Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:30 am
by yaman
This result and the dominance of the whole weekend by SSM shouldn't surprise anyone. I would like to see SSM play either Edina or Rosea.
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:45 pm
by kickinwing
yaman wrote:This result and the dominance of the whole weekend by SSM shouldn't surprise anyone. I would like to see SSM play either Edina or Rosea.
ssm lost to benilde . ssm destroyed holy angels.
so it seems ssm only dominated half the weekend.
stop trying to lump the stars into the group of teams
that are relevant . it's getting to be very annoying !
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:52 pm
by 2 sides
[quote="HShockeywatcher"]The team that played BSM wasn't the same team that played AHA, was it?
AHA was up after 1, what happened after that?[/quote
Kind of the same team. Against BSM Shattuck didn't play: Toews, Murry, or Zuck. Probably a combined point total of 200 so far this year, not in the line up for Shattuck.
I think those boys did play against AHA though. Not sure. But, yes it was the same Prep team.
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:00 pm
by kickinwing
i don't care if they played with their jockstraps on backwards THEY LOST!
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:27 pm
by 2 sides
kickinwing wrote:i don't care if they played with their jockstraps on backwards THEY LOST!
Ok, settle down. If it makes you feel that good, rock on!!!!!!!! Just stating facts. Just a game folks.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:47 am
by kickinwing
2 sides wrote:kickinwing wrote:i don't care if they played with their jockstraps on backwards THEY LOST!
Ok, settle down. If it makes you feel that good, rock on!!!!!!!! Just stating facts. Just a game folks.
murry and toews put a combined 12 shots on goal. pretty good trick for a couple of guys in street clothes.zuck served a two min. minor [they must of not liked the way he was dressed]
refer to bms vs. shatyuck post ; page 3.
YOU should settle down and research your information before you post a bunch of crap.it may just be a game ,but i don't like the way you're playin.