Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:28 pm
by fireinthehole
oh, why didnt you say so. U out shot them 44-25, so if you were in football game it would be a blow out.
It doesnt matter if you out shot them 144- 25. final 4-1. Last time i checked if you were behind after 3 periods that meant you loss........ I could be wrong though.
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:30 pm
by niceice909
okay eagle we all no your from new ulm so stop talking up your team just by guessing from your name your #11 i would know you name but it does not have your #'s on you roster (new ulm eagles...)
by the way you can have 44 shots but maybe 14 are good shots the rest are probely dump ins and little tricklers
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:18 pm
by eagle11
actualy we had a lot of chances, there goalie was just good. and i am not 11 by the way..old number
laughable
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:23 pm
by jancze5
Eagle11...honestly, that's a laughable accountability of the game.
So shots 20-2 in the second...final shots were 44 to 25...so in the 1st and 3rd period the shots were 24-23 and the Fire were up 3 zip with 4 min's or so in the game when you finally got one past mcnasty in net...and you account for that as game domination...LOL, seriously dude, your team is a solid Bantam A team with an excellent 1st line and a nice goaltender..take the compliment and good luck the rest of the way and in Districts.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:50 am
by DaSTeK
Why dont you guys just stop being such PLEASE BAN ME? he's merely stating a fact,
they outshot them 44-20.! and they lost 3-1 (ENG).
it happens to all of us! Of course its not an excuse! he doesnt mean "oh we really actually beat them in my mind."
you guys harass everyone who says something about themselves on this forums.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:16 pm
by ehockey#1
Why dont you guys just stop being such PLEASE BAN ME? he's merely stating a fact,
they outshot them 44-20.! and they lost 3-1 (ENG).
it happens to all of us! Of course its not an excuse! he doesnt mean "oh we really actually beat them in my mind."
you guys harass everyone who says something about themselves on this forums. THATS TRUE!!!
Actually I was watching this game and the Rochester-n. st. paul game and when i saw new ulm they were not dominating them but controlling the game. Fires goalie was on fire and sometimes lucky.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:52 pm
by dangla.
I never knew you won games on shots on goals.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:52 pm
by eagle11
i never said that i just said new ulm out played the fire
rematch-bragging rights
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:05 pm
by justanobserver
Eagle/New Ulm Bantam A player:
Settle this dispute like real men and have your manager call the 94 Fire up for another game.....before the end on the season..... a rematch. I have never heard of the Fire Hockey Club backing down or hiding from a worthy opponent!! It is not in their blood. Take notes District 2 and Eagan.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:13 am
by DaSTeK
you guys arent getting my point. Its opinionated. Dont settle it like "real men" Act like "real men".
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:46 am
by justanobserver
You want to be acknowledged and you point noted.......OK done. Enjoy your hot cup of coffee on this cold day. Move on to more Bantam A upsets.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:07 pm
by Tartan#10
Tartan killed stillwater 7-3 right after stillwater beat tartan in alexandria 4-1
Re: laughable
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:13 pm
by dangleallday16
jancze5 wrote:Eagle11...honestly, that's a laughable accountability of the game.
So shots 20-2 in the second...final shots were 44 to 25...so in the 1st and 3rd period the shots were 24-23 and the Fire were up 3 zip with 4 min's or so in the game when you finally got one past mcnasty in net...and you account for that as game domination...LOL, seriously dude, your team is a solid Bantam A team with an excellent 1st line and a nice goaltender..take the compliment and good luck the rest of the way and in Districts.
New Ulm won district 4 Bantam A's.
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:50 am
by cajones18
IR District Semi-Finals
I Falls-3
Grand Rapids-2 (OT)
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:22 pm
by BantamAhockey1
hermantown 3 gr 2
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:49 pm
by clickclick
Talk about upsets, the 94 Fire team beat the #5 team in the state...Minnetonka. They beat them 4-3, but the Fire shouldve had a couple more. I think 100% of the people watching were almost positive Minnetonka would win.
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:07 pm
by fireinthehole
Osseo 3-2 over Rochester in the East regional tournement
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:55 pm
by thenumber4
earlier in the season..
Edina 2 EP 0
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:41 pm
by peskycardinal
Why is Edina 2-0 over EP an upset?
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:58 pm
by ice00breaker
Why is Edina 2-0 over EP an upset?
Because EP is clearly better.