Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:43 pm
by NippenTopChed08
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
dadoc wrote:heard it was a handicapped gentleman who missed chuck a puck!
Who let tomASS into the game? :shock:

:idea:
he must have slipped by security

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:53 pm
by tomASS
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
dadoc wrote:heard it was a handicapped gentleman who missed chuck a puck!
Who let tomASS into the game? :shock:

:idea:
my aim and timing are always bad.......you should see my bathroom at home. That's why I now wear "Opps I Crapped My Pants", but only the decorative plaid flannel ones. :oops: :oops:

Elliot recommended them :P

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:57 pm
by tomASS
NippenTopChed08 wrote:
he must have slipped by security
I created a diversion and left some unattended Krispy Kreme doughnuts by the corner (of course the box was a few, or so, short of a dozen)

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:57 am
by HShockeywatcher
Zamman, not to say what you said isn't true, but you didn't answer what I was asking. Yes, the moron should be kick out, maybe even banned from the arena if you're enough of a dip to throw a puck on the ice during play. But I'm wonder what the ruling is to what would happen on the ice and what the call in the game would be.

If you're down 0-1, skating down, someone throws a puck out, you score, what happens? Etc. With the goal being disallowed in the opening post of this thread, that opens up hypothetically lots for morons to do when their team is down and possibly getting scored on. Seems backward to me to call the goal off.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:23 am
by Cabela10
I would think they would let the play go on if it did not effect the rush towards the net. After the shot on goal or turnover, they would blow the play dead immediately. Unless the puck was thrown on the ice and sitting in the path of the players coming down the ice. Then it should be blown dead immediately and dropped in the neutral zone.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:44 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
tomASS wrote:
NippenTopChed08 wrote:
he must have slipped by security
I created a diversion and left some unattended Krispy Kreme doughnuts by the corner (of course the box was a few, or so, short of a dozen)
He said security, not police. You must be pretty sneaky.

:idea:

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:49 am
by tomASS
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
tomASS wrote:
NippenTopChed08 wrote:
he must have slipped by security
I created a diversion and left some unattended Krispy Kreme doughnuts by the corner (of course the box was a few, or so, short of a dozen)
He said security, not police. You must be pretty sneaky.

:idea:
Yeah, not a word to my cousin because the next time I drive through your town I might get a citation for the doughnut joke. I had promised no more.

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:55 am
by EREmpireStrikesBack
tomASS wrote:
EREmpireStrikesBack wrote:
tomASS wrote: I created a diversion and left some unattended Krispy Kreme doughnuts by the corner (of course the box was a few, or so, short of a dozen)
He said security, not police. You must be pretty sneaky.

:idea:
Yeah, not a word to my cousin because the next time I drive through your town I might get a citation for the doughnut joke. I had promised no more.
Pretty sure you are screwed no matter what.

:idea: