HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Posted: **Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:59 pm**

Yea cambridge has been demolished with the sickness bug. 4 of thier top 5 players were not in action vs St.Micheal. At one one point CHumley had an 8 minute shift couse they simply had no one to play. But it looks like they are all getting healt. But i do not htink they will compete with DE

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:00 pm**

betweenthepipes wrote:Cambridge's goalie is one of their weakest things? I hope your kidding. 2.2 goals against average with a .935 save percentage. And if you say that they also have no defense those are some great stats to have with no defense playing in front of you. Also I heard at the St. Michael game Cambridge was missing Sanz, the other first liner, their best defense Akers, a 2nd line player and a 3rd line player.

I can only go by the three games I've seen Cambridge play, two against Buffalo and first game against Monticello...14 goals against in three games (4.66 GAA) - maybe he played his worst three games when I was on hand?

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:28 pm**

east won't look past cambridge, actually I do feel sorry for C/I
after their bad play against Buffalo, they will need to redeem themselves
big....

Posted: **Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:07 pm**

Wow. 11-1? Not close.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

#7 Cambridge-Isanti vs #10 Northern lakes Sat Feb. 17@ 7:30

CI

Re: Cambridge