THIS SAME CRAP LAST YEAR...
Lehrke is still the best, nothing has changed, except for his experience and grit. Quit beating this obvious topic to death and talk about something else(like McMorrow being 2nd best? 
) for christ sake...
Been here all along...you still gonna be here next year? BTW, Ravendalen is still better, Hahn second best!
ohh jeezz.....here we go....who ended up doing better in elites?...oh yea thats right..not bryce
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:17 pm
by SiouxRecruit
Wave Fan 68 wrote:iminilbsahshfan wrote:East Grand Forks and ParkRapids play in two weeks and thats should settle this, til then just cool it ok!
yes we will see and lehrke will get shut down no pts.
Yea maybe they will shut him down like last year...caugh "2 goals" caugh...and hes only gotten that much better after doing quite well in elites...but im sure you haev a good reason of why you think that?
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:06 am
by SB24
maybe because walker shut him down??????
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:28 am
by Undercover Hockey Lover
E70....Warriors 6 - 0 over LOW so they didn't cover your 9...shots were 43 to 16. Sounded like Warroad pretty much put away their A game after the first so there's the reason it wasn't double digits. At one point early second shots were 32 to 5. 'nuff said.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:50 am
by Flin Flon
SiouxRecruit wrote:Wave Fan 68 wrote:iminilbsahshfan wrote:East Grand Forks and ParkRapids play in two weeks and thats should settle this, til then just cool it ok!
yes we will see and lehrke will get shut down no pts.
Yea maybe they will shut him down like last year...caugh "2 goals" caugh...and hes only gotten that much better after doing quite well in elites...but im sure you haev a good reason of why you think that?
Caugh caugh???? Great spelling Sioux recruit? I hope you knowledge of the game is better than your spelling. The bottom line is that Lehrke is a non factor for the season! He may score 60-70 goals but is won't be enough to get his team past the second round of the section tournament. Bottom line is he and Park are a non factor. Never have been a factor and never will be a factor. Sorry to break the news to ya. good player but a below average team.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:32 am
by elliott70
Undercover Hockey Lover wrote:E70....Warriors 6 - 0 over LOW so they didn't cover your 9...shots were 43 to 16. Sounded like Warroad pretty much put away their A game after the first so there's the reason it wasn't double digits. At one point early second shots were 32 to 5. 'nuff said.
But still running time.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:49 am
by newsguy35
SB24 wrote:maybe because walker shut him down??????
I would assume that PR didnt play him that game or if they did, only a small role. There would be no reason to play a stud against a team in their inaugural season...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:04 am
by the mullet
Flin Flon wrote:SiouxRecruit wrote:Wave Fan 68 wrote:
yes we will see and lehrke will get shut down no pts.
Yea maybe they will shut him down like last year...caugh "2 goals" caugh...and hes only gotten that much better after doing quite well in elites...but im sure you haev a good reason of why you think that?
Caugh caugh???? Great spelling Sioux recruit? I hope you knowledge of the game is better than your spelling. The bottom line is that Lehrke is a non factor for the season! He may score 60-70 goals but is won't be enough to get his team past the second round of the section tournament. Bottom line is he and Park are a non factor. Never have been a factor and never will be a factor. Sorry to break the news to ya. good player but a below average team.
As much of a factor or more than Crookston, Low, or Bemidji is. Have to wait and see how they do against EGF, and TRF.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:16 am
by SiouxRecruit
Flin Flon wrote:SiouxRecruit wrote:Wave Fan 68 wrote:
yes we will see and lehrke will get shut down no pts.
Yea maybe they will shut him down like last year...caugh "2 goals" caugh...and hes only gotten that much better after doing quite well in elites...but im sure you haev a good reason of why you think that?
Caugh caugh???? Great spelling Sioux recruit? I hope you knowledge of the game is better than your spelling. The bottom line is that Lehrke is a non factor for the season! He may score 60-70 goals but is won't be enough to get his team past the second round of the section tournament. Bottom line is he and Park are a non factor. Never have been a factor and never will be a factor. Sorry to break the news to ya. good player but a below average team.
You cant talk about my grammar and then go say " I hope you knowledge of the game"...comon now...its only typing im sure you can find something else to talk about
Im not here to impress people with my spelling....a non-factor means hes not a factor at all...and yet he is a factor...considering its a team....winning sections or not hes still a factor..and there is NO reason why park couldnt or shouldnt get past the second round...park has ONLY gotten better since last year
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:18 am
by SiouxRecruit
SB24 wrote:maybe because walker shut him down??????
You catching anything?
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:35 am
by Flin Flon
woulda coulda shoulda... That is Parks answer to everything! Win an important game and then you can say that they area factor. Just get to a title game and I will throw your team a bone. But it is not going to happen this year or in the next 15 years. NON FACTOR.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:01 pm
by SB24
So PR isn't going to play Lehrke against Walker because they aren't good enough? With PR's schedule does that mean that Lehrke gets to play in about 2 games this year? haha. Get serious here, he got shut down against Walker!
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:38 pm
by the mullet
SB24 wrote:So PR isn't going to play Lehrke against Walker because they aren't good enough? With PR's schedule does that mean that Lehrke gets to play in about 2 games this year? haha. Get serious here, he got shut down against Walker!
You need to get serious, if he really did put up 30 pts in that Fall League, then i doubt he will be shut down very much this season. Could it be that in a game like that he was trying to play the role of set up man???
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:43 pm
by Irishmans Shanty
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:47 pm
by the mullet
Agreed, moving on, Shanty how on earth did your boys put up that many goals the other night, No offense, just not exactly a crookston-like score.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:47 pm
by SiouxRecruit
I know park played 4 lines against Walker for some of the game...and when they play lower caliber teams, their best players arnt out there to score goals..they create plays to make park that much better as a team.. example lehrke
In the long run for THIS season I dont think Lehrke is too worried about socring tons of points with lots of goals...I may be wrong but thats just what im guessing...
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:40 pm
by newsguy35
SiouxRecruit wrote:I know park played 4 lines against Walker for some of the game...and when they play lower caliber teams, their best players arnt out there to score goals..they create plays to make park that much better as a team.. example lehrke
In the long run for THIS season I dont think Lehrke is too worried about socring tons of points with lots of goals...I may be wrong but thats just what im guessing...
I could be wrong here in my statement but did he not sign a D1 letter of intent to go to SCSU? I dont think he has much else to prove to anybody in HS. Hopefully as a team PR can prove that they are better than a first round team.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:41 pm
by elliott70
Irishmans Shanty wrote:
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:39 pm
by Irishmans Shanty
the mullet wrote:Agreed, moving on, Shanty how on earth did your boys put up that many goals the other night, No offense, just not exactly a crookston-like score.
It's a good question, Crookston has been starving for goals since the beginning of Bittner's first tour as coach. For those not familiar with the timeline here, that would specifically be the 1987-88 season. To date, the class of '88 has not been replaced or even remotely matched in numbers or talent. As a result, there has been a long, long, long, long, long, long run of offensively deficient-grind it out teams. This year's team may very well fit that profile again, but for one night "the cupeth overflowed".
As an optimist, I think this group could light up the scoreboard a bit if the pups continue to develop. Now I know, they scored 10 against RLF. To me, it doesn't matter, I've seen Pirate teams that could play 5 on 0 against the other teams goalie for three periods and still only win 2-0. I think this team finally could have a couple of finishers in the lineup. Time will tell.
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:41 pm
by SiouxRecruit
yes time will tell just about everything......especially in these forums
....any good games coming up this week?
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:44 pm
by SiouxRecruit
newsguy35 wrote:SiouxRecruit wrote:I know park played 4 lines against Walker for some of the game...and when they play lower caliber teams, their best players arnt out there to score goals..they create plays to make park that much better as a team.. example lehrke
In the long run for THIS season I dont think Lehrke is too worried about socring tons of points with lots of goals...I may be wrong but thats just what im guessing...
I could be wrong here in my statement but did he not sign a D1 letter of intent to go to SCSU? I dont think he has much else to prove to anybody in HS. Hopefully as a team PR can prove that they are better than a first round team.
If he signed I didn't know this...is it true?..the last I knew he was going to Cedar Rapids to play...I know schools were looking...id guess he will still play juniors for atleast a year?
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:18 pm
by warriors07
newsguy35 wrote:SiouxRecruit wrote:I know park played 4 lines against Walker for some of the game...and when they play lower caliber teams, their best players arnt out there to score goals..they create plays to make park that much better as a team.. example lehrke
In the long run for THIS season I dont think Lehrke is too worried about socring tons of points with lots of goals...I may be wrong but thats just what im guessing...
I could be wrong here in my statement but did he not sign a D1 letter of intent to go to SCSU? I dont think he has much else to prove to anybody in HS. Hopefully as a team PR can prove that they are better than a first round team.
I believe the answer is no on this one, he has yet to sign with any college at this point. From what i have heard there are various wcha schools interested among other major college hockey schools
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:20 pm
by warriors07
newsguy35 wrote:SiouxRecruit wrote:I know park played 4 lines against Walker for some of the game...and when they play lower caliber teams, their best players arnt out there to score goals..they create plays to make park that much better as a team.. example lehrke
In the long run for THIS season I dont think Lehrke is too worried about socring tons of points with lots of goals...I may be wrong but thats just what im guessing...
I could be wrong here in my statement but did he not sign a D1 letter of intent to go to SCSU? I dont think he has much else to prove to anybody in HS. Hopefully as a team PR can prove that they are better than a first round team.
I believe the answer on this one is no, he has yet to sign with any college at this point. The talk has been there are a few wcha schools interested along with various other major college programs
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:26 pm
by warriors07
I do believe Bemidji State is right in the the middle of things as well.