Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:33 pm
by Fangler
Tech has been playing good hockey lately. I think they takes this one 5-2
Re: post 9318
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:36 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
boblee wrote:EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:boblee wrote:
Elk River has only won 3 games.
That's 3 more than 0 bobber.
Your Winona State math is fantastic. Johnson wants to know if you know any
famous WinHawks.
Tell Johnson that I think that is an oxymoron.
And don't mind McTabish. He doesn't bite.
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:59 am
by fiveforfighting
this game will be a toss up, tech has been winning against bad teams and elk river has been falling to good teams. this will be a great game to watch.
Re: post 9316
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:03 pm
by rayfinkel
boblee wrote:Mr. McTabish wrote:St. Cloud can't win any games I take Elk River by 7.
Elk River has only won 3 games.
Elk River has won 4 games
Andover 6-1
North Metro 8-2
Coon Rapids 6-4
Duluth East 5-3
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:30 pm
by MNsGreatest#2
Ah as a Champlin Park faithful, it sure is nice to hear rayfinkel and EREmpire have to admit a 4-9 (3-4) record while I can sit back and boast an 11-5 (7-2) record for the Rebels. Dont get too mad tho boys you must admit you have had that luxury for 13 years now. Now CP pays back ER, for a year lol.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:16 am
by Ben Dover
Elk River by 3.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:17 am
by fiveforfighting
Mr. McTabish wrote:St. Cloud can't win any games I take Elk River by 7.
I mean its not like they have won 8 games already..
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:17 am
by Ben Dover
fiveforfighting wrote:Mr. McTabish wrote:St. Cloud can't win any games I take Elk River by 7.
I mean its not like they have won 8 games already..
They actually have won 8 games already.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:31 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
Who invited these...?
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:34 pm
by elliott70
I'll take E.R. by two.
In Winona math that's 1, 2.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:38 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
elliott70 wrote:I'll take E.R. by two.
In Winona math that's 1, 2.
Winona has math?
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:13 pm
by elliott70
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:elliott70 wrote:I'll take E.R. by two.
In Winona math that's 1, 2.
Winona has math?
Yes, it goes 1, 2.
Unless you're in the upper levels at WSU(???);
then its 1, 2, 3, uh, 4?
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:15 pm
by elliott70
Unless you're really good, then its
3757 minus 3642 equals 'closing the gap' to 4000!
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:15 pm
by waldo589
this games probably underway but im going to take the elks 4-2
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:59 pm
by STC18
Elkaholics win 4-0.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:01 pm
by MNsGreatest#2
Sounds like Mr. McTs awesome guess was correct
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:02 pm
by STC18
MNsGreatest#2 wrote:Sounds like Mr. McTs awesome guess was correct
Indeed it was.
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:51 pm
by Goldy Gopher
STC18 wrote:Elkaholics win 4-0.
I've never seen a greater result.
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:12 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
elliott70 wrote:Unless you're really good, then its
3757 minus 3642 equals 'closing the gap' to 4000!
You may try, but you will not succeed.
post 9478
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:32 am
by boblee
Emp,
Johnson is curious...could Da Elkaholics head south and beat the Flamin' Fightin' Backhandin' WinHawks?
Re: post 9478
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:50 am
by MNsGreatest#2
boblee wrote:Emp,
Johnson is curious...could Da Elkaholics head south and beat the Flamin' Fightin' Backhandin' WinHawks?
The Elks cant win hockey games. So no
Re: post 9478
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:35 pm
by EREmpireStrikesBack
boblee wrote:Emp,
Johnson is curious...could Da Elkaholics head south and beat the Flamin' Fightin' Backhandin' WinHawks?
With the way the WinnerHawks have been playing lately, I'd say it could actually be a game. And when I say game, I mean it wouldn't be running time to start the 3rd.
Hockey is waaaaay different down here. I swear they won't practice earlier than 9am or later than 9pm. 11 kids on an A squirt team. Just not the same.