Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 4:22 pm
Kids still need to be kids.
The Largest Prep Hockey Message Board Community on the Web
https://www.ushsho.com/forums/
Your right on buddy! is there anyone else that is "us." The funny thing is every post you have made to this point is about myself or the Monopoly man who hasn't posted on this forum for quite some time. Also I think the joke is suppose to be ocean front property, but once again your credibility is zero! again you know that I know that you know that I know you sir are full of...... Do you have any other conspiracy theories you'd like to throw out? I think the cool aid is wearing on you.Tellitlikeitis wrote:Scott...errr I mean MonopolyMan, Enjoy the Show and now Hockeyfan74, .....who's next? I'm sure there is more. Give it up the gig is up.
What a coincidence another "Monopoly" parent happens to be reading this board and happens to know ETS and MM. If anybody believes that I have some Iowa lakeshore to sell you !!
The moderator already slapped me on the wrist for posting info. about IP address so I'll play by the rules. I know the truth and exposed you. This is the last I'll say on it because it's not worth it but I applaud your determination
Have you been to the Brick tournament?Deep Breath wrote:A lot of the 2000-level teams in the International Cup appear to be open-level teams (Snipers, Foothills, Thunder Bay, Crush, Legacy). Not sure why the Blades would get into that field, especially since they have the Brick just a month later. Would think that trying to prepare for the level of teams they will see in Edmonton, playing open-level teams would not be the best way to get ready.
I have had two kids play in the Brick and have been to the Brick two other times (I am involved with the Blades).old goalie85 wrote: Do any of you folks have any brick experience? Are they always in the same place?
Do you have a son on Torspo? or did you just watch those games? were you also at the machine vs. Icemen game?Vulcan82 wrote:In 2 games machine has outscored the torspo 12-1 and the torspo might have mustered up 10 shots on goal each game and thats giving the torspo the benefit of the doubt. No team in Minnesota is even close to the machine at present, they destroyed the icemen 9-1 and hit 4-5 posts as well in the game. I don't even have a kid on this team but the machine are very strong and alot of fun to watch.scrapiron wrote:Which team is stronger between the Machine and Torspo?
Are these Blades scores from this year? If so, not too bad.Machine parent wrote:First of all - yes, I'm a Machine parent so half of you guys can already choose to hate me. Thought I'd get that out of the way up front!
Okay - haters on both side need to take it easy with all the allegations and hear-say about the rivalry between the Blades/Machine/Monopoly/Icemen and whoever is next AND about the Brick, recruiting for the Brick and all the talk around that too. It's deteriorated into a "my dad can beat up your dad" type of argument. Fact is a lot of recruiting happens behind the scenes - so what?! Doesn't matter if the team you play for is for profit or non profit - EVERY team wants the best players whether it be for the team or just for a tournament. If your kid is in the mix - be happy and proud and put the disdain for other programs that you don't call your own aside.
As far as the Brick "controversy" goes - I just want to throw out the head to head records of the above mentioned teams vs the Machine (as I know them anyway).
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Blades (2 - 0) Score of 3 - 1 and 4 - 2.
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Monopoly (2 - 0) Scores of 5 - 0 and 8 - 0.
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Icemen (1 - 0) Score of 9 - 1.
Point being - if the Brick truly wants the best kids (or best team) from here to represent Minnesota up there in Edmonton, then it should at least include some Machine kids (either that or we got REALLY lucky five times in a row)! The Blades are at the wheel so they can call the shots - I completely understand and that's fine. Enough with all that back and forth mudslinging. Let the Blades build their Brick team the way they want - I just think they would be stronger with some Machine kids on the roster (and a couple Icemen kids for that matter).
IcemenDeep Breath wrote:A lot of the 2000-level teams in the International Cup appear to be open-level teams (Snipers, Foothills, Thunder Bay, Crush, Legacy). Not sure why the Blades would get into that field, especially since they have the Brick just a month later. Would think that trying to prepare for the level of teams they will see in Edmonton, playing open-level teams would not be the best way to get ready.
BecauseMrBoDangles wrote:IcemenDeep Breath wrote:A lot of the 2000-level teams in the International Cup appear to be open-level teams (Snipers, Foothills, Thunder Bay, Crush, Legacy). Not sure why the Blades would get into that field, especially since they have the Brick just a month later. Would think that trying to prepare for the level of teams they will see in Edmonton, playing open-level teams would not be the best way to get ready.
Monopoly
Blades
Team Reebok(heard they are very good)
Miracle
Legacy
Why wouldn't the Machine and Torspo take the short drive to Blaine?
No these are not scores from this year except the icemen score of 9-1, same team that won the meltdown. The monopoly, torspo, icemen and blades could all beat each other on any given day. The machine is minimum of 5 and probably closer to 10 goals better than any of these teams, not too close.MrBoDangles wrote:Are these Blades scores from this year? If so, not too bad.Machine parent wrote:First of all - yes, I'm a Machine parent so half of you guys can already choose to hate me. Thought I'd get that out of the way up front!
Okay - haters on both side need to take it easy with all the allegations and hear-say about the rivalry between the Blades/Machine/Monopoly/Icemen and whoever is next AND about the Brick, recruiting for the Brick and all the talk around that too. It's deteriorated into a "my dad can beat up your dad" type of argument. Fact is a lot of recruiting happens behind the scenes - so what?! Doesn't matter if the team you play for is for profit or non profit - EVERY team wants the best players whether it be for the team or just for a tournament. If your kid is in the mix - be happy and proud and put the disdain for other programs that you don't call your own aside.
As far as the Brick "controversy" goes - I just want to throw out the head to head records of the above mentioned teams vs the Machine (as I know them anyway).
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Blades (2 - 0) Score of 3 - 1 and 4 - 2.
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Monopoly (2 - 0) Scores of 5 - 0 and 8 - 0.
• 2000 Machine vs 2000 Icemen (1 - 0) Score of 9 - 1.
Point being - if the Brick truly wants the best kids (or best team) from here to represent Minnesota up there in Edmonton, then it should at least include some Machine kids (either that or we got REALLY lucky five times in a row)! The Blades are at the wheel so they can call the shots - I completely understand and that's fine. Enough with all that back and forth mudslinging. Let the Blades build their Brick team the way they want - I just think they would be stronger with some Machine kids on the roster (and a couple Icemen kids for that matter).
As I recall, didn't the 2000 Blades make it to the finals in Chicago? Not bad if you ask me. As far as last years 2000 coach being the "best coach in youth hockey in Minnesota"Terrible Ted Lindsay wrote:Terry, the brick is a great tournament, so why would u blow up the 2000 Blades? Change coaches, lose key kids, and destroy probably the best 2000 Hockey Team in Minnesota last year? For what?terrymoore17 wrote:I have had two kids play in the Brick and have been to the Brick two other times (I am involved with the Blades).old goalie85 wrote: Do any of you folks have any brick experience? Are they always in the same place?
The Brick is the most amazing tournament I have seen. One dad who played in the State HS tournament and WCHA called it the best tournament experience in hockey. You need to see it to believe it.
All games are played at the West Edmonton Mall (sister mall to MOA), under a glass dome. The rink is sunny. Crowds are big, especiall late r in the week, and right on top of the players. The level of play is very advanced. Lots of extras are included. All players must come from your assigned region (ours is MN) except each team can have three import players.
For the record, when we build our Brick teams, we always leave a few spots open for springtime additions. When we find the right players, we invite them to join us for the week. Most accept the invitation.Can't get anybody to go with u to the Brick this year to shore up the much weaker team u have this year, eh? It's all about Coaching and ego Terry(yours in that regard), I don't even know last years Coach, but I saw the boys play and they were the best passing and position playing 9 year old team I've ever seen in my 40 years of coaching and playing hockey. If they had been kept together the Machine would have been an afterthought this year. BIG MISTAKE TERRY BOY!Now you will take this Blades Team to the Brick and they will be embarrassed just like they were earlier this year in Chicago and the Meltdown Tourney! All because u personally fired the best Youth Coach in Minnesota and tore the 2000 Blades Team apart!
Signed....Terrible Ted Lindsay
Greatone99 and Highofftheglass - What do you think of the coaching job of your "experienced" 2000 Blades coach so far? Geeze, I hope you saw the Torspo/Blades game the other night so you could see the WONDERS that a coach with soooo much experience has done with that squad! To his credit he did do a good job instructing everyone on the team to get out of the way when either one of his two best players got the puck so they could try to skate it all the way up the ice! To say that it was pathetic would be not giving the Torspo team its due (but it WAS pathetic)!GreatOne99 wrote:I'd love to read NIINTEAM's answer to HOTG's post. It's a good point worth discussing. Pay a lot of money to play top notch AAA hockey, and you have the choice (no pun intended) to play for a well respected coach (2000 blades), or a parent coach (2000 Machine), with no real coaching or playing background. I guess in the end, what experience does Bernie McBain have? I can answer that one, NONE!High Off The Glass wrote:Please elaberate. Excellent in what way? Explain how a parent coach, with very limited playing experience (if any, and I'm being kind), is going to develop your son. To be honest, a trained monkey can take the best 8-9 year old kids in the metro area coach and win hockey games, but years down the road, will these kids develop under a coach with no real coaching or playing experience. You must ask yourself, with the money your spending in that program, do you deserve better than parent coaching? Don't you already get that from association hockey? I'm not trying to turn this into another Blade vs. Machine thread, but it's a question worth askingnoIinteam wrote:machine coach is excellent.
team has extremeley low turnover - kids love the coach - all top players wanted to come back - add in a solid addition from the blades + 2-3 good hockey players from north metro -- 2010 should be decent
would be great if blades would commit to 3 or 4 game series over the summer? hear blades are all about FUN so why not?