HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

bigred wrote:We will see...I bet all 5 of my predictions play D1!!!

I have my doubts that all 5 will make D1 but I know that they are all nice kids with talent so I wish them all luck in whatever they do.

hockey fan 01 wrote:Just because chaska isn't your stupid eden priarie team doesn't mean they don't have talent, gopher9

Never said they didn't have talent! Not 5 D1 players though! Like I said Dani Williams has the potential with her size and strength. The rest are all D3.

To the people who are saying all 5 girls wont go D1, you have probably watched 1 maybe 2 of their games. I am not saying I have seen most of the games either, but the juniors Tam and Sam Meuweissen, Sophmores Dani Williams and Catie Ladner, and Possibly Freshman Leah Johnson, are still very young. when they get the puck they know what to do with it. I know for a fact that Dani Williams and Catie Ladner will be just as good as most of the girls on EP by their senior years. Those two girls are very young and have alot of potential.

Wanted:

One crystal ball. Last seen at Hockey111 house. Seems to hold the power of the future. Hopefully it will provide schedules to other games other than Chaska so that the holder will see other players to compare her favorites against. Sounds like she watches the crystal ball more than girls hockey. How many D-1 games have you seen 111 to know what the talent level needs to be? Sounds like you lack the high school games to make these comments.

It seems gopher9 thinks he knows the future

hockey111 wrote:To the people who are saying all 5 girls wont go D1, you have probably watched 1 maybe 2 of their games. I am not saying I have seen most of the games either, but the juniors Tam and Sam Meuweissen, Sophmores Dani Williams and Catie Ladner, and Possibly Freshman Leah Johnson, are still very young. when they get the puck they know what to do with it. I know for a fact that Dani Williams and Catie Ladner will be just as good as most of the girls on EP by their senior years. Those two girls are very young and have alot of potential.

I am not positive but if I remember right the Meuweissen girls did not start playing hockey untill about 7th grade. and I am not sure if they have played hockey all year round like alot of players do they still might have some room to grow as hockey players, even if it is only one more year.

D1? Maybe, maybe not.

hockey1518 wrote:It seems gopher9 thinks he knows the future

One thing I do know is that you dont know what the heck your talking about!!

hockey111 wrote:To the people who are saying all 5 girls wont go D1, you have probably watched 1 maybe 2 of their games.

I have seen these girls play many games. I think they are very good players however I think that Gopher9 has a point in saying that they aren't sure bets to play D1 because there are many girls out there that are just as talented and many that are more talented that won't play D1. Only time will tell if they have what it takes to make it to the next level. Note that there are outstanding seniors that still haven't had a sniff from a D1 school this year and you have to consider that as good as it is in Minnesota there are also many girls in Canada and the rest of the country that we do not see that are being pursued by D1 scouts. 5 girls from one school would be outstanding but I think it is wishful thinking that all 5 will make it to a D1 school.

Chaska HAS talent. Dani Williams AND Catie Ladner both made the Select 16's. Out of over 300 they are TWO of the last SIXTEEN.

So whoever doesn't think Chaska has talent... needs to re-evaluate and think again.

hockey fan 01 wrote:Chaska HAS talent. Dani Williams AND Catie Ladner both made the Select 16's. Out of over 300 they are TWO of the last SIXTEEN.

So whoever doesn't think Chaska has talent... needs to re-evaluate and think again.

congrats Dani & Catie Both deserve to move on,

gopher9 wrote:

hockey fan 01 wrote:Just because chaska isn't your stupid eden priarie team doesn't mean they don't have talent, gopher9

Never said they didn't have talent! Not 5 D1 players though! Like I said Dani Williams has the potential with her size and strength. The rest are all D3.

Dated Thursday Oct. 8, 2009

gopher9 wrote:

gopher9 wrote:

hockey fan 01 wrote:Just because chaska isn't your stupid eden priarie team doesn't mean they don't have talent, gopher9

Never said they didn't have talent! Not 5 D1 players though! Like I said Dani Williams has the potential with her size and strength. The rest are all D3.

Dated Thursday Oct. 8, 2009

well catie ladner has recieved many D1 offers. so there ya go. so the REST are NOT D3

Where has she decided to go? or still contemplating?

rmmaiv123 wrote:

gopher9 wrote:

gopher9 wrote:
Never said they didn't have talent! Not 5 D1 players though! Like I said Dani Williams has the potential with her size and strength. The rest are all D3.

Dated Thursday Oct. 8, 2009

well catie ladner has recieved many D1 offers. so there ya go. so the REST are NOT D3

Congrats to Dani! Well when you find out where Catie is going post it! I think I was right with Williams!!!!!

Catie Ladner committed to Sacred Heart University last week....D1